E-Wan
Sr Member
Yea, I'm sure it's happened before, but I've never actually seen so much whining about the minute details of a prop before.
REALLY? There's this dude from Star Wars - Dark Something - and he has this helmet...
Yea, I'm sure it's happened before, but I've never actually seen so much whining about the minute details of a prop before.
OK... So, now that a spokesman for Dorling Kindersley has confirmed that there was a printing error in the colour rendering that turned the picture of the grey Sonic yellow, & there are still no screen grabs or photo stills of a heritage gold prop, can someone please tell me what the 'official screen accurate' MFX prop is a replica of exactly?
Surely now someone will put their hands up & admit that there's been a wee bit of a deception going on? Come on its only fair to those who bought one and so adamantly defended MFX's corner!
They got the colour wrong. I'd hardly call that a minor innacuracy, especially for the money (though I know some got it a lot cheaper than those those of us who paid in advance and had to wait months on the pre-order coming through).
This is the RPF, and this is what we do. Risu, do you not strive for accuracy in the costume pieces you put together? I've seen plenty of your posts trying to to get the minutest details of that damn tie :lol
For an alleged "fan" of the show I don't think it would hurt either the likes of you or CT to start showing a little respect to a major contributor of said show instead of continuously posting big F.U comments to the team. These aren't made in some Chinese sweat shop on behalf of a company that has no connection with the franchise they sell.
I'm not saying don't discuss accuracy but to start accusing MFX of deception is a bit much.
I think that the respect should have been given to the customers who were buying the product. Don't advertise something as one thing when its not! If that had happened then there would be no debate. Being a fan of the show doesn't stop me from pointing out facts that are incorrect .
Chinese Sweat shop? Is that anotheer correct fact? Be careful there!
Why should I have to repaint something I paid nearly £300 for? :confused
Apart from anything else, as you well know, and Neil acknowledged early in the process, the Plastikote crackle is extremeley difficult to apply to obtain the correct finish. It's hit and miss at best.
Not only that, but repainting an item like this would seriously effect resale value.
As Mooneye states, I don't think MFX have shown a great deal of respect for the customer by selling a replica prop at a high price that was basically 'not as advertised', and continued to avoid answering questions regarding certain choices that were made in building this piece that have left it far from being what they claim it was to be.
I've seen people repaint Master Replica items that cost nearly £1000. You don't like it then sell it and buy something you do like.
OK... I started this thread, so I would like some courtesy here and have some of my questions answered if possible by all of you who know so much.
1-What were they selling for in US dollars and what are they selling for now?
2-Is there any US seller who sells the Plasti-kote Crackle paint?
Thanks
Again, why should I have to?
This was sold on the basis of being an exact replica, in every detail, of the studio used prop. It blatantly isn't. How could it be so difficult to get the right colour, when the correct one is in the same range, and obviously matches the colour used from the start?
And, again, have you ever tried using the stuff to accurateley replicate the effect on the original prop? I have. It ain't easy. I've tried it a lot on home builds, and never got a result I was wholly happy with. Neil Gorton himself stated that many of the replicas were repeatedly stripped and redone, and more than a few buyers have reported not entireley satisfactory paint-jobs on their MFX.
So am I going to attempt to repaint my supposedly 100% accurate MFX replica - not a chance.
Could I sell it? - probably.
Would I get what I paid for it? - unlikeley.
Should MFX have got the paintjob, emitter windows, blue cap and *COLOUR* right in the first place? - Absoluteley.
I don't think there's any point discussing this any more with the blind supporters of MFX. If you can't or won't see the plain evidence that they dropped the ball on this then it's futile. The 'no-one else gets it right, so why should they' argument isn't even worthy of a response, tbh.
won't handle them.