Again this speaks to the mentality that Luke is some sort of manic-depressive darkside dabbler who goes in and out of fits of rage.
Hardly the the kind of hero people have admired for 40 plus years. Perhaps it's the inclusion of the ST into the Canon that has warped people's perception of the character so badly that they would think of Luke this way.
Blind acceptance because George or anyone else said so without considering valid reasoning to the contrary is intellectually dishonest. Besides, constantly referencing an unreliable source never bodes well in a debate because it undermines your stance.
I mean let's get real here, we're not clashing over politics or religion or anything truly serious. We're arguing over the merits of a fictional character's motivation. But at the least we can acknowledge that it's better to frame one's arguments based on the context of the films alone and not on the creator's intentions, which are constantly changing.
Hardly the the kind of hero people have admired for 40 plus years. Perhaps it's the inclusion of the ST into the Canon that has warped people's perception of the character so badly that they would think of Luke this way.
Blind acceptance because George or anyone else said so without considering valid reasoning to the contrary is intellectually dishonest. Besides, constantly referencing an unreliable source never bodes well in a debate because it undermines your stance.
I mean let's get real here, we're not clashing over politics or religion or anything truly serious. We're arguing over the merits of a fictional character's motivation. But at the least we can acknowledge that it's better to frame one's arguments based on the context of the films alone and not on the creator's intentions, which are constantly changing.
Last edited: