Just got back from seeing the new Spider Man movie. As a fan of the Sam Raimi trilogy, I found my self wishing that this Parker would be magically replaced with Tobey Maguire. Haters are gonna hate, but I did not care for Andrew Garfield. I couldn't stand his mannerisms half the time, I kept wanting to hear Maguire's voice when he was suited up. Also, I grew up with Parker's love interest being MaryJane Watson, it may be a minor gripe to complain about the girlfriend, the character herself was fine and she didn't bug me, the premise was just alien to me.
A lot of the elements where alien to me, the absence of Norman Osborn's son, the absence of Norman Osborn all together. I also thought that Doctor Connors was Parker's Collage professor, not an employe of OsCorp. This is all coming from the knowledge I have from the old nineties cartoon, and the tidbits I've picked up on some of Linkara's Atop the Fourth Wall comic book reviews. I greatly prefer the first two of Sam Raimi's films, the third one was simply not handled well, and the cluster attack of enemies played to it's disadvantage. With that said, The Amazing Spiderman, in my opinion, is better than the third at least.
It was really good, I liked the story, the casting of most of the characters, and the pacing was great I thought. But I just had a hard time liking it as a whole.