patrickivan
Sr Member
The definition of Science Fiction is NOT up for debate, despite some comments here.
What many people are incorrectly stating here is THEIR interpretation of the definition of Science Fiction. That is unfortunate.
In this case, is Star Wars even loosely based on Sci-fi? And it isn't. The tech in it isn't based on any logic or real-world reason. The worlds in it. The complete lack of application of Physics. Lucas didn't look up technological advancements and try to apply them in a futuristic setting, and then create a story on their impact on humanity. THAT is science fiction. He didn't do any of that.
It is a fantasy. There is nothing about it grounded in any remote form of reality other than there are humans that speak. Like Lord of the Rings.
Remember that opening crawl. It pretty much sums it up.
What many people are incorrectly stating here is THEIR interpretation of the definition of Science Fiction. That is unfortunate.
In this case, is Star Wars even loosely based on Sci-fi? And it isn't. The tech in it isn't based on any logic or real-world reason. The worlds in it. The complete lack of application of Physics. Lucas didn't look up technological advancements and try to apply them in a futuristic setting, and then create a story on their impact on humanity. THAT is science fiction. He didn't do any of that.
It is a fantasy. There is nothing about it grounded in any remote form of reality other than there are humans that speak. Like Lord of the Rings.
Remember that opening crawl. It pretty much sums it up.