Status
Not open for further replies.







The event is the Archer Film Festival. Nike is a sponsor, hence the shirts.
Thanks.
 







The event is the Archer Film Festival. Nike is a sponsor, hence the shirts.
You're such a sweet kid, Joek3rr
 
I don't know if it's because times have changed, or everyone I know now just has more money than my parents did when I was a kid, but every kid I know now has a whole room full of toys. For me, getting a new toy was a BIG deal. The beauty of Star Wars action figures was that you could get just one every other month or so without breaking my parents bank. I treasured them.
Toys are a lot more disposable these days, which I think contributes to it. But also culture itself was more monolithic. My kid is 5 and she's gone through a few phases. At one point she was super into Peppa Pig. Then she got really into Bluey. But a lot of stuff just doesn't hold her attention and she really doesn't enjoy just sitting and watching a 22 minute TV show about a single thing. She prefers shorter shows (anywhere from 7 to 12 min mini-episodes, usually two strung together to form an overall episode), and she wants to be able to control stuff like she does with the tablet. She doesn't understand using a remote.

It's not better or worse, it's just different from my experience. But what it also means is that stuff seems to come and go more quickly. You don't have these few durable mega-franchises (G.I. Joe, Transformers, Barbie, etc.). I mean, there was a ton of toy crap from the '80s that never quite took off, or was around for a few years and then vanished, but there were also these larger franchises. But they were also spread across way fewer channels. Growing up, we didn't have cable, so I got the 6 channels (3 VHF, 3 UHF). I only saw the USA Cartoon Express and Nickelodeon at my grandparents' place out in the 'burbs.

But now, with streaming and cable services and all kinds of different channels, nothing lands hard enough or lasts long enough to really stick around for very long. Some things do well. Peppa is still going strong, I guess. Bluey is another big success. But it's just...different now.
Best character with the worst action figure: Obi wan. The plastic cape died within minutes of playing with it and he looked dumb without the cape. Also...old dude. Fine for playing Star Wars, but he did very poorly when I used the figures for bath time, wrestling, or to play football. (I never found out if other kids did that or not, but I lined them all up and played out games with them).

Worst character with best action figure: AT AT driver. I originally thought of Boba Fett, but then I remembered this guy. Did literally nothing in any movie, but the action figure SHINED. By play rules, the helmet meant he could breathe underwater which made him a very powerful bathtub figure. He was also dressed for football, and at wrestling the armor protected him and he had substantial shoulders.

included photos, but the guns and lightsabers never seemed to stay around long. Too easily lost.
Ironically, my AT-AT driver's gun lasted FOREVER and I wound up giving it to my G.I. Joe guys to use. Star Wars had some of the coolest guns (IG-88's was another standout), but the lack of articulation made me prefer G.I. Joe.
Which is a shame because, apart from all the horribly-scripted "flirting" that's where we got the one good glimpse into Anakin's motivations. Where they're talking about how frustrated he is at the political deadlock, things someone should sit all the senators down until they agree on something, and then do it. She says that's what they try to do in the senate, but there are so many contradicting philosophies and moralities it's hard to reach consensus -- or even majority. And he says well then someone should make them agree. She asks if he means him. He laughs that off and says no, but someone -- someone wise. She says that sounds like a dictatorship. He's looking at the grass and says, "Whatever works..." Then realizes what he said and looks at her and tries to brush it off as a joke. But right there we get a glimpse of what he's willing to do to be allowed to act.
Yeah, see, to me, this is the Anakin I wanted to see. Anakin who is basically well-meaning at the start, but who becomes increasingly militant and inflexible and willing to give into rage by the end. All the while, telling himself he's doing it for the greater good. That, to me, would've made his motivations way more interesting than just "I have deep-seated attachment issues and I really just need therapy." But an Anakin who is pissed at the inefficiency of the system, horrified by the death and loss around him, attached to his clone troopers in ways that other Jedi aren't, lacks the ability to be detached in the war (which makes him a daring hero willing to put his life on the line to save others, but also ultimately a ruthless villain willing to do horrible things if it will mean "never again"), etc. That Anakin I could see falling to the Dark Side. That's the Anakin I hear in Vader's appeal to Luke to join him, to bring "order out of this destructive conflict." Order at any cost. To do evil in service to the greater good. That's an interesting character.

Lucas' Anakin is kind of interesting, but seems really out of place in the midst of a conflict about a democracy degenerating into a totalitarian dictatorship.
I miss LucasArts.
*90s LucasArts, just so we're clear. Latter-day LucasArts went downhill fast.
I feel like the PT spent way too much time at the center of power, and the ST none at all.
Yeah, they never seemed to quite get the balance right. With the OT it kinda doesnt' matter because you don't know anything about this universe anyway. But the PT sets itself up to be all about the fall of a government, and then George is like "But that doesn't really matter. This is the story of the boy who missed his mom..." (Which, side note, was never even full sold because Anakin never seems conflicted at leaving Shmi, just sort of "Yay! This'll be fun! Oh, also, big hug for mom and I'll miss her." We never hear him reminisce about her, we never see his reluctance or ambivalence at leaving, it's just...not handled, so his heel turn ends up never quite landing.)

