Status
Not open for further replies.
I have no disdain for them at all, they are human beings just like me...It's just sort of ironic to me on the surface( If you really want the cherry on top of your career you're going to have to pay for it...lol) but this is what they say it's for:



The adjacent property owners paid for the land for the first 1,500 stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Today, the cost of a star ceremony is covered by a sponsorship fee of $75,000. This fee covers the following costs:
  • Creation and installation of the star
  • Maintenance of the Walk of Fame
  • Permits
  • Police for off-duty officers
  • Fire department
  • Production costs
  • Barricade
  • Security
  • Photography
The Hollywood Historic Trust is responsible for maintaining the Walk of Fame and the floral arrangements. They receive a portion of the sponsorship fee to cover these costs.

I’ve done “the tourist thing” a couple of times, when visiting relatives in the area. My most lingering memories of the Walk of Fame area are how filthy and rundown the area is…just depressingly nasty.
 
Last edited:
I’ve done “the tourist thing” a couple of times, when visiting relatives in the area. My most lingering memories of the Walk of Fame area are how filthy and rundown the area is…just depressingly nasty.
I'm getting depressed just thinking about it , but you know what? It might end up being for the best for the actor/actress to actually contemplate their life...was this star worth it? Is this all there is? Etc.
 
I've wondered what the PT would have looked like if the movies had been made a generation before the OT.

If you space them out with the correct fictional timeline from ANH then it takes them back pretty far. That puts Ep#1 in about 1945, which might be too early. It might not get the budget & spectacle that the movie requires.

But if the PT movies were all filmed only 3 years apart (like they really were in 1999-2005) then you could fit the whole PT into the 'Ben-Hur' and 'Cleopatra' era. That seems fitting for their epic tone and SFX.


It would also be interesting to see 'Solo' and 'Rogue One' being made in the early/mid-1970s leading up to ANH. It seems fitting for the tone of those times, particularly RO.
IMG_8352.jpeg
 
So...you're describing the actual physical place right? Could it be an appropriate metaphor? You're not talking about Hollywood in general?

Not to mention, you get walked on the rest of your life...lol. To me, it was a bad idea from the start. Now i'm going to have to research this...lol.

Maybe they should have named it Main Street Mos Eisley. Could Lucas have been referring to Hollywood when he came up with the concept of Mos Eisley? I seriously don't know...just a thought stirred in my mind.

Funny enough, if I remember correctly, Muhammad Ali was the only celebrity to ask to not have his star placed on the sidewalk so instead they placed it on the wall of the building it was going to be next to. At the time I thought why do you have to be different and ruin the flow? Now, I think he was actually right.

The oddest part is, having a star on The Walk of Fame in Hollywood, while an "accomplishment".... certain areas are a skeezy, weird/dirty environment. Kind of like having an honorary plaque for your career mounted on the wall outside the men's toilet.

Walk of shame? Survey describes Hollywood Walk of Fame as ‘grubby' and ‘unsafe'

Yeah, unfortunately it's not as glamorous as the impression you get from watching movies and TV. I'm sure it was something back in the 30s, 40s, and 50s. Now, it's fairly worn down. The block of Hollywood & Highland where the Chinese theater, Kodak theater, and El Capitan theater is still kept relatively clean. And the old art deco buildings around it are nice but it's basically those couple of blocks. The rest of Hollywood Blvd isn't glamorous at all.

Hollywood is a lot like its inhabitants. Looks glamorous from a distance but not so pretty when you get close. That's not to say there are not nicer parts like the Hancock Park area as well as closer to the hills. Move further west toward Beverly Hills and it gets nicer. But yeah, most of it is pretty typical worn down LA. I can't really say "rundown" since it's obviously still a vibrant place. Driving through the heart of Hollywood is basically 5 blocks of nothing special and then you'll see a landmark, then repeat. I used to love going there when I was a kid and into my 20s. Nowadays I have no patience for the congestion or the people.

I've been there. They make it look glamorous on television and in the movies, but the actual area is a total dump. A lot of the strip looks like a Hot Topic store, just with more trash on the streets.

If you go north to Pasadena there are some nicer areas.

