Yeah Im just going to put the fact that Michael Ardnt’s “treatments” were rejected like George Lucas and his scripts for 7 were vastly different from Abrams’ (nevermind he also had several ideas and the treatments were rough outlines at best).
I agree Collider came with an agenda by asking a loaded question. I think we just need to wait a couple more years until Kennedy retires and sells her tell-all book lol.
More untruths. George didn't write any scripts. He obviously had other ideas, for the ST, as seen in the "Star Wars Archives: Prequel Trilogy", but they weren't scripts. Lawrence Kasdan, calls them notes.
Secondly, the treatment that was publicly sold, by George, is one and the same as Michael Ardnt's treatment. It's not two different things.
Thirdly, the 40 to 50 page treatment that was written by Michael Ardnt with George Lucas, wasn't "rejected." It certainly, through the course of development began to depart of the original concept, to a degree. But that's pretty much standard fare with the development of any film. Look how different the original film from the initial concepts. (And I'm gonna plug The Star Wars comic, if you haven't read it. It's awesome look at what we could have gotten.) So Michael Ardnt turns the treatment shortly after the sale. Then immediately begins working on episode 7. He will write until late October 2013, assisted by Lawrence Kasdan and Simon Kinberg. Unable to meet the deadline, he bows out. With JJ Abrams taking over script writing duties. However he seems to remain as a consultant.
By the time he leaves a fair bit of the story beats were already written. By April Starkilller base is there.
This one from August.
And in October, there's the attack on the Jakku village.
This is just a sampling to give you an idea of where the story was before Michael Ardnt left. So any major change would have been of his doing.