With the ST, there's HUGE STUFF going on buuuuut you can only find out about it in the novels. Meanwhile, here's Rey! And the Resistance! Which isn't the Republic! Or the Rebellion! And there's the First Order which exists because....uh....reasons! Never mind! Watch out for rathtars! Oh no! Now we're on the run again! Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
 
Toys are a lot more disposable these days, which I think contributes to it. But also culture itself was more monolithic. My kid is 5 and she's gone through a few phases. At one point she was super into Peppa Pig. Then she got really into Bluey. But a lot of stuff just doesn't hold her attention and she really doesn't enjoy just sitting and watching a 22 minute TV show about a single thing. She prefers shorter shows (anywhere from 7 to 12 min mini-episodes, usually two strung together to form an overall episode), and she wants to be able to control stuff like she does with the tablet. She doesn't understand using a remote.

It's not better or worse, it's just different from my experience. But what it also means is that stuff seems to come and go more quickly. You don't have these few durable mega-franchises (G.I. Joe, Transformers, Barbie, etc.). I mean, there was a ton of toy crap from the '80s that never quite took off, or was around for a few years and then vanished, but there were also these larger franchises. But they were also spread across way fewer channels. Growing up, we didn't have cable, so I got the 6 channels (3 VHF, 3 UHF). I only saw the USA Cartoon Express and Nickelodeon at my grandparents' place out in the 'burbs.

But now, with streaming and cable services and all kinds of different channels, nothing lands hard enough or lasts long enough to really stick around for very long. Some things do well. Peppa is still going strong, I guess. Bluey is another big success. But it's just...different now.

Ironically, my AT-AT driver's gun lasted FOREVER and I wound up giving it to my G.I. Joe guys to use. Star Wars had some of the coolest guns (IG-88's was another standout), but the lack of articulation made me prefer G.I. Joe.

Yeah, see, to me, this is the Anakin I wanted to see. Anakin who is basically well-meaning at the start, but who becomes increasingly militant and inflexible and willing to give into rage by the end. All the while, telling himself he's doing it for the greater good. That, to me, would've made his motivations way more interesting than just "I have deep-seated attachment issues and I really just need therapy." But an Anakin who is pissed at the inefficiency of the system, horrified by the death and loss around him, attached to his clone troopers in ways that other Jedi aren't, lacks the ability to be detached in the war (which makes him a daring hero willing to put his life on the line to save others, but also ultimately a ruthless villain willing to do horrible things if it will mean "never again"), etc. That Anakin I could see falling to the Dark Side. That's the Anakin I hear in Vader's appeal to Luke to join him, to bring "order out of this destructive conflict." Order at any cost. To do evil in service to the greater good. That's an interesting character.

Lucas' Anakin is kind of interesting, but seems really out of place in the midst of a conflict about a democracy degenerating into a totalitarian dictatorship.

*90s LucasArts, just so we're clear. Latter-day LucasArts went downhill fast.

Yeah, they never seemed to quite get the balance right. With the OT it kinda doesnt' matter because you don't know anything about this universe anyway. But the PT sets itself up to be all about the fall of a government, and then George is like "But that doesn't really matter. This is the story of the boy who missed his mom..." (Which, side note, was never even full sold because Anakin never seems conflicted at leaving Shmi, just sort of "Yay! This'll be fun! Oh, also, big hug for mom and I'll miss her." We never hear him reminisce about her, we never see his reluctance or ambivalence at leaving, it's just...not handled, so his heel turn ends up never quite landing.)

With the ST, there's HUGE STUFF going on buuuuut you can only find out about it in the novels. Meanwhile, here's Rey! And the Resistance! Which isn't the Republic! Or the Rebellion! And there's the First Order which exists because....uh....reasons! Never mind! Watch out for rathtars! Oh no! Now we're on the run again! Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
Yeah Anakin is a complex character made reductive in the PT imo.

Anakin has two driving motivations for what he does:
- protect the ones he loves.
- address “injustices” he sees in the universe

I do think his primary motivation to be a jedi are these two factors. As a powerless slave, Anakin knows the hardships of injustice and the need for “power” to fix these injustices. Jedi of legends are described like all-powerful ronin, roaming the universe to fix injustices.

So Anakin was pretty disillusioned by the jedi after joining and seeing how restrictive they actually are. Needing to report everything to the council who needs approval from the senate, etc. He also doesnt care about things like democracy. Who cares about ideals when people are literally suffering under slavery or worse. Ideals dont help them, actions do. Better be a tyrant that makes positive change in the world than just endlessly talk and be inactive while people die. Its probably why Anakin is also drawn to Palpatine, the ideal leader in his eyes since Palps wants to take action and is “wise” from Anakin’s perspective.

It wasnt a mistake for PT to focus on Anakin’s love for his family since that is what finally redeems Vader in VI. But only focusing on his love makes him seem like a lovestruck kid and not an ambitious man with talent and good intentions gone awry. Like make Anakin want to be on the council so he can finally participate in the decision-making process and get the jedi to act against injustices. Show Anakin get passed for promotion several times despite being the most competent and restricted from acting (or disobeying orders and acheving good but get punished for it), fueling his disillusion.

