Picard102
Sr Member
Sorry, but that dog won't hunt
No they got it right.
139 posts (15% of the thread) whining about a show they've never watched is well within "running down a hallway screaming your head off".
Sorry, but that dog won't hunt
The one thing that I noticed lately, is a very subtle shift in how I view all of this, and how everyone reacts to the existence of SNW, now that Season One is in the can.
- I am not a fan of the franchise, just a viewer that likes the content.
- I enjoy this series as much as the first one when it aired years ago. To the point I watch each episode of SNW a couple of times, in between reading all the posts on this site (and others). I may eventually find my viewing count matches between TOS and SNW, that is a possibility.
- Picard I didnt 'get', but thats ok, you watch a show, mull it over, move on.
I know the second season of SNW is in the works, and I wish all of the people working on the project, all the best and much success.
After all, we all have a choice in what we want to read, watch, listen to, create, etc - for Strange New Worlds, its getting attention, which in itself, is something I expected just as much as when Gene shook things up in a previous generation.
And yes, its just a TV show, and one I enjoy watching
View attachment 1586870
I would do things a little differently. Try a few different writing styles from different decades.This is a perfectly polite and rational post. Congratulations on being civilized, and keep on liking what you like.
See, people? It's not so hard.
That being said, the NuChapel screenshot is deeply stupid, and symptomatic of the sort of lowbrow, snarky, millennial-speak that the franchise now employs. Ostensibly to "try and appeal to a younger audience", but I suspect it's really because they're just that dumb, and can only write on a CW level. This style of writing arguably all started with Joss Whedon and BUFFY, which was great in its time, but the difference is that everyone else who has come after and tried to rip off that style just appears derivative and dumb.
Remember, Alex Kurtzman co-wrote the script which revealed that McCoy's nickname is the result of his ex-wife taking everything but his "bones" in the divorce, rather than the correct answer (which TOS never explained, because it respected the intelligence of the audience), which is that it's a riff on "sawbones" (the old slang term for a surgeon).
I'm issuing a creative-writing challenge to the participants of this thread: Take a classic scene from TOS, TNG, etc. and rewrite it in the style of NuTREK. How would the characters act and speak, if written in that style?
On the flipside, take a scene from SNW, and rewrite it in the style of TOS, TNG, etc. How would the characters act and speak, if written in that style?
It's almost like he can't hear himselfIncorrect. People are free to like what they like, just as I'm free to ask "How?" And "Why?"
What I can't handle is STAR TREK being denigrated and turned into brain-dead pap by frauds and hacks who are more than happy to plagiarize the works of better people, and use identity politics as a shield against criticism. The "useful idiots"(for lack of a better term) who gleefully support this cultural vandalism are inconsequential.
Still, thanks for playing. Ignored.
i like the 2nd idea; not so much the 1st (due to not wanting brain cells to die)This is a perfectly polite and rational post. Congratulations on being civilized, and keep on liking what you like.
See, people? It's not so hard.
That being said, the NuChapel screenshot is deeply stupid, and symptomatic of the sort of lowbrow, snarky, millennial-speak that the franchise now employs. Ostensibly to "try and appeal to a younger audience", but I suspect it's really because they're just that dumb, and can only write on a CW level. This style of writing arguably all started with Joss Whedon and BUFFY, which was great in its time, but the difference is that everyone else who has come after and tried to rip off that style just appears derivative and dumb.
Remember, Alex Kurtzman co-wrote the script which revealed that McCoy's nickname is the result of his ex-wife taking everything but his "bones" in the divorce, rather than the correct answer (which TOS never explained, because it respected the intelligence of the audience), which is that it's a riff on "sawbones" (the old slang term for a surgeon).
I'm issuing a creative-writing challenge to the participants of this thread: Take a classic scene from TOS, TNG, etc. and rewrite it in the style of NuTREK. How would the characters act and speak, if written in that style?
On the flipside, take a scene from SNW, and rewrite it in the style of TOS, TNG, etc. How would the characters act and speak, if written in that style?
That is art, right there. Just needs a reference to hoopleheads.“Specter of the Gun” meets “Deadwood”:
Deadwood version:
KIRK
We’re ***king trapped. The c***suckers got their way. We’ve got to plant our c***sucking feet square in the breach and meet their woeful ****ing intent with our own.
CALAMITY SCOTT
I can reconcile with that state of ****ing affairs, and no lie. I’ll meet them straight and introduce my leaden resolve right betwixt their ****ing eyes.
KIRK
They’re a mite better skilled in the lethal ****ing arts than we. I don’t reckon but we’re for Wu’s pig pen.
MCCOY
Then we’ll have to match those c***suckers with our own artful calculations, and with ****ing dispatch!
SPOCK
That may not be ****ing necessary.
KIRK
Spock, what dawns in that ****ing brainpan o’ yourn?
SPOCK
A ****ing fact, Captain. Physical laws of nature and Him what created ‘em cannot be ****ing ignored. What we is, we is, but without ‘em, we ****ing ain’t.
MCCOY
What’re you ****in’ fixin’ to lay before us, you Vulcan c***sucker?
