HeartBlade
Sr Member
Except Disney isn't gonna end those IPs for new stuff. They want to milk the pre-existing IPs as long as they can. It's the reason why they purchased LucasFilms and Star Wars to begin with, because they knew fans would be desperate to watch anything with the Star Wars name on it (and due to the sequel trilogy and the Galaxy's Edge attraction, they've learned that's not always true). As long as some Star Wars property is making money, they'll keep it going until there's nothing left of it. The same is true with Indiana Jones. Hell, they started doing live-action remakes of their successful cartoons because they're afraid to try new properties that might not bring in any money for them. It's just a matter of time before Disney will need to wake up and evolve or crash and burn. That decision is up to them. And as long as Baby Yoda keeps bringing in the cash, they're not gonna close down Star Wars any time soon. That's just the unfortunate truth about the whole thing.
We’re in agreement here. The reason Disney paid $4 billion for Lucasfilm is undoubtably for the rights to make Star Wars and Indiana Jones films and they are going to milk those franchises until the udders are dry and then some. They already made their money back apparently so any future milking is pure profit. Same reason they bought Marvel and had the MCU not taken off, we probably would have gotten constant reboots of Ironman, Captain America, etc if they were popular enough.
Not sure what you mean here. I was proposing a hypothetical ST that would occur 100 years or more after the OT instead of the ST we got so that we get to visit a new world (post-OT galaxy) where the OT’s legacy remains intact in that their revolution was successful but because they passed away due to old age, they can’t address the new emerging threat.I can believe that - halfway. Well, at least the first sentence. However, where if falls apart is that what you put out does worse than 'lose skwyalker', it kicks dirt all over it and leaves it behind. Rey adopting the name doesn't keep Skywalker alive when all indications are she has no desire to return to it. I mean, i could become a writer/director and adopt the name Sean Lucas (neither are part of my legal name, nor as far as know used by anyone in my extended family). Using that name doesn't connect me to George Lucas in any way shape or form. No one is going to go out and see my work because i use the last name Lucas. In fact, i'd get more negative feedback, i'm sure, when people ask the question if there's any relation and they find out there isn't, i just like GL's work.
No one really ever answered the question a number of people posed over the years, either. That question is, if you're bringing SW back and doing sequels, what is the point of dumping on the OT cast (and story as is the case with palps in 9) - when your biggest asset is the existing fanbase and that the fanbase with (by far) the most amount of money to spend on stuff is the OT fanbase? Rule number one of business, don't piss of the people with the money.
What executive looks at the stories presented and thinks that's great, everyone will love that? I mean, i had no interest in the Twilight books/movies. But if i'm an exec, i don't have a subsidiary starting a revival where to trash the stuff that came before. And to head of some people's arguments, it doesn't matter one bit if some people don't agree. The fact is a large segment of those fans will hate it. That's a no win situation. Why bother with it? Jump down the line and do a new thing.
Jump 100-1000 years forward or backward. There's nothing really official there to step on. Go there and do whatever you want. In the case of ST - i've said many a time, replace Han/Luke/Leia with three new people have the same basic jobs and what changes? Nothing. Nothing required Kylo to be a descendant of Anakin. Nothing required Han or Leia. Just someone from a good family who went bad and then everything largely plays out identically. I mean, really, we still didn't have loads of information about the Jedi after the PT. Just out 100 years and Luke can still be an aged master. Who says life isn't pro-longed by the force or he found a method to do just that? There's your OT tie in for fans, but lukes students have to do the lifting because of his age. it's more of a pro-longed cameo than anything else.
I agree that Rey “Skywalker” screws over the Skywalker legacy and the ST completely ruined Star Wars by basically making the Palpatines the victors. She has no lineage or affiliation with the Skywalkers (apart from the theory that Palpatine is Anakin’s dad which would then make her Ben’s aunt/cousin), received minimal training from them, and basically took everything that was Luke’s from his victory and feats to his actual property. Disney really screwed the pooch here and their aggressive stance against the fans certainly made things worse. When has it ever been a good idea to insult your top paying customers?