blue and yellow make purple, and I eschew green wall paint.Boy, the path this thread has taken...
I have to declare, once and for all, that Blue is my favorite color. I will also go on the record as declaring that I’ve never cared for Yellow and I find it to be my least favorite of the primary colors.
Now….I’m going to have half the people demand that I explain why Blue is my favorite color (and why Blue sucks) while the other half is going to try to tell me that I have it all wrong about Yellow and why it should be my favorite color.
I, on the other hand, hover high above the fray on my holier than thou cloud of moral certainty, breathing air that is is filled with the pleasing aroma of my own flatulence.
![]()
I still like Strange New Hair. It‘s descriptive, and it (strangely!) ties in with Voyager, which featured Captain Hair, who had more new coifs than Ginger Grant had evening dresses."Brave New World" is more apt.
I still like Strange New Hair. It‘s descriptive, and it (strangely!) ties in with Voyager, which featured Captain Hair, who had more new coifs than Ginger Grant had evening dresses.
View attachment 1587478
View attachment 1587480
It isn't just this thread, it's every thread. This is just the most recent where one side has their fingers in their ears and refuses to actually justify any opinion they have.Boy, the path this thread has taken...
Oh, there were more than two. And there’s at least one more not shown here where she was in a long white dress in her quarters, with her hair cascading down to her waist. I thought she was going to lower it out of a window so a prince could climb up.She packed well for a three-hour tour. Planning ahead gets you ahead. Whereas Katheryn Janeway didn’t know she’d be stranded 70,000 light-years from home, and therefore didn’t bring her full supply of hair products, hence her only having two hairstyles in seven years.
Oh, there were more than two. And there’s at least one more not shown here where she was in a long white dress in her quarters, with her hair cascading down to her waist. I thought she was going to lower it out of a window so a prince could climb up.
View attachment 1587516
But the technique is still being used; since no one here is an "authority", and "no one's life is in danger here", it would stand to reason that those employing it are encountering some type of difficulty. Namely, that they cannot articulate a valid logical response to the queries of those who do not like SNW, and are instead doing the verbal version of "shuckin' and jivin' ".Just so everyone is on the same page here.
Shuckin' and jivin' is a verbal and physical technique some African Americans use to avoid difficulty, to accommodate some authority figure, and in the extreme, to save a life or to save oneself from being beaten physically or psychologically
No one’s life is in jeopardy here nor are you an authority of any kind.
So do I, my friend. We now live in a world of easily hurt emotional children who want the entire world to be a safe space, pandered to by Helicopter Mommy and Lawnmower Daddy.That's very much the case. Society seems to be devolving. In a time when you'd think that people were getting smarter, that's clearly not the case. People can't spell. They can't use language properly. They can't do basic mathematical operations without a calculator. Worse yet, people have lost the capacity for rational thought. They can't reason anything out and come to a logical, evidence-based conclusion. It's all based on childish fee-fees. They don't care what's demonstrably true. They don't care about what's defensibly via evidence. They only care what makes them happy and the second that you back them into a corner and asking how they came to any conclusion, they have no means whatsoever of expressing themselves, they can't do it. They just get mad. They can't see that any of this is a problem which, in and of itself, is a problem.
I weep for the future of humanity.
If this planet ever faces anything like the apocalypse, these people would most likely be the first to go, based on their lack of ability to be rational and mature in the face of any adversity whatsoever.It's not just out of this franchise, it's out of everything. You can't dare say anything that might challenge anyone's preconceptions or possibly make them sad. If you do, the pitchforks and torches come out and they're trying to hunt you down. This is the level of rational discourse today. It's not something that anyone ought to be proud of. In fact, it ought to embarrass people. When someone asks how you justify a particular position and the best they can come up with is "I don't have to tell you!", it's time to pack it in. Go back to pre-school where you were supposed to learn some of these basic life lessons. You're not ready to sit at the adult table with the rest of us.
Kirk NEVER would have sat still for that.Came across this clip from HAVE GUN, WILL TRAVEL, written by Roddenberry, and found myself thinking about what I’ve read regarding the most recent SNW episode, where Pike leaves a child to suffer and the rest of his society to flourish from it, because “the Prime Directive” or whatever.
