Is the Apache gunner facing the rear? Uhh no. Also, not every military aircraft with a back seat (unless a trainer) has controls in the back seat. Rear facing is ok for targeting computers for weapons, but not a great position to be piloting. Take the F-14 Tomcat. The RIO does not have flight controls. Also, from most official schematics , cutaways, databanks, the craft is listed as having 1x pilot and 1x gunner. Not pilot and copilot. To me it just comes down to lazy fans and lazy comic/novel writers. Their lame thinking... Luke is a pilot and he wears an orange suit. So if this other guy is dressed like Luke, then that guy must be a pilot too. Whatever...
I agree the idea is that Rogue Group (not squadron) was an homage to Rogue One. My point is that the movies never said Rogue Squadron but people jump to that assumption.
So Rogue Squadron was coined by Timothy Zahn. Which was supposed to be Rogue Group renamed after the films. But Rogue Squadron was........you know what, its inconsistent EU stuff that's confusing so I'll just post what's on Wookieepedia
Rogue Squadron's origins date back to
Irvin Kershner's
1980 film
Star Wars: Episode V The Empire Strikes Back, wherein Luke Skywalker commands a team of snowspeeder pilots during the Battle of Hoth that he calls "Rogue Group."
[47] The movie's novelization also uses the designation "Rogue Group,"
[184] but its
radio drama identifies the group as "Rogue Flight,"
[47] a name that would be echoed in
1984's
A Guide to the Star Wars Universe.
[185] Galaxy Guide 3: The Empire Strikes Back, published in
1989, again uses "Rogue Group," and describes them as a squadron of starfighter pilots who are pressed into service flying snowspeeders in times of need.
[186] 1990's
The Rebel Alliance Sourcebook refers to all of the starfighter units assigned to Hoth's Echo Base as "rogue squadrons,"
[187] and
Galaxy Guide 5: Return of the Jedi, published in the same year, again uses the term "Rogue Group" to refer to Skywalker's squadron.
[188]
Ralph McQuarrie's concept art of Rogue Group at the Battle of Hoth
It was author
Timothy Zahn who coined the term "Rogue Squadron" and established the Rogues as an elite fighting force of the New Republic, active five years after the events of
Star Wars: Episode VI Return of the Jedi, while writing his
1991 novel
Heir to the Empire.
[189] The
Second Edition of
Galaxy Guide 3, published in
1996, went on to state that "Rogue Group" fell under the command of Wedge Antilles following the Battle of Hoth, and that it was remodeled and renamed "Rogue Squadron" prior to
Return of the Jedi's Battle of Endor.
[190] More recently,
2012's
The Essential Guide to Warfare has established a definitive timeline regarding the squadron's nomenclature: "Rogue Flight" was born just after
Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope's Battle of Yavin, and while Skywalker and Antilles were later stationed on Hoth, they were considering expanding the flight into a full-fledged squadron. Hoth's Echo Base was attacked, however, and "Rogue Group" was an ersatz snowspeeder unit created from Rogue Flight, Green Squadron, and Blue Squadron, and tasked with defending Echo Base.
[6] The Rogues then became a full twelve-person squadron following the battle.
[50] Nevertheless, various sources refer to the pre-Hoth Rogues as either Rogue Group
[22] or Rogue Squadron.
[28][34]
A different origin story for the Rogues is given in
Brian Wood's
2013–
2014 comic series Star Wars. The series'
tenth issue sees Skywalker and Antilles flying in the Rebel Alliance's black ops
Stealth Squadron, which Antilles suggests renaming Rogue Squadron.
[191] Two issues later, he formally requests that Stealth Squadron be dissolved so that he may form Rogue Squadron, a proper Alliance squadron that fights out in the open. His request is approved.
[192] This runs contrary to the Rogue Squadron origin story given in
Galaxy Guide 3: The Empire Strikes Back, Second Edition
[22]and reiterated in such sources as
The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia[2] and
The Essential Guide to Warfare.
[6] The two conflicting stories have not been reconciled.
But as far as the gunners bring pilots. It makes sense when you consider that they probably didn't have enough T-47s to go around. And those pilots would be excellent gunners being really adept at leading targets. And when it was time to load the up T-47s both guys could hop out and jump in their fighters.