I have never understood the oft mentioned belief that the flashes were “returned” to Bapty’s, or some other prop rental house. This belief certainly applies to the blaster props, but not to the camera flashes.
According to Roger, the flashes were actually purchased in a lot (a box full, to be exact) at a photography shop and were not rented from a prop store, like Bapty’s.
These things (camera flashes) were a dime a dozen back then. I think we need to revise the thinking that the flashes were rented and returned to some prop rental house. The most likely story is that they were purchased items, owned by the production.
For that reason, the story around this Graflex certainly rings true to me.
I also think that the same “owned by the production” vs “rented by the production” logic applies to other production props that were cobbled together and altered in such a way that they could not be returned to a prop house, such as the macrobinoculars and Ben’s belt hanger saber...which increases the likelihood that they may both be in Europe, somewhere.
According to Roger, the flashes were actually purchased in a lot (a box full, to be exact) at a photography shop and were not rented from a prop store, like Bapty’s.
These things (camera flashes) were a dime a dozen back then. I think we need to revise the thinking that the flashes were rented and returned to some prop rental house. The most likely story is that they were purchased items, owned by the production.
For that reason, the story around this Graflex certainly rings true to me.
I also think that the same “owned by the production” vs “rented by the production” logic applies to other production props that were cobbled together and altered in such a way that they could not be returned to a prop house, such as the macrobinoculars and Ben’s belt hanger saber...which increases the likelihood that they may both be in Europe, somewhere.
Last edited: