Obi-Wan's Revenge of the Sith lightsaber. How many variations are there?


IMG_2497.jpeg

You can see the copper tube they attached on the pommel. The threaded rod on the front would probably be the other point of balance.
IE, they had monofilament wound around the bar from above. As they pull the slack on the filament up it dramatically rolls the hilt before being picked up. Kind of in keeping with the blue fishing line….
Scrutinizing the auction photo on the Gillard hilt reveals some surface marking on the pommel where the tube would have been temporarily attached.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1906132
Some color modding here but primarily to highlight the notable differences between the hilts and their coloring. Propstore not helping with the way they light and crop things-
Also trying to keep the hilt angle relatively the same to poibt out differences in length features.
Rymo’s thread with photos of the exhibit hilt has muuuch better photos: just not the angle I need for the side by sides.

View attachment 1906106

*edited the list above, thanks for the guidance Teecrooz.

Adjusted for being re informed
Worth noting we don't officially know which hilt would be the ILM digital model reference, the MR reference being the current assumption.
So which one is in the Archive and shows up on the Star Wars website?

And just a slight aside, the Hasbro toy from 2005 has similar color scheme as the "ILM" version.
Possibly they sent photo references out of that hilt?
 
View attachment 1906291
View attachment 1906292
You can see the copper tube they attached on the pommel. The threaded rod on the front would probably be the other point of balance.
IE, they had monofilament wound around the bar from above. As they pull the slack on the filament up it dramatically rolls the hilt before being picked up. Kind of in keeping with the blue fishing line….
Scrutinizing the auction photo on the Gillard hilt reveals some surface marking on the pommel where the tube would have been temporarily attached.

Awesome. Thanks for the info!
 
Not sure if it has been asked but any idea what's going on with the pommel on the #373 prop? Would it have been chromed to match the rest of hilt or did it look like the #689/Gillard originally?
 
That gold neck is vexing.

99% of replicas just go with shiny brass, but the actual prop looks like either gold paint or brass with a matte clearcoat.
I talked to Steve Dymszo years ago about the props he examined in the archives while designing for MR and he said that a lot of the props had a dulling coat of something sprayed over them after AOTC.

I specifically remember him saying that the metal dooku saber looked like it had been sprayed with a matt clearcoat
 
I talked to Steve Dymszo years ago about the props he examined in the archives while designing for MR and he said that a lot of the props had a dulling coat of something sprayed over them after AOTC.

I specifically remember him saying that the metal dooku saber looked like it had been sprayed with a matt clearcoat

Hmmm.

Aside from a deliberately aesthetic choice, the only other reason I can see for doing that is to minimize bluescreen/greenscreen reflections.

As can be seen in the ROTS DVD features, they bit the bullet and went with a shiny gold Threepio suit...but then also had to digitally paint out all of those unwanted reflections of the crew, camera equipment, greenscreens, etc.

So, to avoid more headaches, they must've dulled down various props.
 
The matte clear has been a trick the industry has used for years

The tail light section of steve mcqueens bullitt mustang was sprayed clear, along with the stainless trim to try and avoid the shine and shimmer from the hot Cali sun

What steve dymszo’s comment makes total sense to me
 
I always thought this one had a brass and copper machined neck that had been polished with some scotchbrite to give it a satin sheen and then clear coatedView attachment 1906548
IMG_2384.jpeg

Turned brass and copper, smooth finish, a “touch” darkened, with matte clear. I agree,
somehow Rymo’s thread photos were the latest I had seen but the quality of these makes it pretty clear.
Matte clear is pretty common across theatre productions as well because of the stage lights doing the same thing, you don’t want those crazy hot spots/ refractions.
Clamp box, body, pommel, and emitter all turned metal, still scrutinizing the grenade and booster on this one though
 
Throwing it out there- this exhibit hilt is probably the basis for at least the pommel and clamp castings.
The only one with matching machined marks on the pommel (Tom’s cast middle)
IMG_2505.jpeg
 
Interesting. But, if I remember correctly, this pommel has a pilot hole and circular recess around it on the bottom. And Tom's casting is completely flat
 
My casting, as I understand it, is of a rubber master, it’s why there’s a crack/wrinkle on the bottom.

What if this aluminum master was molded for the rubber stunt and then someone molded the rubber stunt for whatever I have..
 
Back
Top