You have never seen the Blade Runner blaster before - PHOTOS RESTORED

<div class='quotetop'>(Noeland @ Aug 29 2006, 02:07 PM) [snapback]1309204[/snapback]</div>
Guys, I was actually excited to wake up and come back to this thread. hahahaha. Does that make me sick . [/b]
Not at all.

It just means that one the things we all love just got a lot more interesting. :D

Jim
 
<div class='quotetop'>(racprops @ Aug 29 2006, 02:03 PM) [snapback]1309203[/snapback]</div>
Well as this gun has CLEAR numbers and all three importing stamps, this seems to be the real Styer, and I have had almost no luck getting good castings with clear lettering.

Rich
[/b]
Actually, a lost wax investment-cast foundry casting would be virtually identical. After all, they spared no expense...ahem...wrong film...but it'll do.

Phil
 
Boy, I think I'll skip reading RPF for a few days more often. Amazing news, and wonderful photos. Thanks for sharing, and special thanks to the owner for sharing their prop for display & photographs. I guess this is why I've been dragging my feet on getting a PKD. :D
 
I would suggest that anyone who gets to examine this gun closely look for signs that the Steyr receiver is cast. It's very, very likely.

Phil
 
It was also mentioned somewhere in the thread that the grips may have been intended to glow.

Phil- I remeber a while ago that you had gotten word that the handle may have had wires coming out of the botttom but couldn't say why. Was this the function you were implying?

I want to see a glowing PKD grip now.

Nick
 
<div class='quotetop'>(philippes @ Aug 29 2006, 12:00 PM) [snapback]1309235[/snapback]</div>
I would suggest that anyone who gets to examine this gun closely look for signs that the Steyr receiver is cast. It's very, very likely.

Phil
[/b]

Can someone post some dimensions for a receiver? One clear sign of a casting is if the dimensions are off.

Phil are you saying it's a certainty that the castings were in steel?? That seems like a remarkable amount of trouble to go through for a prop, it's much easier to cast brass/bronze/aluminum.
 
<div class='quotetop'>(nick daring @ Aug 29 2006, 03:02 PM) [snapback]1309237[/snapback]</div>
It was also mentioned somewhere in the thread that the grips may have been intended to glow.

Phil- I remeber a while ago that you had gotten word that the handle may have had wires coming out of the botttom but couldn't say why. Was this the function you were implying?

I want to see a glowing PKD grip now.

Nick
[/b]
Yes. I was told some time back there were electronics in the grips. But I was also told that they existed to light an LED in the buttpate that never worked. Maybe they meant the grips. Over time, stories get distorted.

Phil


<div class='quotetop'>(Serafino @ Aug 29 2006, 03:04 PM) [snapback]1309239[/snapback]</div>
Phil are you saying it's a certainty that the castings were in steel?? That seems like a remarkable amount of trouble to go through for a prop, it's much easier to cast brass/bronze/aluminum.
[/b]
Nothing is certain. I'm simply relaying what I'm being told. There's a lot of chatter on the Blade Runner channel right now.

Phil
 
<div class='quotetop'>(phase pistol @ Aug 29 2006, 02:39 PM) [snapback]1309224[/snapback]</div>
OK folks I'm taking my pictures offline for a little while... I just got an email from Mac.com that says "you've exceeded 75% of your .Mac data transfer quota for the current period. At the current rate you may exceed your quota ... If this happens, access to your site(s) will be turned off"...

Since I need to keep using my .mac stuff, I don't want that to happen.

If everybody has already got the pix they need, then cool. If somebody with really fat pipes wants to host my pics, please PM or EM me.

Thanks,


- Karl
[/b]

Arrgg, I didn't copy them to my desktop yet. Hehehe I wondered why the pics you've been posting in your last few posts have red "X's" in them......
 
It's gonna be an interesting few weeks in Blade Ruinner geekdom. I'm curious to see what other things will start surfacing as well.

Nick
 
<div class='quotetop'>(philippes @ Aug 29 2006, 12:11 PM) [snapback]1309244[/snapback]</div>
Nothing is certain. I'm simply relaying what I'm being told. There's a lot of chatter on the Blade Runner channel right now.

Phil
[/b]

Sorry Phil, let me rephrase: Did your source specify foundry-cast in steel? Or is the metal not specified? Thanks.
 
<div class='quotetop'>(Serafino @ Aug 29 2006, 03:50 PM) [snapback]1309280[/snapback]</div>
Sorry Phil, let me rephrase: Did your source specify foundry-cast in steel? Or is the metal not specified? Thanks.
[/b]
My contact didn't even know what guns were used to make his; let alone be familiar with the material out of which his receiver is constructed.

You guys must realize that our interest in this prop isn't quite natural.

I've been told from reliable sources that the gun in this thread features a cast receiver.

Many old-time collectors don't know much about the details of their props--simply that they love them, think they're cool, know they screen-match, and/or are remnants of classic cinema.

