None of this stuff sounds like a bad thing to me.
I don't tend to take the "Kathleen Kennedy is the worst thing to ever happen to Star Wars" stuff especially seriously. I think she's been an effective shepherd for Lucasfilm, and she's good -- most of the time, Solo notwithstanding -- at making money. She is not a creative, though, and I think she is utterly lacking in creative vision. She knows how to make money, not content.
But the thing is, her approach to making money is no longer enough to sustain the franchise going forward. Yes, she can do individual projects and, 9 times out of 10 (that 1 being a Solo-level ****up, which, again, I rest ENTIRELY on her shoulders), and they will usually make money, but the industry has changed in the last 10-15 years, and the expense of making films that make money just...doesn't work anymore unless you also have a creative vision. Kevin Feige has been successful because, I think, he has largely understood how to have Marvel function with a coherent vision that is both money-making AND provides generally good, coherent content. Certainly the Marvel run leading up to Endgame was that. After that point, I think things got a bit too muddled, and I would expect a bunch of that was driven by the launch of Disney+ with Marvel's TV shows being an anchor for that. Plus, they picked a guy to be the centerpiece of their next "big bad" -- who by the way COULD have been amazing if you know the comics source info -- and it turned out he was...not a good person and toxic to the brand. But I digress.
Anyway, Kennedy isn't a content person. She's a money person. And what she did, which mostly worked, ain't working anymore. For the budgets involved, you can no longer get by on "Yes, the story isn't great, but look at all the money it made!" That is, ultimately, what I refer to as "eating your seed corn." You're basically sacrificing the long-term future of the franchise for short-term profit. What is required is someone with creative vision who can guide Star Wars through a larger overarching story. Filioni and Favreau have been good at this. Kennedy was lousy at this.
Now, to be clear, I think some of Kennedy's impulses were good and smart ones long-term. It makes perfect sense from a business perspective to try to broaden the appeal of Star Wars via representation, and I think it's morally a good thing to do. Rey, for example, could be a really, really interesting character, and they've tapped an immensely talented actor to embody that role. Daisy Ridley's got acting chops. Give her a good script and I have no doubt that she will knock it into the stratosphere.
I think Star Wars also needs to evolve some. There has got to be a move beyond the Imperial era and into something new. You can still tell stories within that era. I think we likely always will. But the timeline's gotta move forward, and the universe itself has to be allowed to change and grow. Otherwise, Star Wars will stagnate and wither. I'm hoping that Favreau and Filioni can do that. I think they've been good stewards thus far, and I have hope that they can be in the future.