They perfected surfaces that germs don't stick to. They spent all their time working on that instead of that anti-chip paint mentioned earlier.
I watched R1 over the weekend, and, wow, was the empire stupid.
Alternative being? Store them on the Imperial network? Or put them on multiple planets?I watched R1 over the weekend, and, wow, was the empire stupid.
-Lets store all our plans, essentially in hard copy, on one planet
-Lets stick them in a giant column where you have to manually grab a physical hard drive with a remote control and bring it to you...
-...at which point you have to find somewhere to plug it in to access it's contents.
-not to mention, you just need to break the glass and you could blast away tons of drives worth of data, but hey, it has a giant vault door!
-Anyone can seemingly climb to the very top of the tower where there's a convenient station there for you to plug in your drive and can email it wherever you like!
-If you need to adjust the dish, there's a giant plank extending way over the edge, just because!
-Why is a master communications switch outside, not really near anything, requiring no shred of security to access?
Seemed to me a well, in ANH, Tarkin didn't believe they found a flaw in the station, yet, he blows up the whole place to keep them from getting the plans.
That’s what I just thinking. Scarif has way more security measures then the Death Star!Well, let's face it. If you really want to nit-pick stupid plans, the OT is rife with them. None of it holds up under that kind of scrutiny.
Alternative being? Store them on the Imperial network? Or put them on multiple planets?
Well, let's face it. If you really want to nit-pick stupid plans, the OT is rife with them. None of it holds up under that kind of scrutiny.
Well, let's face it. If you really want to nit-pick stupid plans, the OT is rife with them. None of it holds up under that kind of scrutiny.
That’s what I just thinking. Scarif has way more security measures then the Death Star!![]()
Because it's totally okay to nit pick the new films. But how dare we nit pick the old films.......
Because the nitpicking always seems to be about the new movies, not the old. Nobody scrutinizes the OT's story or plots half as much as they do the new movies. Nobody talks about how half-baked Han's rescue from Jabba was. Nobody complains that ESB is ruined because the time framing makes no sense. And even if they do, these things get hand waved and justified. The truth is the OT seems to get a pass for anything, while everything else simply doesn't.You can nit pick all you want, whether new or old. I just find it interesting that in order to defend the new material some fans need to constantly pick apart the old ones.
But it this case, being Rogue One, it's different. Sure we can nit pick how the Imperials act in that movie. But at the same time are we going to ignore that in the ANH, the Imperials aren't much smarter? I mean you'd think someone would have have cut our heroes off instead of just chasing them. Don't they have security cameras and other kinds of sensors? And no back up systems for the tractor beams? No warning systems to tell them the power is down?The reason the minor flaws of the old movies are often explained away is because they are just that, minor, and aren't so glaring that they ruin the story being told. The criticisms of the new films are not nitpicks. Addressing major problems with the narrative or continuity of the new films in context to the old (this is a series after all) is the basis on which fans like me build my stance. That's not nitpicking. That's simply pointing out the lackluster writing, from which everything else trickles down.
I saw that you necroposted The Last Jedi thread to point out an observation about it. More power to you and Joek3rr for loving that movie and to any fan for enjoying the ST. I just wanted better for this story and I think they really dropped the ball.