You know, with this frame of mind for the film it just might work for me. LOL
Getting back to my original question, is his Lawrence of Arabia thing his own creation or is it Weylands?
Just trying to look for a little subtext, Everything Weyland does is calculated and deliberate, there must be some connection between Davids behavior and Weylands ambitions. Why Weyland choose Lawrence or Peter O Toole if you want to look at it that way is the skinny i guess.
The connection that I can see is the fact that it was Weyland that created David 8 and his previous models, there is a possibility that he liked Lawrence of Arabia, and he decided to have that little piece of himself in David. Sometimes, when someone creates something, be it a piece of art, a novel, a video game and so on, they often add in things that they like. I'm sure you've come up with an idea for something and included a personal easter egg of some sort. Lawrence of Arabia may have been Weyland's easter egg. Remember, Weyland stated that David was the closest to a son he could ever have and David has referred to Weyland as his "parent."
As to if there's any more than that, I can't really say for sure unless Ridley Scott talks about it somewhere.
Do you mean other than the fact that David was doing exactly as Weyland instructed him, and was really the one running the show on LV-233?Just trying to look for a little subtext, Everything Weyland does is calculated and deliberate, there must be some connection between Davids behavior and Weylands ambitions.
Lawrence was a great man who accomplished great things in his eyes, so if it was at Weyland's suggestion, it was probably his desire to see David become, or emulate someone he considered a great man. What any father would want for his son I would imagine.Why Weyland choose Lawrence or Peter O Toole if you want to look at it that way is the skinny i guess.
Of course, how could we not learn from what the critics said back in the day? I take it back, Prometheus is an untrammeled masterpiece.
However the brilliances of this film is tricking a lot people to look past the aweful script/acting and focus on the "big picture questions".
It isn't the ship that is moving, it is everything else around it. It isn't moving in real-time space, so it is a kind of hyperdrive/warp or something.I don't recall that, what was "Futurama"s explanation?
But the increase in speed? Not entirely unbelievable. A common staple of hard scifi is that if we send out ships right now with the purpose of going to another solar system, chances are that before that ship gets to the new solar system they'll be passed by something that was built after them and can significantly outpace them.
So you should have learnt a valuable lesson to ignore critics in influencing you.Indeed, how could I not? Critical response did prevent me from seeing Alien, and almost prevented me from seeing Blade Runner.
Yet you infer we should consider modifying a perfectly valid personal appraisal where it coincides with general critical consensus?In their day both films were heavily criticised for themselves being cliched.
I'm gratified to know that I'm not the only one who thought Prometheus sucked.
I expected a film that looked great and was light on story. I did not expect that I would be required to fan-wank nearly everything in it.
The characters were, generally, as engaging as watching pasta dry. With the exception of Capt. Janek and the ship's crew,
If there were one question that I would like Mr. Scott to answer - yet again, "where does the additional mass come from?"
If I sound angry it's because I am. Good actors got directed into playing standees. See Luther, if you want to see Idris Elba's chops. Michael Fassbinder is a brilliant actor, as is Charlize Theron.
Not sure if explained already, but what was the deal with the glittery green slime on the control panel that David activates?
Yes, that's what happened. I was tricked into liking the movie. Damn you Ridley Scott! <snip> love it or hate it, this ain't just another popcorn muncher.