<div class='quotetop'>(Hez @ Oct 20 2006, 01:53 PM) [snapback]1341554[/snapback]</div>
Hez,
Thanks for the drunken advice, it was actually useful. :lol
I do know that there's no such thing as 'close enough' as far as ACCURACY is concerned. What I'm talking about is just trying to match the virtual camera of my CAD software to the actual camera used to take the picture for the VD. It's tough, given the unique distortion qualities of real-world lenses.
Changes made:
* Read grip shroud cutout now comes from top (rather than side)
* First pommel step beveled and corrected
* Last pommel step before endcap rounded
Anything else you see?
[attachmentid=10609]
Zenkai, with regards to the pommel, the diameter is only part of it. It is initially a 90 degree angle, which then maybe 1mm afterwards turns into the shape you're showing. The MR Elite was actually right on this aspect.
There is no 'close enough', as you well know.I got 'close enough', as a few people here will say, I'm sure, but it's not perfect. I would add the one detail to mine if I could.
Slightly (very) drunk, so apologies if this makes no sense...
[/b]
Hez,
Thanks for the drunken advice, it was actually useful. :lol
I do know that there's no such thing as 'close enough' as far as ACCURACY is concerned. What I'm talking about is just trying to match the virtual camera of my CAD software to the actual camera used to take the picture for the VD. It's tough, given the unique distortion qualities of real-world lenses.
Changes made:
* Read grip shroud cutout now comes from top (rather than side)
* First pommel step beveled and corrected
* Last pommel step before endcap rounded
Anything else you see?
[attachmentid=10609]