A point which the real STAR TREK made again and again was that people need to do the right thing for the right reasons, and that the suffering of one means the suffering of all. Leaving intact a system which is built on the suffering of even one life is morally wrong. It may be more “realistic”, or a way of examining issues that are “too big” for one Captain to solve, but it is not providing any kind of morality or code of ethics to aspire to. Because STAR TREK is supposed to be inspirational.
Kirk would have found a way.
Kirk NEVER would have sat still for that.
But since the child can’t be disconnected from the machine without killing him, Pike can do nothing. That sound you hear when Pike is informed of this fact is the writers taking away Pike’s agency. And a hero without agency is no hero at all. You might as well stick him in the beeping wheelchair right now and be done with it.
Kirk NEVER would have sat still for that.
But since the child can’t be disconnected from the machine without killing him, Pike can do nothing. That sound you hear when Pike is informed of this fact is the writers taking away Pike’s agency. And a hero without agency is no hero at all. You might as well stick him in the beeping wheelchair right now and be done with it.
I actually haven’t watched The Batman yet. I’ve heard it’s good, but the three-hour running time keeps shooing me away. I never seem to have three hours to sit and watch a movie that isn’t called The Godfather.…which is close to beating out THE BATMAN, which should be unthinkable, since Batman is one of the greatest and most beloved hero characters in all of fiction,. But he hasn’t been done right in quite some time, so there you go. Of course, the comic book industry is in ruins, and the movies are quickly following it. The movies are making the same mistakes as the comics, but in far less time, with a much bigger audience, and a lot more money at stake.
I actually haven’t watched The Batman yet. I’ve heard it’s good, but the three-hour running time keeps shooing me away. I never seem to have three hours to sit and watch a movie that isn’t called The Godfather.
The Drinker always displays whit, intelligence, and insight that far exceeds the character he portrays.We can only hope that. In the long run, the market will punish the terrible stories and reward the good ones. People fundamentally need heroes, and they’ll only put up with the lack of them for so long.
But once again I’ll let the Analytical Alcoholic do the talking:
That's really the problem. The idiots making Star Trek today, they're like people who found the show without understanding the context of the show at all. They can replicate the look but not get remotely close to the feel. It's like they're aliens who have no clue about humanity, just aping the series for a buck.And it's sort of the opposite with STAR TREK, really. All of the details are there, in a funhouse-mirror sort of way--the aesthetics, the technology, etc. But the characters and the ethos have been stripped out, leaving a shallow surface dressing devoid of the depth and morality of the real thing. An expensive, pretentious, dumb husk.
That's really the problem. The idiots making Star Trek today, they're like people who found the show without understanding the context of the show at all. They can replicate the look but not get remotely close to the feel. It's like they're aliens who have no clue about humanity, just aping the series for a buck.
What the hell is wrong with these people?
One question I have: in WOK: why didn't Khan figure out a way to get an emergency message to Kirk when that happened? I'm sure in his vast intellect he could have rigged up some type of comm to do so. I know the problems with such a thing (technical as well as "the Federation would not take kindly to him"), but it sounds like Khan's pride wouldn't allow him to ask for help.And, in the end, isn’t that just the sort of nihilism that modern entertainment has been completely infused with? “Things suck, you can’t do anything about it, oh well.” Not much of a point to be had, there.
Heroism has also bled completely out of entertainment. We now have shallow, narcissistic villains who are called heroes.
Even in an episode like “A Private Little War”, Kirk did what he felt he had to do in a bad situation to preserve as many lives as possible, and to keep both sides functioning until the war could—hopefully—end. And he wasn’t happy about that solution, but it was the best that could be done.
People who’ve whined over the years about how Kirk always came in with guns blazing and dismantled cultures because he didn’t like how they operated are TOTALLY missing the point. For example, “The Apple” featured a society which was perfectly cared for and content, and Kirk ended that. However, the POINT is that stagnation is unhealthy for a society, and being eternally cared for without agency or growth is no way to live.
There’s a whole cottage industry of books, comics, and articles which focus on how “Kirk was wrong”, and “Kirk screwed up”. So many sequel stories have gone back to show that things got WORSE after the Enterprise left a planet. Of course, people often cite THE WRATH OF KHAN as a canonical example of this, but they miss the point that Kirk gave Khan and his people a fair shot. It was unforeseen circumstances and Khan’s insane desire to blame someone for an act of nature that drove him to vengeance.
In retrospect, this whole going against the grain, “let’s ignore what the show was trying to tell us and be deconstructionist when we get our hands on the IP” mentality foreshadowed where we are now.