Kathleen Kennedy faces perhaps her biggest challenge since George Lucas chose her to shepherd 'Star Wars': figuring out what's next for the franchise.
www.latimes.com
Best bit from this story:
“I think it gives us a more open-ended view of storytelling and doesn’t lock us into this three-act structure,” she said. “We’re not going to have some finite number and fit it into a box. We’re really going to let the story dictate that.”
I cannot tell you how happy I am to see that. Even if they're still wary about it, or aren't sure how/when to do that, the notion that "Hey, maybe trilogies aren't the way to go..." is even on the drawing board is fantastic news.
Here's the truth: much as I love the original trilogy.....trilogies suck. They suck because they force you to condense your storytelling in unnatural ways. For that matter, going into a story with a finite
quantity of time to tell the story is, I think, a bass-ackwards way of storytelling. Nobody starts a novel by saying "Ok, I'm only allowed to have [#] chapters, so what kind of story can I fit into that?" You write the story out, then figure out how to break it into bite-sized pieces. I think only television shows really do this, and I think it only ends up working because they have a good bit more story to work with over 8/10/13/16/22 episodes. But even then, it makes more sense to figure out what your story is, and then -- if you have to -- to determine how to contain that within the alotted time, not to start from "Ok, so we're going to do a trilogy....what's each movie about?"
I'm currently fully prepared for Rise of the Skywalker to be deeply unsatisfying precisely because it'll try to wrap everything up too neatly, and will probably do it in (1) a ham-fisted way, and (2) a very recycled-feeling way. I have zero faith in Abrams to be able to bring this all to a satisfying conclusion, and I fully expect he'll s*** the bed by basically making this his fan version of ROTJ. I hope he'll prove me wrong, but...I don't have a lot of faith he will.
And you know why that is? Partially it's because I think Abrams is a pretty underwhelming storyteller who is better at aping style than he is at actually crafting narrative, but partially it's because we're stuck with this trilogy concept. At the end of TLJ, I thought the story could have continued for anywhere from 2-4 more films. You could do a TON of stuff that would be interesting with these characters and this setting and the state of affairs where we are when the thing ends. But instead, I'm betting Abrams will do a small time-skip, say "two years later..." and then have it seem like the Rebels have suddenly pulled together a big fleet to fight the New Empire's latest super-duper-ooper Death Star v5.0 weapon or whatever.