Indiana Jones 5 officially announced

Yes! I noticed the exact same, and was waiting for somebody to bring it up! A friend of mine asked me how Phoebe Walker-Bridge is in the movie, and I said she's like if Indy went on an adventure with a female Belloq.
YES!!! I'm so happy I wasnt the only one who caught it! I wish they explored that a bit more honestly, as Indy always had a history with the antiquities black market so when they did explore it I was really happy. I just wished he delved more into that world and we really saw that rift between the two of them more.

I will say her version of short round was kinda pointless, I think they could have casted a stronger child actor or just cut the character out and featured her version of Sallah. Then Indy would have been facing his true polar opposite.

But yeah, I think if you go into the film with a real understanding of Indy and shaw's relationship, you'll have a better time. I kept away from spoilers shy of what the trailer showed, so I went into it fresh and had a really good time. I think it was also because I was just unloading all the baggage from KOTCS hahaha
 
The whole point of making movies is to make money. Spending an estimated $500 million to make a movie (production/marketing/reshoots) for a movie that will never make a profit is idiotic. Therefore, it is Disney's fault. They did something that was guaranteed to fail financially.
...But that makes too much sense...there has to be another reason, like theater fatigue...like inflation...the fans...Covid, which of course i reject ALL those excuses, along with the fact the Ford wanted this story to be told. Not sure what they paid him to do this movie but if they knew all these facts going in and just said, "Yes, Harrison...whatever you say" and willingly spend $300-$500 million to make this movie specifically for 40yrs and up movie goers then yes...not very smart. If we are witnessing the death of movie theaters then we are witnessing the death of movies entirely. If streaming is the way to go then why would any studio spend millions to get a negative return? The movies will be cheaper, look cheaper and actors salaries will diminish fast, especially now that we deepfake everything now. If streaming services have thousands of movies to choose from that are now cheaper and lower budget, and nothing but retcons, then of course the return on investment will be thinner. You would think, the more competition, the better the product that will eventually happen but when it's bad vs worse, who actually wins and who actually loses? They might want to start thinking ahead and start making something new. I can see an explosion of animated movies on the rise due to these costs, and the storytelling might actually be more effective in these anyways. Looks to me like "Champagne wishes and Caviar dreams" will be a thing of the past real soon...and they did it to themselves...nobody else's fault but their own...stop blaming everyone else folks. The message from the fans based on revenue is this:

"We will no longer give you our money in exchange for crap! You shouldn't have made this movie. Did you not learn from the last one?"

What Iger will be saying behind closed doors after the fallout:

"We never should have made this movie...we should have learned our lesson from the last one."

A good majority hated the last Indiana Jones. To say this one was better means nothing, especially even if it was better, it lost way more revenue.
Because sadly that's often what happens. Look at King Arthur. He did not live happily ever after. But it doesn't always have to happen that way. Some heroes get their happily ever after. But when stories do continue past that, it's typically pretty tragic.
So what you're saying is, if Lucasfilm remains around for just a wee bit longer then their ending will be pretty tragic...I can actually see that taking place...lol
Why do all of the legacy characters who've already had their happy ending end up old, alone, and miserable? When did this become a trope?
Because we have an old, miserable company at the helm who takes great pleasure in destroying things that are great in order to build themselves up and as they deceive people into giving them their money they get to lecture you in return about " this is the real world kid, better get used to it...your going to be alone, grow old and die, especially if you're a man, because women rule now anyways...mmmuuuaahhhaaha!!!" In a fictional universe, no less. Yeah, have fun and bring your family along for the ride in our great mundane world of retcons and character deconstruction...and remember...since we have to make everything fair and equal, happy endings have been trope long enough so its time for misery to have its turn. Riiigghht! Because we all love handing our money to the carnival guy so we can be stuck upside down on the top of the Ferriswheel for half a century.
Saw the movie, actually liked it. I think it was because I was just looking for the nonsense from Crystal Skull and when it didnt appear, I was just happily relieved haha.
There is no Nuke the Fridge Moment
There is no King of the Monkeys Moment
There is no Three Waterfalls of Doom moment
There is no Breakdancing Mayans Moment
And there was no Aliens....

Wow didnt know my list was so extensive till I wrote it all out haha.

