Indiana Jones 5 officially announced

I agree. On another movie...how could there be little blue people called Smurfs? Living in mushrooms? Give me a break. Only one woman responsible for procreation and she's not the queen? Totally fake.

TazMan2000
Dude first of all smurfs lived in mushrooms because they were all fungi’s (play on words),second Smurfette was created by Gargamel so she had nothing to do with procreation as the smurfs already existed before her arrival.In this day and age everyone knows the smurfs procreated themselves as men can become pregnant.Not fake! J/K
 
Last edited:
l0b01zp4kd2a1.png
 
Dude first of all smurfs lived in mushrooms because they were all fungi’s (play on words),second Smurfette was created by Gargamel so she had nothing to do with procreation as the smurfs already existed before her arrival.In this day and age everyone knows the smurfs procreated themselves as men can become pregnant.Not fake!

I'm not sure if I should thank you for correcting me, or feel sorry for you, that you know this. LOL
I used to have young children, so I probably know too much about Bob the Builder, Teletubbies, Barney the Dinosaur that I care to admit.

Actually, I was just trying to lighten the mood. I thought the movie realism discussion was getting a bit serious. I really don't give a rat's butt about the Smurfs. Not my genre, but I don't condemn anyone for having an interest in the original Blue Man Group.

I wish I could still look at the world through the eyes of a child (figuratively), since I'm certain I would enjoy movies a bit more. I used to be an explosives expert in the military, so my enjoyment of action films diminished significantly, after my military training, when I saw stuff blow up on screen. I would cringe, when I saw something I knew was "Hollywoodized" much like a scientist would, watching Star Trek in the 60s. I have tried to teach myself to not have high expectations of movies and that seems to have improved my outlook.

TazMan2000
 
I'm not sure if I should thank you for correcting me, or feel sorry for you, that you know this. LOL
I used to have young children, so I probably know too much about Bob the Builder, Teletubbies, Barney the Dinosaur that I care to admit.

Actually, I was just trying to lighten the mood. I thought the movie realism discussion was getting a bit serious. I really don't give a rat's butt about the Smurfs. Not my genre, but I don't condemn anyone for having an interest in the original Blue Man Group.

I wish I could still look at the world through the eyes of a child (figuratively), since I'm certain I would enjoy movies a bit more. I used to be an explosives expert in the military, so my enjoyment of action films diminished significantly, after my military training, when I saw stuff blow up on screen. I would cringe, when I saw something I knew was "Hollywoodized" much like a scientist would, watching Star Trek in the 60s. I have tried to teach myself to not have high expectations of movies and that seems to have improved my outlook.

TazMan2000
You are all good dude,it was my warped way of trying to joke. I sometimes tend to view the circus(life) thru the eyes of the clown.Thanks for your service.
 
This would probably be better than The Adventures of Helena the Goddaughter of Indy.

View attachment 1679082


Add in h"His Trademark" Baseball hat. A set of Double 45s. A whip. Yes, a whip, and his own style of side bag and we got a winner.

Like Indy's inspiration in Last Crusade. Short Round adopted some of Indy's tools and did some changes of his own.

And, yes. Have guns and use them.

When the hell did Indy stop using a gun??? Anyone remember Raiders, Last Crusade, the beginning of Temple of Doom.
 
This would probably be better than The Adventures of Helena the Goddaughter of Indy.

View attachment 1679082

I know this falls within "let people enjoy things" territory, even if those things are just imaginary wishful thinking, but frankly way to diminish the guy's accomplishments by suggesting he could follow up an Oscar win with a role on a B-tier streaming show about a secondary character he played 40 years ago that's completely inconsequential to the main series it originally was part of.

Neither him nor the Indiana Jones movies need any of that.
 
I know this falls within "let people enjoy things" territory, even if those things are just imaginary wishful thinking, but frankly way to diminish the guy's accomplishments by suggesting he could follow up an Oscar win with a role on a B-tier streaming show about a secondary character he played 40 years ago that's completely inconsequential to the main series it originally was part of.

Neither him nor the Indiana Jones movies need any of that.

Yeah, he probably wouldn’t do a streaming series, right now. ;)

 
Last edited:
Back
Top