Again, PT is a series with interesting ideas and concepts executed terribly.
 
25 Days of Star Wars Music - day 14

John Williams, despite his age, never disappoints. Rey's theme is one of his best. Like Anakin's it had some celeste, for that child like naivety. It's a beautiful piece that's fun, adventures, and a bit sad and lonely.

 
It wasnt a mistake for PT to focus on Anakin’s love for his family since that is what finally redeems Vader in VI. But only focusing on his love makes him seem like a lovestruck kid and not an ambitious man with talent and good intentions gone awry. Like make Anakin want to be on the council so he can finally participate in the decision-making process and get the jedi to act against injustices. Show Anakin get passed for promotion several times despite being the most competent and restricted from acting (or disobeying orders and acheving good but get punished for it), fueling his disillusion.
Really good take, except I have to disagree a little here. It was a mistake for the PT to focus on Anakin, period. A strong Han Solo-like supporting character, sure, but Obi-Wan was supposed to be the focus. With more screen time and a co-writer more skilled at the nuts-and-bolts scaffolding of structuring a narrative story out of a pile of ideas, having Anakin's drive to act be something Obi-Wan has to confront -- including within himself -- and contrast against his own early indoctrination and internalized desire to be "the perfect Jedi" that has also recently crashed up against his disillusionment with the Council and questioning what it means to be a Jedi in the first place. Trying to keep Anakin in check and on the path force him to figure out, for himself and in a hurry, what that path is.

Instead we got a story so reductionist it's almost puerile. Right up there with time-travel, too, is prophecies and visions. Bad storytelling mechanic. Someone, somewhere, in that person's/those people's circle would be on-hand to point out that the more you try to prevent a prophecy or vision from coming true, the more likely you are to fulfill it. So having two-thirds of the PT be about Anakin trying to keep his visions from coming true had me yelling at the screen -- even imagined, in a crowded theater -- that that doesn't work. On top of the stuff that contradicted the OT or was just stupid, Anakin doesn't work as the central focus. He doesn't have enough nuance to carry the story as the Main Character. And the one who does and should ends up losing screen time in which that can be developed and shown to focus on "Anakin misses his mommy and doesn't want his secret wife to die in vague circumstances".
 
Last edited:
How about a story about the person or people that actually made the prophecies? I mean, who the heck were these folks? How do they know all this crap?
I always wondered this too.. was yoda one of the originals who saw this prophecy?
 
Another thing I have always wondered about is this whole Darth Plagueis "stop people from dying" thing. Practically speaking, what does that actually mean? Does it make people invulnerable? Do they just live longer? Is it just the "joining with The Force" deal? What if they get shot, or blown up, like on a Death Star or something? Do they come back? There's about a bajillion ways you can die, does this cancel out every way to die? It's pretty damn vague. What does it mean?
 
25 Days of Star Wars Music - day 15

Sadly not present on the official album release of Revenge of the Sith. The film mix however opens with some killer percussion.

 
Another thing I have always wondered about is this whole Darth Plagueis "stop people from dying" thing. Practically speaking, what does that actually mean? Does it make people invulnerable? Do they just live longer? Is it just the "joining with The Force" deal? What if they get shot, or blown up, like on a Death Star or something? Do they come back? There's about a bajillion ways you can die, does this cancel out every way to die? It's pretty damn vague. What does it mean?
Technically, you don't have to stop ageing or have super-healing. I can see a dessicated, shattered, ancient Sith Lord who's thousands of years old and just can't die. "Well, you just said you wanted to live forever -- you didn't specify in what condition..."
 
Another thing I have always wondered about is this whole Darth Plagueis "stop people from dying" thing. Practically speaking, what does that actually mean? Does it make people invulnerable? Do they just live longer? Is it just the "joining with The Force" deal? What if they get shot, or blown up, like on a Death Star or something? Do they come back? There's about a bajillion ways you can die, does this cancel out every way to die? It's pretty damn vague. What does it mean?

I think it's just the Force healing we see in TROS. What makes it a dark side power is that you can steal from an unwilling 3rd party. Like the theory that Palpatine drained Padme to save Anakin. The light side version requires you to use your own life force, which you build back up the old fashioned way. (Unless you pull a Ben Solo and use it all to bring someone back from the dead). It can't stop someone from getting blown up however.
 
The most savage example of Sith "healing" was in the Darth Bane novels where Darth Bane was dying and he kills a guy's kids in front of him to use the anger/fear/horror and then finished the guy off. It's about time to see a really bad Sith Lord instead of someone that's just an a-hole to people.


BTW, I think it would be cool if Ford did appear in the Boba Fett show (or Mandalorian) and face off with Boba Fett and somehow get revenge on him for taking him to Jabba. Obviously not kill Fett, but get revenge somehow.
 
"It was just business."

Also, if Crimson Dawn is in BoBF, Qir'a might show up. I'd love to see how Han reacts to that, given everything that's happened to him since. Including Leia. Bonus points if her arrival interrupts Han v. Boba, Han sees how far she's fallen, and has to team up with Boba to stop her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top