I love Pasadena! Used to go to Old Town Pasadena a lot. When it comes to LA, now I'm all about just sticking to the outskirts. Pasadena, Burbank, etc. I can't do Hollywood, Downtown, West side anymore. The traffic and overall busyness ends up being more of a hassle than a pleasure. All the crime isn't helping either. I used to love going to Dodger games, going to concerts, maybe catch a movie at the Chinese but now it's just a headache to do. These days, I just stick to my beloved suburbs and that's all I want lol.
 
Last edited:
Funny enough, if I remember correctly, Muhammad Ali was the only celebrity to ask to not have his star placed on the sidewalk so instead they placed it on the wall of the building it was going to be next to. At the time I thought why do you have to be different and ruin the flow? Now, I think he was actually right.



Yeah, unfortunately it's not as glamorous as the impression you get from watching movies and TV. I'm sure it was something back in the 30s, 40s, and 50s. Now, it's fairly worn down. The block of Hollywood & Highland where the Chinese theater, Kodak theater, and El Capitan theater is still kept relatively clean. And the old art deco buildings around it are nice but it's basically those couple of blocks. The rest of Hollywood Blvd isn't glamorous at all.

Hollywood is a lot like its inhabitants. Looks glamorous from a distance but not so pretty when you get close. That's not to say there are not nicer parts like the Hancock Park area as well as closer to the hills. Move further west toward Beverly Hills and it gets nicer. But yeah, most of it is pretty typical worn down LA. I can't really say "rundown" since it's obviously still a vibrant place. Driving through the heart of Hollywood is basically 5 blocks of nothing special and then you'll see a landmark, then repeat. I used to love going there when I was a kid and into my 20s. Nowadays I have no patience for the congestion or the people.



I love Pasadena! Used to go to Old Town Pasadena a lot. When it comes to LA, now I'm all about just sticking to the outskirts. Pasadena, Burbank, etc. I can't do Hollywood, Downtown, West side anymore. The traffic and overall busyness ends up being more of a hassle than a pleasure. All the crime isn't helping either. I used to love going to Dodger games, going to concerts, maybe catch a movie at the Chinese but now it's just a headache to do. These days, I just stick to my beloved suburbs and that's all I want lol.
Reminds me of DC. I live just outside the city and driving through DC is like...slums...slums...MASSIVELY WEALTHY Neighborhood, slums, slums, 6 blocks of HUGE magnificent buildings, some of which are iconic works of art in their own right, and two blocks away "LOCK THE DOORS! DONT STOP THE CAR!!!"
 
Ali wanted his star on the wall because the name 'Muhammed' isn't supposed to be stepped on, mocked, or treated 'irreverently'.

Just ask the workers at Charlie Hebdo.
 
Ali wanted his star on the wall because the name 'Muhammed' isn't supposed to be stepped on, mocked, or treated 'irreverently'.

Just ask the workers at Charlie Hebdo.

Ah, that explains it.

Here's a fun bit of trivia...

There are five categories in which to have a star on the Walk of Fame:

Motion Pictures
Broadcast Television
Audio Recording or Music
Broadcast Radio
Theater/Live Performance

(Sports Entertainment was added in 2023 but I'm not including it)

Some celebrities have stars in more than one category. There's only one who has a star in every original category. Can you guess who it is? (NO INTERNET SEARCHING!!!)
 
Last edited:
Reminds me of DC. I live just outside the city and driving through DC is like...slums...slums...MASSIVELY WEALTHY Neighborhood, slums, slums, 6 blocks of HUGE magnificent buildings, some of which are iconic works of art in their own right, and two blocks away "LOCK THE DOORS! DONT STOP THE CAR!!!"

It's definitely not as bad as the rest of LA which looks like a third world.
 
Ah, that explains it.

Here's a fun bit of trivia...

There are five categories in which to have a star on the Walk of Fame:

Motion Pictures
Broadcast Television
Audio Recording or Music
Broadcast Radio
Theater/Live Performance

(Sports Entertainment was added in 2023 but I'm not including it)

Some celebrities have stars in more than one category. There's only one who has a star in every original category. Can you guess who it is? (NO INTERNET SEARCHING!!!)

Christopher Lee?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top