Well, it looks like Art has made a decision on the MRG and how the RPF will proceed, so we can step back as the decision has been handed down :thumbsup
Last edited:
Amy is part of the new Master Replicas Group if that matters to the board or anyone.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It seems all too common in this community, that the mentality is "he didn't steal my money, so I am cool with him". Then they chastise you with "Well, you should have done your homework on the seller". They ONLY care once they have been scammed and then they grab their pitchforks.
Plus, he mentioned the companies he will be dealing with... Nasa, Warners, etc. I say, hit them up with emailed links to threads that show who he is.
Yes we know that, what is NOT known is if she knows that Steve owes people money or Product here and was banned for the non delivery of such.
Seriously?! She even responded after being told that she knew noting about Steve's wrongdoings. Dude, yes, she knows. Do you think with this new knowledge she will quit the company as to not be as associated with this thief? Of course not. She just wants that paycheck.
Amy is scum just like Steve is.
So you are telling me you KNOW without a DOUBT what she knows :lol
I give people the benefit of the doubt untill proven otherwise.
Bottom line as Luuke pointed out MR never defrauded anyone at least none that I know of.
If you do post the incident.
Is Amy guilty by association?
I would have to say yes but that is up to the Mods and Art to decide.
Where you ARE wrong is calling her Scum, Steve yes.
Amy provided excellent customer service back when MR was up and running and deserves better from you :unsure
I'm sorry you feel that way.
My opinion stands.
It;s alright Bro I feel sorry for you that you have to slander someone who is simply guilty by association
That doesn't mean squat. If you found out a new upcoming company was taking investors, and you find out the CEO was a convicted felon known for fraud.... would you invest? Just because the rest of the company have employees with a lot invested in the endeavor, would you trust them? I suspect not. If Carl Cunningham, who stole from Rancho Obiwan, became CEO of a new toy company selling collectible toys, would you just shrug his past off, all because there might be some other employees who are invested and need the job? If you were putting your child in daycare and the owner of the place was convicted for child molestation, but the rest of the employees "seem cool" and they really need the job to be a success... would you leave your child with them? Fact is... the head of a company and CEO has A LOT of influence on how people view the company and how they trust it to be run.