I’d love a static reveal board!
Just putting this out there, apologies if this has been pointed out before, but I'm 90% sure the triangles in the cave scene are rotoscoped. This suggests that the ones on the actual prop weren't functional. I was actually looking to see if I could spot any wires going up Hamill's sleeve, but on closer inspection, it looks as though the lights were almost certainly added in post. If they were actually lit, you'd expect them to cast some light on to the hilt body and the black buttons. Especially in a dark environment. Just a thought anyway. Not sure if it's been pointed out before?
I don't mean to muddy the waters or anything. Certainly don't intend to undermine what you're doing either. Understand why they need to be lit in the MoM. I'm just interested in getting to the truth of the original prop. It wouldn't be the first time I've seen something that isn't there. I'm fairly convinced with this though. I'd expect at least some reflection on some of the surfaces. There isn't any though. Even when the hilt is in the shade. I'd at least expect to see some light reflected on the underside of the rail? Now that I've seen it, I can't unsee it. It doesn't even look like particularly good/polished rotoscoping, which kind of matches the blade at the end of the shot (which wasn't great). It's almost like when a layer is set to the wrong blend mode in photoshop. It just doesn't look convincing to me.I’ve got some parts coming soon that I’ll need to put together but will hopefully illustrate how all the lights and power could have fit in the control box itself.
Regarding lighting, and rotoscoping I’ll have to respectfully disagree.
Mark’s movements in the box and the way the corresponding lighting pattern shows up is indicative of practicals; which I hope I can show soon.
I’ll also put forward that the side lighting in the room reflecting on the aluminum body would have been strong enough to overcome the ambient glow from the arrows, but not the direct light output from the arrows themselves.
I say this because even a low voltage led will show up very well on camera as a direct light source, but wouldn’t be able to compete with natural, full spectrum secondary light source on the surfaces
that is another item I hope I can practically replicate in-camera
Well. I stand corrected! Lol. I'd agree that it looks rotoscoped over the top too. There's just something about the glow that doesn't look natural. No denying there's a reflection there though. Thanks for the effort and apologies for wasting your time. Great work.Very subtle secondary reflection on the hilt body underneath. More noticeable here with the red wavelength; or because the green area is hit with a more intense light.
I wouldn’t put it past them to have roto’d on top of it though.
Perhaps the light was so dim they did choose to amp it up
Don’t apologize!Well. I stand corrected! Lol. I'd agree that it looks rotoscoped over the top too. There's just something about the glow that doesn't look natural. No denying there's a reflection there though. Thanks for the effort and apologies for wasting your time. Great work.
Couldn't have put it better myself!Don’t apologize!
When folks put tough questions/hypothesis/theories forward I’m just trying to challenge and get under the surface of the question regardless...
If the questions aren’t posed then we’re also not challenged to dig deeper![]()
Is it not 100% established that the hero and the Yuma are the same body? I thought it was. I'm sure I've seen an image of the Yuma that had the same scratch on the black part of the neck that is on the Hero today. I'll see if I can dig it out. Sure it was a shot of the sail barge scene.It was noted in the other (MoM of all) thread that marks on the body increase the probability of a solid hilt?
Super interesting to me, as the possible connection to the Yuma sabers is still in my mind. I said over there I have yet to see any blade retention system other than the nipple set screw which makes me skeptical still.
It totally is.Is it not 100% established that the hero and the Yuma are the same body? I thought it was. I'm sure I've seen an image of the Yuma that had the same scratch on the black part of the neck that is on the Hero today. I'll see if I can dig it out. Sure it was a shot of the sail barge scene.
Yeah, it turns out it was this old chestnut. That mark on the black part of the neck is still there on the hero by the looks of it. Or it's a remarkable coincidence (which isn't impossible).It totally is.
Even the box is the same one
I have some indicators of that but I really need to do a writeup for it to make sense
no kidding? wild - the radiused corners are a very good observation too, I hadn't thought of thatYeah, it turns out it was this old chestnut. That mark on the black part of the neck is still there on the hero by the looks of it. Or it's a remarkable coincidence (which isn't impossible).