pennausamike
Sr Member
Ok, since I was the first one to ask about this master in this thread I figured I would chime in now.
I do like the ship overall, and the size is great- I love a model that I can add lights and other things into.
I do however have serious questions when it comes to the quality and finish of the raw kit though.
![]()
I'm looking forward to following your progress!!
I think that was a thorough and useful presentation of issues with the master.
I would agree most with the rough areas you showed as needing smoothed out, tho' I assumed that that would come before molding.
I also viewed some of the caulking as useful in removing such a large and multi-faceted shape from a mold, to allow for multiple castings; tho' Ron would be better qualified to speak to that.
None of the problems you presented are a deal-breaker for me, especially not the symmetry issues you showed in the green horizontal and vertical lines above.
The gaps at the windscreen are fit items I would attend to at joining the two halves.
My eye just isn't tuned to that level of perfection.
I would admit that I tend to build three-footers in my modeling, so my opinion is just that, my OPINION.
My primary interest in this ship is to have a kit to build flaws and all.
My worst scenario is a progress thread that lasts 2 years and results in a "perfect" $600 ship with a billion parts that I'll never have the time or money to build.
Perhaps the most useful information, from those actually serious about purchase of a three-foot Firefly replica, is what flaws or features would make you choose to NOT make a purchase.
Aegis159 presented an excellent analysis of pretty nearly all the flaws, but which ones would you be willing to deal with on clean-up and assembly; and which flaws would make the kit too much trouble to build or too unsatisfactory upon completion?