I also feel nuance has taken a strong backseat in media, much to its deteriment.
I know art is "political", entertainment is "political" and reflects the beliefs of the creator. Thats fine and I can enjoy a work or try to understand a creator's message even if I dont agree with it. If its well done, at least it will make me think more from their point of view.
What I find common and really disturbing is how blatant and heavy-handed the message being sent is now. I dont feel like Im enjoying a story that is open to interpretation and allows me to connect the threads but rather being beaten over the head with an anvil on what I SHOULD like and feel and what is RIGHT and WRONG. Nevermind the fact that Hollywood is in its own ivory tower that does not actually reflect reality so the message comes off as hollow.
I dont watch new Star Wars content anymore so cant contribute to discussion on new things but one of the few shows I have been watching (the Boys) has honestly ruined one of my favorite characters with season 4. I do hate the message that "everyone is evil and has some darkness in their past, everyone thinks they are the hero and there is no good or evil."
Going into spoilers a little but one of the good supes is revealed to have been a bully and a b#$%$ due to her past as a pageant contestant, causing another bad guy supe to justifiably hate her after she spread a pretty terrible rumor that made her lose access to the paegent circuit. My big issue with this is that this character is supposed to be the quintissential "good person," that people who legitimately want to be super heroes and help exist and not just abuse their power for personal gain. That good people fundamentally exist and that they should be the ones we root for and put in power. The sudden twist in her backstory suddenly also makes her a "flawed person" and not "wholly good" and "admirable," a pretty big departure from her characterization in the first 3 seasons.
Stories need a "good guy" to root for. I also dont think genuinely good people only exist in fiction. I know there are tons of firefighters, police officers, volunteers, and other genuinely good people that are doing good things and dont have a backstory of abusing people or being genuinely evil in their past that they are making amends for. In fact, I do think most people are genuinely good and try to do good. Maybe its thanks to social media and the fact that alot of "famous" people tend to be dicks in real life but the vast majority of people arnt "social media" or "hollywood" famous and the vast majority of people arnt dicks. The quote is "the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." To me, this always meant to me that there is always a majority of good people over evil people and evil only wins if good people choose to do nothing because if they actually took a stand, evil would easily be outnumbered. It is sad how media seems to push a "everyone is somewhat evil and evil is just a point of view" as opposed to actually celebrating heroes.
As much as I enjoy movies and television, Hollywood is so out of touch with reality that I have no respect whatsoever for any of their moral posturing. It's obnoxious.
What it boils down to is that there are very few, if any, true aspirational heroes in much of popular television shows and film. While the literary term hero is thrown around a lot, obviously referring to the protagonist of the story, that doesn't automatically mean that this person is someone to be admired. Often they really shouldn't be admired at all.
True heroism is self
LESSness. Less me. More you. So much of what's being perpetuated is the magnification of self, at the expense of everything else. My identity. My happiness. My worldview. My experience. My wants and desires. Art naturally reflects the attitudes and beliefs of those who create it, so when your directors, writers, and actors are self absorbed, the work reflects that because the public is obsessed with themselves. Social media plays a huge role in this issue.
The problem then becomes a matter of mistaking character flaws as being virtuous, instead of challenges that the protagonist must overcome. They'll assume that because we can all relate to a character flaw, that this is what we ought to celebrate, when we should be celebrating that character being victorious over it. Relating to common problems creates empathy with an audience, but unless a protagonist can see the error of their ways, or muster the strength to work through those things, your fictional hero really isn't much of a hero.
This is why so much of the material out there feels empty and the journeys these fictional people go on end up hollow because there was no struggle at all. They just embraced those flawed aspects of their personality, never learn any lessons, never change as a result and instead of recognizing they can grow if they set aside their own needs for the sake of others, they remain exactly the same as how they started off at the beginning of the journey. Without a catharsis for the audience, you've left them feeling like they wasted their time.
Too many writers are ignoring universalism which finds commonality in the basic human experience, regardless of identity. They put the focus on self (whether it's the protagonist of a story, or the author writing it) when real heroes are willing to self sacrifice for a righteous cause, or to save someone's life/ ideals. The disconnect is astounding. Entertainment by its very definition is about other people. You can make a point about a political subject or cause you feel passionate about, but unless you have the skills to do it in a way that will allow an audience to be pulled into the fiction you've created, and trusting them to understand it without having to explain it to them outright, then you really ought to consider trying a different medium.
Persuasive thesis papers are really great for spelling out your ideas clearly without having to couch them in flowery language or fiction. A lot of these writers need to stick to theses, editorial journalism, or political commentary. They're not talented enough to skillfully make their point known through fiction. Recognizing your strengths is really difficult when you've got several generations now of people who were raised to think that everything they do is exceptional and that they're entitled to say or do whatever they want without consequence.