It pains me to bring this up, but the four lights/five lights thing is boosted directly from the film version of 1984. Except it’s Richard Burton torturing John Hurt. In the book O’Brien does it with his fingers—I guess they thought lights would be more cinematic.I think this scene pretty well describes the Kurzman era of Star Trek.
They often cheated Spock’s closeups when he was standing next to the captain’s chair, so that the background would be his bridge station instead of just the empty stage If they shot him with accurate geography.
Hah! Very well done. STC is the only Trek fan production I’ve seen so far that is even watchable, let alone really good, and some of them are excellent. My favorite was the Mirror, Mirror sequel. I thought it was very impressive. Obviously I haven’t seen every fan production, but so far every one I’ve seen apart from STC has been pretty much unwatchable. Apart from STC, the SW fan films have us beat hands down in terms of quality. I’ve seen some SW fan films that were uncannily good.I absolutely LOVE that stuff. Happens all the time in TOS and I much enjoy spotting it. I've learned to try to "read the room" in online discussions, however, because some people react to things like this being pointed out as disrespecting the material or "ruining" the illusion, or other such nonsense.
We did that on Star Trek Continues, such as this shot:
View attachment 1595154
In story, Smith back there is at the next station over from Spock's, which canon-ish plans name as the "Sub Systems Checkout Station". To her left is the "Defense Systems Monitor Station", which is in a part of the bridge that was never built on the STC set. So for this shot they sat her on the other side of the bridge and made sure eyelines, etc., were correct.
Red arrow points to where the camera is pointing in story. Yellow points to where it's pointing on set.
View attachment 1595156
(the set later gained the viewscreen section, long after STC wrapped)
I absolutely LOVE that stuff. Happens all the time in TOS and I much enjoy spotting it. I've learned to try to "read the room" in online discussions, however, because some people react to things like this being pointed out as disrespecting the material or "ruining" the illusion, or other such nonsense.
We did that on Star Trek Continues, such as this shot:
View attachment 1595154
In story, Smith back there is at the next station over from Spock's, which canon-ish plans name as the "Sub Systems Checkout Station". To her left is the "Defense Systems Monitor Station", which is in a part of the bridge that was never built on the STC set. So for this shot they sat her on the other side of the bridge and made sure eyelines, etc., were correct.
Red arrow points to where the camera is pointing in story. Yellow points to where it's pointing on set.
View attachment 1595156
(the set later gained the viewscreen section, long after STC wrapped)
Which, in turn, was provoked by that Axanar ***hole poking CBS in the eye with a stick…I agree. If CBS hadn’t enacted the ban, we could have gotten more high quality TOS episodes from Continues.
My favorite thing about doing it was always destruction. Blowing up cars and such. When we shot Freefall on Vice, there was a trailer that gets shot up and then collapses, and that was amazing. Sadly all my copious photos of that gag are in storage.Yes, I love all of the clever tricks used to keep a production running smoothly. Film is about the art of illusion, after all, and, when people are doing their jobs well, you really have to pay attention to catch (and appreciate) those clever little shortcuts.
Kind of hard to tell when he gets lost in the great chasm that's supposed to be his quarters. I mean, living on something the size of a holodeck is supposed to be for the Picard series, right?I’m watching Stranger Things 4, which is vastly better written than Strange New Hair. There’s a very old rule in screenwriting. It’s been ascribed to various sources over the decades and appeared in many variations, but the formulation has never changed. It goes like this: In the first act, chase your hero up a tree. In the second act, keep throwing rocks at him. In the third act, get him back down.
If SNH actually had a hero instead of a cook and lead bartender, they might have put him in peril by now. ST4 is doing that to Eleven, and in spades. It’s so well done it’s difficult to watch, especially since Millie Bobby Brown is giving an amazing performance, and in some scenes she’s so convincing, and her situation is so agonizing, I can’t watch.
I had no idea if Anson Mount was any kind of an actor before SNH, and I still don’t. Thanks to the bottom-of-the-barrel writing staff snoozing their way through the season and phoning in their stories, I may never find out.
The bridge on Rios’ Stargazer was smaller than Pike’s quarters.Kind of hard to tell when he gets lost in the great chasm that's supposed to be his quarters. I mean, living on something the size of a holodeck is supposed to be for the Picard series, right?
On TNG Scotty's impressed that even an admiral in his day wouldn't have had quarters the size of those the Ent-D officers have and yet Pike has this apartment that's big enough for its own zip code!The bridge on Rios’ Stargazer was smaller than Pike’s quarters.
This is supposed to be the same ship Kirk takes command of later.
It makes me wonder if they are going to slowly replace all the crew until they promote Pike off the ship and we have TOS.I’m guessing with Hemmer gone, we now have room for Scotty.
Even if that happens, whatever they end up with, it won’t be recognizable as TOS.It makes me wonder if they are going to slowly replace all the crew until they promote Pike off the ship and we have TOS.
He was worse than James Cawley as Kirk!Was that seriously Jim Kirk, or was that Ace Ventura pretending to be Jim Kirk?
[/SPOILER/]
He's also way to scrawny to be Kirk! He looked there like he ran few bouts with a tapeworm!He was worse than James Cawley as Kirk!