You have never seen the Blade Runner blaster before - PHOTOS RESTORED

Carl,

I believe Testors Model Masters has/had a Metalizer paint out that very closely matches the steel look -- I think I painted a PKD model this color -- sold it off quite some time ago -- but it was a very nice steel look -- especially when it was buffed up. If Richard uses this paint (or a close match) then I think the finish will closely match the bare steel look of the original filming prop -- or at least the one we now have pictures of.
 
did some rework on the butt of the gun added a bit of thickness ,then contoured the angles to the radius of the amber grips. took PHArhivists advice and droped the grips in Future wax, man it really glossed the piece out.
Im very happy with my Bladerunner blaster.Rich you do very nice work.
 
The Alclad steel paint that MrPredicta used on his repaint looks fabulous. Would love it if Richie used this paint on his revised version.
 
REMOVED[img]

This picture in particular really breaks my heart.

If possible, if there were to be an offer made to the current owner for a restoration of this prop, what type of products and techniques would or could be used to remove the rust and make her pretty again?

It doesn't look beyond saving.

I guess the real question is, if you were to restore this, would you reblue the metal parts?

Now, moving on to this image:

[img]REMOVED[img]

I think it's been accepted for years that the bulldog was chromed or stainless, but this does not look like either to me.

So, are we now being shown that the bulldog was in fact blued, but weathered to the point of being "steel"? and Ridley's camera read it as chromed? Or just really "shiny"? :lol
 
I know it shocked me too, it shows how bright lighting can be making a film, and why they dull things down to cut reflections.


Rich
 
I have an old Merwin Hulbert pistol that was originally nickle plated, but most of it has worn off. Here's what it looks like now (it's got a date of 1873 on the side, so it's seen some years of wear and tear). I was thinking, when you said that it was thought to be chromed or stainless, that maybe it was nickle plated and has worn off, but the gun doesn't seem old enough to have lost all the plating and look like that. Just an idea...

130314183.jpg
 
I cant belive the owner gave permission to take that close pictures?
I would never do that with my props.
 
Dr Mcoy- yes Im familiar with that testors paint. Havent tried it but I may give it go. thanks.
Spinner- That second picture of the Hero just leads me to believe that the reciever was more blue than steel even after it was steel wooled. Time and oxidation took care of the rest.

Rich- If your metal guy can hue the metal to any color that would be fabulous. I would love it if he could get a blueish black color on the metal parts. :) Heres hoping.

Carl
 
Well we have come to feel it was striped of blueing and was just raw steel durning the movie, so that is the look we are going for.

Rich
 
<div class='quotetop'></div>
I cant belive the owner gave permission to take that close pictures?
I would never do that with my props. [/b]

If you don't mind me asking, why is that?

<div class='quotetop'></div>
that maybe it was nickle plated and has worn off, but the gun doesn't seem old enough to have lost all the plating and look like that.[/b]

When I posted "chromed" I meant :) nickel plated :) what you said.

I have a set of old "The American" pistols that have a very similiar finish to the hulbert pistol. I bought these as props, they still function great and fire blanks no problem. I got em for $20. :) I have no real interest in restoring the finish on these.

amer1.jpg


My old webley on the other hand . . .

That I will have done by a professional. I was just curious what type of techniques might a professional use to restore something like this.
 
It also makes me sad to see this important piece of flim history in such a state of disrepair.I'd like to see it restored to it's former gloryIt must pain everyone who see this prop that hasbeen an object of such devotion and study on a subject that I know has given me a love of sorts if you will forwhat I think is one of the most beloved icons of motion picture props.But thats just my 2 cents Thanks
 
<div class='quotetop'></div>
It also makes me sad to see this important piece of flim history in such a state of disrepair.[/b]

As actual filming props go, I'd say this thing is in damn good shape. In fact I think its lucky that this even exists at all.
 
Hey I'm just glad that the owner was so great to share so much with us all. He must have been very open to all the photo's being taken and I think that is great. Very unselfish of him and I personally wish to thank you for all the photos and the owner for being such a great sport about it.

Thank you again.

Tek
 
<div class='quotetop'>(Noeland @ Sep 4 2006, 09:36 PM) [snapback]1312891[/snapback]</div>
<div class='quotetop'>
I cant belive the owner gave permission to take that close pictures?
I would never do that with my props. [/b]

If you don't mind me asking, why is that?

[/b][/quote]

Yeah I don't quite get that either... (?)


<div class='quotetop'>(mr.predicta @ Sep 4 2006, 07:54 AM) [snapback]1312628[/snapback]</div>
did some rework on the butt of the gun added a bit of thickness ,then contoured the angles to the radius of the amber grips. took PHArhivists advice and droped the grips in Future wax, man it really glossed the piece out.
[/b]


Happy to be able to help. :)
 
<div class='quotetop'>(Coinprop @ Sep 4 2006, 04:05 PM) [snapback]1312875[/snapback]</div>
I cant belive the owner gave permission to take that close pictures?
I would never do that with my props.
[/b]

Why wouldn't he? If I had the gun, I'd let people take pictures.

FB
 
Possibly for the same reasons that the photos of the wallet set are restricted?
To keep the value of the original high, and stop super-accurate replicas being made?
 
Sorry for going off topic. I'll remove the post if you want:


You can have the most accurate prop out there, but the original will still retain it's value.

A screen used Vader helmet will still bring a hefty price. The original Obiwan saber (if it still existed) would still be worth a lot of money.

Keeping things hidden are to keep the value of the replicas high, not the original prop..

FB
 
Unfortunately, until one has owned original screen-used props, it's very hard to understand the feelings of those who have extremely rare and valuable items in their collections.

Although I don't agree with the fundamental premise and inherent elitism that exists in regards to this dynamic, I nonetheless understand it. I also feel the protectiveness, and deal with these feelings on a regular basis when copies of original props I own are released by people who have no stake or investment in them except to further their own personal glory while profiting from something I pride myself in owning.

Here's the dilemma: It's hard enough these days to verify the authenticity of a piece, but once details about an original are released, and bootleggers start making evermore accurate replicas, it makes it even more difficult to prove the genuineness of a prop. What's worse, many fakes eventually find their way into private collections, pawned off as originals, costing unwary victims thousands—and in some cases tens of thousands—of dollars.

I've heard from several owners of original Blade Runner props over the past week, and they're livid that this information has been released. In at least one case, the owner has decided to part with something he's owned for over 20 years because the mystique of the piece has been lost. Another is very upset because "tells" only known to him have now been exposed and will be added to reproductions. The paper prop dilemma is even worse, and those who own original Blade Runner badges, IDs, etc. are thoroughly frustrated.

Until one's spent over $10k on a prop, and then watched it reproduced, will never understand the concern.

All of this said, it's about time owners of original props began to realize that one of the reasons prices of certain pieces has remained artificially high is due to this "code of silence." With the advent of the Internet, and the unprecedented mass and instant sharing of information on a global scale, the fundamentals of data exclusivity have changed. Just ask the RIAA and MPAA.

It's about time owners of original props came to understand that if something they own is not being replicated, it probably isn't worth much in the first place. And while seeing information about such pieces gratuitously shared with everyone in the world is frustrating, it should come as a major consolation that people care about such pieces as much as they do in the first place.

Similar to real estate, the secret to maintaining the value of original props is still: Provenance, provenance, provenance.

Phil
 
Back
Top