So continuing my journey of trying comparing the most recent home video releases of the Star Wars films....
I remembered that in 2015 I bought the digital collection of the 6 films. And I downloaded them to an external hard drive. I realized this is the same versions of the films as the 2011 Blu-rays. And so with that realization, I sat down and compared the two versions.
The 4k definitely has cleaner, clearer image. But there are times I noticed the DNR kinda smudging out detail. Particularly on faces.
One of the biggest changes comes in the color. Ever since the Special Editions in 97. The OT has had been brightened and the colors have been made deeper and richer. Sometimes a little too rich when it comes to skin tone. But the sky is actually blue. The 4k has less color overall. Everything is much more pale. Which is more accurate to the original look of the film when it first came out. But it's kinda hard to go back. Particularly when Cloud City has look really vibrant in the past, with a deep blue skies and deep red torture room corridors.
So if your looking to get one of the newer releases of the movies. You'll be faced with a choice. Better clarity but poorer(in my opinion), but more true to the originals, colors. Slightly less clarity, but better, more vibrant colors.
And to use this as a springboard down a rabbit trail...
I had the fortune to see the original Star Wars trilogy films during their initial theatrical runs in the 1970s/1980s. And the thing I realize is... NONE of us saw them the exact same way back then. Despite the stereo tracks and monaural versions, did you see a 35mm print, or 16mm copy? How clean was the print? Was the theatrical projector aligned properly, and how many hours were on the bulb? Had the film been run for a few months with more accumulated dirt, scratches, hot spots, and fading, or was it a fresh print? How many reels were in the print, and were the negative copies each processed (probably by Kodak) sequentially in the same wash, to ensure consistency in the way they developed?
The way that I "remember" how Star Wars looked in 1977 at my local south Florida theater was most likely NOT the way it "looked" in downtown Miami or Fort Lauderdale. To me, the color palette was muted, with lots of 1970s earth tones. I remember at the finale/medal ceremony, a clean C3PO golden and bright, and R2D2 had a clean, crisp white bright body, but still with a satin finish dome. While as a child I always thought ANH Vader was just dark black in color, we all know now that he wasn't "glossy" at all, the helmet and armor were banged to hell from the production process, the face plate was gunmetal and black, the helmet dome was NOT glossy in ANH, etc.
As Yoda might say: "Consistent on film, the Original Trilogy was not."
So... trying to preserve the original look of the films before the digital era is elaborate archeology, but ultimately a "best guess" based on remaining film artifacts and digital conversions. And I am aware of the many SW film preservation/un-edits that have occurred over the years. For my money, Mike Verta probably has the "best" original restoration based on his unique and tedious methods, but we will never get to see it.