There's been a rumor floating around for years that the Blade Runner gun cost $10,000 to produce. This is in 1981 dollars. If at least three heroes were made, that figure makes a lot more sense now.

'Why make one when you can make three and charge three times as much.'

Phil

The assumption is that receivers were cast in steel. Assuming this is true, that probably caused some consternation, as Ridley Scott would have been asking people to do things that weren't really allowed.

Phil
 
<div class='quotetop'>(nick daring @ Aug 29 2006, 12:49 PM) [snapback]1309279[/snapback]</div>
It's gonna be an interesting few weeks in Blade Ruinner geekdom. I'm curious to see what other things will start surfacing as well.

Nick
[/b]


Look at the other pictures at the beginning of this thread. The design mysteries of the officer badge have come to light, this is huge for those of us who love/collect badges.

Look at the officer hat and face piece, the belt, the patches all of which are clear as day now.

Most importantly for me is the ID, which has been cloaked in mystery for years by professional collectors and it is very different than we had thought or have been led to believe.

I think we have enough right here to last us quite some time... :)

I would like to see individual threads started on some of these very topics so we can have a real lively discussion about these items.

It is a great time to be a Blade Runner fan....
-Bryan
 
<div class='quotetop'>(phase pistol @ Aug 29 2006, 04:34 PM) [snapback]1309310[/snapback]</div>
Pics will be back as soon as I get them hosted... Wackychimp is probably best I suppose? How do I go about posting them up there, I've never done it.

- k
[/b]

Depending on the file size, Pilot's pic hosting may be a better choice.

http://www.therpf.com/index.php?showtopic=115601

<div class='quotetop'></div>
Several years ago now, Wackychimp and I discussed the whole image hosting subject, and decided that more was better. He and I have never been in competition for anyone's "business," nor will we ever be. I am not, and will never be, trying to steer anyone away from his services if you're happy with using them.

Here's what I have to offer:
-Lots of storage space - I still host pictures dating back to 2003 when I first got the server up and running.
-Liberal image size - up to 2MB (JPEG, GIF, BMP, PNG) through the upload page, and I will even host larger files/additional file types if you get in touch with me.
-Images may be hosted for any purpose or any bulletin board, not just the RPF.
-A free bouquet of flowers for every 100 images uploaded.

OK, I'm lying about that last one.

If you are so inclined, feel free to point your browser at:
http://www.hooverae.com/upload/uploader.php[/b]
 
Did Karl, Rich, anyone operate the bolt?? Did it have a bolt face/pin, did the side of the bolt have an extractor? If the receiver was cast, but was not made from steel that was intended to sustain breech pressures, was not threaded for a barrel of the same dimensions as the breech and/or was not fully machined to fit the trigger group no BATFE (back then, ATF) paperwork or permits would be needed. (I am a BATFE licensee and gun builder, over 17 years)

Certainly for spare guns, they could have cast the receiver and bolt as a single unit and even a closeup might not have revealed it. Even if the bolt and receiver were cast separately, operating the bolt would have helped determine if it was an orig. as bolt/receiver tolerances are tight, esp. on a rifle. Those of you who have tried a Steyr rifle bolt and also an RAC metal replica bolt will see (feel) what I mean.

Also, did the safety selector slide (on the Steyr)? Another clue since even a closeup shot wouldn't reveal if it was a fixed item or articulating.

If someone has an oblique angle, well lit photo of the markings on the receiver, I have access to a master gun restorer who works for the Smithsonian Institute in DC and he is a world class expert at firearms markings. I would bet the farm on his analysis of whether or not the markings on this gun are factory original or high grade reproductions. This MIGHT add a little clarification.

I wonder if the creators of Blade Runner knew how long the fascination with so many aspects of the film, esp. props, would endure, along with the incredible intense scrutiny of details.
 
<div class='quotetop'>(nick daring @ Aug 29 2006, 12:02 PM) [snapback]1309237[/snapback]</div>
It was also mentioned somewhere in the thread that the grips may have been intended to glow.


[/b]

This gun was really tricked out, all it needed was curbfeelers :lol This is one of the best threads in a long time. :thumbsup
I do have two nagging questions:

So if three heros were made, where are the other two ?

If the owner of this hero is letting it be displayed with the upcoming release of the new directors cut, does this mean a possible sale/or auction of the gun ?
 
Look at the back green led... then look at the common screw. Its in a different position than in the top photo... someone has been working on it....
 
<div class='quotetop'>(Darth Detroit @ Aug 29 2006, 01:52 PM) [snapback]1309334[/snapback]</div>
Look at the back green led... then look at the common screw. Its in a different position than in the top photo... someone has been working on it....
[/b]

Or it is a different hero as the wires in the screen cap are under the cover whereas the wires in this hero are on the outside. So some of the features may be a little different...

-Bryan
 
Back
Top