Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds like you are the one who is dismissive if you really believe new fans are going to be confused by a very simple timeline. I have more faith in newcomers attracted to Star Wars. I believe they will be open and optimistic unlike the small group of so called “fans” that are bitter and pessimistic because they didn’t get a old EU book like the Crystal Star made into a movie. Or because Lucasfilm didn’t listen to the brainchilds on the internet that know better but somehow have no life.

That... and your own conflicting statement says more about you than it does about Star Wars.


I guess you wanted to add this one in as well since I'm a "fan"
 
Sounds like you are the one who is dismissive if you really believe new fans are going to be confused by a very simple timeline. I have more faith in newcomers attracted to Star Wars. I believe they will be open and optimistic unlike the small group of so called “fans” that are bitter and pessimistic because they didn’t get a old EU book like the Crystal Star made into a movie. Or because Lucasfilm didn’t listen to the brainchilds on the internet that know better but somehow have no life.

That... and your own conflicting statement says more about you than it does about Star Wars.

Not combative huh?
 
38srs3.jpg

:lol: (y)
 
because they didn’t get a old EU book like the Crystal Star made into a movie. Or because Lucasfilm didn’t listen to the brainchilds on the internet that know better but somehow have no life.

Does anybody know a good way of monetising this? Like a swear box so that every time someone uses this argument a pound is put in and eventually we can get beers from that or something?
 
If your talking about the bit of EU books and internet trolls, I made general comment about non specific hypothetical individuals. I find it interesting you assume it is about you but I leave that up to you to work through.

If I said anything else to harsh your sparkle, I sincerely apologize.
 
If your talking about the bit of EU books and internet trolls, I made general comment about non specific hypothetical individuals. I find it interesting you assume it is about you but I leave that up to you to work through.

If I said anything else to harsh your sparkle, I sincerely apologize.
I didn’t assume it was about me, I just think it’s a superlazy card to pull to dismiss criticism.
 
If your talking about the bit of EU books and internet trolls, I made general comment about non specific hypothetical individuals. I find it interesting you assume it is about you but I leave that up to you to work through.

If I said anything else to harsh your sparkle, I sincerely apologize.
You can't harsh the sparkle brother, it lives on regardless of revisionist history. ;)
49ce550dfe8e9c4f4e01c4d4552caf00.png
 
If your talking about the bit of EU books and internet trolls, I made general comment about non specific hypothetical individuals. I find it interesting you assume it is about you but I leave that up to you to work through.

If I said anything else to harsh your sparkle, I sincerely apologize.

I didn't feel it was aimed at me so much as as at Big Daddy. But to each their own. I appreciate the gesture. I say that without sarcasm.
 
Sounds like you are the one who is dismissive if you really believe new fans are going to be confused by a very simple timeline. I have more faith in newcomers attracted to Star Wars. I believe they will be open and optimistic unlike the small group of so called “fans” that are bitter and pessimistic because they didn’t get a old EU book like the Crystal Star made into a movie. Or because Lucasfilm didn’t listen to the brainchilds on the internet that know better but somehow have no life.

That... and your own conflicting statement says more about you than it does about Star Wars.

I really hope you're just poking people and don't really think there is one SW fan who wanted a Crystal Star movie! That's low man...
tEToMcO.gif
 
I'm compiling a lot of off-topic stuff from other threads here. I despise how lightsabers and their construction are presented as working. It's largely West End Games' fault, and their lack of reading comprehension. At the time, there was a policy in the new material coming out in what we now call the Star Wars Renaissance that new additions couldn't contradict existing works. So all of WEG's errors got propegated for years. The two biggest are the Five Mile Fallacy (a horrible misinterpretation of the size of a Super Star Destroyer) and the Jewel Fallacy (that lightsabers are optical phenomena focused through a jewel -- later a crystal -- in its guts).

More and more garbage has gotten piled on top of that, from red lightsabers being due to corrupting the crystals to them being able to be used to fly. But it all started with them misunderstanding Alan Dean Foster's description of the early lightsabers before the flash handles got brought in. The "jewel-like controls" were on the outside of the saber, on the dull reverse of a polished disc the blade sprang from. They somehow read it as the jewels being on the inside of the 'saber. And no new works could conflict with that.

I have no problem with a kyber crystal being necessary to amplify the power coming from the power cell, but the blade is not light, and it is not focused through the crystal. The rest of that scene in I, Jedi where Corran makes his inadvertently with a fake gem in the focusing array (*shudder*) has the lightsaber failing when the blade slags the fake gem. That's what would happen to any crystal the blade was actually in contact with. It doesn't work.

I'm okay with some of the rituals, that Jedi can wield a lightsaber better if they're attuned to it, that they can submerge themselves in the Force to achieve machine-like precision in aligning components... But not that it's essential for a Jedi to be able to use one at all. A custom, individual, master-crafted 'saber makes a lot of sense, but there are machine-made ones out there, too -- maybe not mass-produced, but enough to supply all the Younglings and have spares on hand for Jedi who lose them (lightsabers, not hands).

More later. In other news, Coca-Cola is canon.
 
Hahaha. Sorry that line about the Jedi losing hands reminds me of the video Joek3rr posted a few pages back with Obi-Wan talking to Luke.

"the Jedi retirement homes were full of amputees."

thank you again for posting that one man! It still cracks me up! :lol:
 
More and more garbage has gotten piled on top of that, from red lightsabers being due to corrupting the crystals to them being able to be used to fly. But it all started with them misunderstanding Alan Dean Foster's description of the early lightsabers before the flash handles got brought in. The "jewel-like controls" were on the outside of the saber, on the dull reverse of a polished disc the blade sprang from. They somehow read it as the jewels being on the inside of the 'saber. And no new works could conflict with that.
To be fair the "making the crystal bleed" bull*** is new Disney-canon. So is using your lightsaber as helicopter rotors...I went into a hysterical laughing fit when I first saw that and I'm pretty sure I'm plenty closer to a six-pack after that workout sesion of my belly...:rolleyes:


I'm not sure why galaxy's edge is on here. It's not a movie.
Well, the Terminator 2 ride was regarded as canon apparently so whatever goes I guess. I'm pretty sure most of us decide what to take as canon ourselves.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top