SPOCK
I’m holding up to your incredulous ****ing vision that what which is, just cain’t be, and no ****ing lie. Your knockout smoke should’ve kicked him in the haid like a mule on Sunday and ended his steely fixation on ****ing wakefulness.
KIRK
And it woulda, but for being in this ****ing side of Hell itself.
SPOCK
Agreed. Doc McCoy, what do you ****ing reckon put Chekov over yonder in Wu’s ****ing pig pen?
MCCOY
He were ****ing ventilated, good and proper.
SPOCK
**** no. T’was the jellied mass twixt his ears done made him porcine ****ing fodder.
Damn! I knew I was missing something.That is art, right there. Just needs a reference to hoopleheads.
since watching TOS since it was originally broadcast (and then syndication), i knew something was missing. hoopleheads. nailed it.That is art, right there. Just needs a reference to hoopleheads.
Fixed. Let it never be said of me that I don’t listen to the hoopleheads what pays my ****ing freight, and no mistake.That is art, right there. Just needs a reference to hoopleheads.
No, but a lot of us are asking WHY?!?! and that question goes entirely unanswered. "Because!" isn't an answer. How can you have a discussion if it remains at such an absurdly shallow, simplistic level?I'm not the person who spent this entire thread flat out insulting anyone who likes this show. And when someone holds up a mirror to the behaviour *they* get called negative and trouble causers and are blocked.
Came here for a nice discussion about the show we enjoy but clearly that's against the narrative here.
And yes, we all noticed where you completely FAILED to produce a single post to support your contention.Oh my goodness. We're clearly reading different threads here.
People who like and enjoy this show have several times literally been called idiots in this thread and had it stated that the show is trash. Yet when we say "that's your opinion, it's not fact" we get angry reacted and blocked. I mean, it literally the definition of not being able to take what you hand out. And incredibly childish.
I'll leave you all to your echo chamber as it's clearly what you want. Hate away.
Why should we have to? When we as people enjoy a thing, and want to communally enjoy it with others... but there are people going "THIS IS TERRIBLE THAT'S A FACT AND YOU HAVE TO PROVE TO US WHY IT ISN'T" ...it's just incredibly tiring. Sometimes all you want to do is talk about a thing you enjoy. Not need to prove it's worth to people who think their opinion is actual fact.And yes, we all noticed where you completely FAILED to produce a single post to support your contention.
Shuck and jive, shuck and jive, it seems that's all you people can do.
Because this is how intelligent discussions work. We detail exactly WHY we have problems with these shows and everyone on your side is running around like a 4-year old going "we like it!" This is where one side is so ridiculously shallow, because they don't have any REASONS for anything. It's just a bald emotional reaction based on nothing but fee-fees. There's never been any kind of rational, intellectual, critical evaluation of the subject matter, it's all just... Mikey will eat it, he'll eat anything!Why should we have to? When we as people enjoy a thing, and want to communally enjoy it with others... but there are people going "THIS IS TERRIBLE THAT'S A FACT AND YOU HAVE TO PROVE TO US WHY IT ISN'T" ...it's just incredibly tiring. Sometimes all you want to do is talk about a thing you enjoy. Not need to prove it's worth to people who think their opinion is actual fact.
Had there been a little bit more of "well in my opinion I find this show lacking but I understand you may like it" then there'd be more of the discussion you seem to think should be happening. But there hasn't been one bit of that. Simply "it's terrible and you can't argue against that!"
Because this is how intelligent discussions work. We detail exactly WHY we have problems with these shows and everyone on your side is running around like a 4-year old going "we like it!" This is where one side is so ridiculously shallow, because they don't have any REASONS for anything. It's just a bald emotional reaction based on nothing but fee-fees. There's never been any kind of rational, intellectual, critical evaluation of the subject matter, it's all just... Mikey will eat it, he'll eat anything!
But that's just stupid!
As usual, the Celtic Kegger has chimed in on this topic with deadly accuracy. The reason modern “adult” characters are so often seen behaving like children is because they’re written by children, to appeal to children.Flash-forward to now, and you have snarky (and, let us not forget, bisexual and slutty, because that’s supposedly “empowering”, these days) NuChapel smacking emo-Spock while they’re talking about fee-fees, like they’re teenagers on a CW show, not professional, adult Starfleet officers of the 23rd century.
Maturity, dignity, honesty, intelligence, and so many other key elements have just been drained right out of this franchise. Instead, we have bratty children talking about their feelings and their sex lives while spouting pretentious gibber-jabber. This is in no way STAR TREK.
This is quite a fine summation of the cultural war in general, and an ironic summation of what STAR TREK was vs. what it has become: logic vs. emotion.
Maturity, dignity, honesty, intelligence, and so many other key elements have just been drained right out of this franchise. Instead, we have bratty children talking about their feelings and their sex lives while spouting pretentious gibber-jabber. This is in no way STAR TREK.
OF COURSE everything we write in a discussion is our opinion. It's a given. It doesn't have to be said, by them or by you."...bad writing/attacks on fans/forced politics/forced diversity and “representation” - in your opinion
"entertainment is now garbage" - in your opinion
"beloved franchises are vandalized left, right, and center" - in your opinion
"STAR TREK and the rest have become dumbed-down, state-sponsored propaganda machines" - oh my god, what?![]()