TazMan2000
Master Member
...but the does look 'armless
J
He must have ejected previously from another A-Wing.
TazMan2000
...but the does look 'armless
J
Hey just thought I'd re-ignite that old A-Wing scale conversation
Over on Facebook, a good mate of mine, John Simmons is building a Nice-N Studio Scale model of the ship....all parts have been researched & sourced including the WW1 pilot that ILM used.....He does look a bit uncomfortable in the ship
...but the does look 'armless
J
...but the does look 'armless
J
Agree with all these points - the U-Wing in 1:72 would be amazing. I vaguely remember reading that the TIE Striker was much more prominent in an earlier cut of Rogue One, and given the long lead times on producing models, I wouldn't be surprised if that's what's responsible for the seeming mis-match in which model was picked for the 1:72 treatment.
A TIE Reaper in 1:72 would be huge - it's actually larger than the Millennium Falcon!
View attachment 986188
A couple IMHOs:
- If we're going to start calling the TIE Strike the "flying suppository," then the TIE bomber must also be dubbed the "double suppository." I mean, fair is fair.I, for one, like the Striker. I felt it fit the OT aesthetic very well. And I'm not sure what movie you guys saw, but the Striker was in the movie about as much as the standard TIE. I'd also like a U-Wing in 1/72, but that doesn't mean Bandai screwed up by offering the Striker in 1/72.
- I also can't help but like the size of ILM/Simmons A-Wing pilot. I like the idea of the A-Wing as a souped up soapbox racer. I bumped up the scale of the pilot on my Bandai build and it looks right (even if it's wrong).
I always thought the bomber was the double Coke can or in ILM's 70s style: the double beer can.
I hope that's March 11 and not November 2.
Yes, forgive me I just got up.I think you meant February.
TazMan2000