Indiana Jones 5 officially announced

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.


Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

ALLEY

Master Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
D1E7FD65-48DF-484E-9376-E43643F519B0.jpeg


Well, now. I never thought Karen Allen would have to clarify that she does not, in fact, see Indiana Jones as a pedophile. That is a jaw-dropper of a headline.

Indiana Jones has officially been around long enough to be considered “problematic” for 2021.

(Shrugs shoulders…)

OK.
 

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Psab keel

Master Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
View attachment 1465706

Well, now. I never thought Karen Allen would have to clarify that she does not, in fact, see Indiana Jones as a pedophile. That is a jaw-dropper of a headline.

Indiana Jones has officially been around long enough to be considered “problematic” for 2021.

(Shrugs shoulders…)

OK.


Isn't it amazing how even fictional characters now have to apologize for being fictional?
 

Usagi Pilgrim

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
I knew it was coming!

On my rewatch, when she said "I was a child", I chuckled cause I knew what was on the horizon. I didn't realize she'd addressed it on the 4K BTS stuff. I'm actually surprised that she said she thought Marion was physically 16. I figured the powers-that-be would've had her retcon it to where she was 18, but 'emotionally a child' or some such nonsense.

Anyways, the stupid parade continues.
 

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Lightning

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
. I figured the powers-that-be would've had her retcon it to where she was 18, but 'emotionally a child' or some such nonsense.

If I remember correctly, Marion's official birthdate, released as part of the Crystal Skull promotional material has her at 18 during the relationship. Unfortunately the Indiana Jones website used flash in 2008 so the Wayback Machine is useless.
 

Prop Collector

Well-Known Member
View attachment 1465706

Well, now. I never thought Karen Allen would have to clarify that she does not, in fact, see Indiana Jones as a pedophile. That is a jaw-dropper of a headline.

Indiana Jones has officially been around long enough to be considered “problematic” for 2021.

(Shrugs shoulders…)

OK.

Oh good, I was worried I wouldn't see something idiotic today.
 

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Riceball

Master Member
In Campbell Black's novel adaption of the film, Indy had a "student" over for the night when Brody arrived to announced he got the job to go after the Ark.
Like pretty much all novelizations, it probably wasn't based on the actual shooting script but an earlier draft. So Indy was probably a slightly different character in this earlier draft and got changed to the Indy we all know and love in the final shooting draft of the script.
 

Psab keel

Master Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
As far as I knew they actually shot the scenes with the student staying the night when Marcus arrives. I could be wrong though.
 

Remote People

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
As far as I knew they actually shot the scenes with the student staying the night when Marcus arrives. I could be wrong though.
Yes. In fact when we see first Marcus in the hallway outside the classroom there is a girl as well. She was Indy's love interest. Also Indy hands Marcus a tumbler for the champagne later at his house. Why? Because he seems to only have two glasses, both of which were in use when Marcus turned up that evening.

uATgYI0.jpg
 
Last edited:

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Top