That said the movie has some good nuggets or concepts in it, I just wished they explored it more. But the biggest boo hoo thing I keep reading or hearing about from critics is Indy's Goddaughter Shaw. I blame the trailers, but the relationship between Indy and Shaw isnt as simple as Godparent and Goddaughter. Basically she's a embodiment of Indy's guilt for her father, and she kind of becomes the anti Indy, as she actually deals in the black market antiquities trade. So Indy and her have a very troubled relationship because he sees her as something he needs to save, and she see's him as the reason her father when mad. So their dynamic made sense when you understand what their relationship really is.

Which is isnt "Female Indy replace old Male Indy". That was never the dynamic. If anything she actually serves more as a female Beloq, she even dresses like Beloq at one point during the last act of the movie. And there is a cool call back to the watch which is a easter egg from Raiders.

That said there is a fantastical ending, but its more in line with the Ark melting Nazis or Voodoo from India removing living hearts, or Eternal life via the Holy Grail. Its not the ending I see written here with Old Indy meeting young Indy or anything, but it is fantastical. I personally liked it, it was handled well enough and there is a cameo at the end which again is a nice, relaxing, peaceful call back to Raiders.

Also the De-Aging scene was honestly really fun and entertaining. I told the people I saw the movie with I wish it was half the movie lol. They did a really good job, eat your heart out DC. Cant remove a friggin mustache lol. Also it was good seeing Indy punch Nazis. Any movie where you get a good Nazi Punching quota is aces with me. the more Nazis you punch, the better. If there is a sequel, it should just be a montage of Indy punching Nazis.
-Josh
So...it was better than the Indy movie that everyone hates...that's not saying much and Helena doesn't replace Indy but copies Belloq's character and there were a lot of callbacks( copies) and easter eggs? Not saying this personally to you Josh, but is that the new standard for movies now? Little plot, pointless characters, callbacks, easter eggs, homages and copies, better than the worst...I mean, let me take an order of Raiders ball scene, with a side of Crusades train, a little Temple airplane drop and a side of Raiders pulling the gun on the swordsman, but leave out the aliens but give me a little Crusade underground water tunnels and we'll call it something new. It isn't new...it's another TFA, take a bunch of ingredients, throw it in the blender and make a smoothie out of it and call it Indiana Jones because that's what the title says and by golly, Harrison Ford is in it and wants it this way. Well...they're getting what they wanted I guess...failed expectations. Maybe someone will do a movie about Lucasfilm someday. " Kingdom with the Thickest Skull" or " The Last Facade" or perhaps, " Matters of the Lost Heart" and the " Temple of Gloom".
Marvel comics have nearly always had heavy moralistic undertones. X-Men was always about the evils of racism, Cap punched Hitler on the cover, female characters are often equivalent or more powerful than male ones in ensemble stories. It has literally always been there. The only thing that's changed is now there's a corporate media machine telling you it's ruined because of it's "wokeness."
Corporate media machine? 95% of the media is promoting the wokeness and you're calling the 5% who are pushing back the machine? Good grief, you have it bass ackwards. " beep-beep beep Breaking News ! Breaking News! 3 more films announced with a British brunette female lead who happens to be a Skywalker now, even though she's a Palpatine? ( But I thought they were moving away from the Skywalkers?)

Good golly miss Molly! Can we please have a break from this torture? Can we please be done with this for good? I'm sure Rey will eagerly explain to her new recruits how names don't matter and how to rewrite history by just being whoever you want to be at any given time, as she gleefully denounces the Skywalker and Palpatine name for the sake of unifying her new order...gag me. First recruit? Helena Shaw-Skywalker-Jones...lol...gotta have the hyphenated name.
 
The rumor is that there was a Young Indy (Indy from WW2) and 1969 Indy. 1940's Indy dies to save 1969 Indy and Helena at which point 1969 Indy fades away. Helena grabs the hat and whip and becomes Indiana Jones and a montage ensues where Indy's classic moments from the original three films are replacements with her instead of Ford literally erasing Harrison Ford's Indiana Jones from existence. I can't say with any certainty that this was definitively shot, but that is the plot rumor which prompted the last minute reshoots after the test screenings left audiences infuriated at the idea.

The reshoots have been confirmed by John Williams own mouth as he had to score a new ending for the movie because the writers came up with a new ending a few months before the movie released. There's no contesting that part. As for the above rumor, there's no way to tell what really happened and Lucasfilm would never admit to that openly. So I guess Helena punching Harrison out cold to drag him back to 1969 was the best they could cobble together... :rolleyes:

The fact that there were reshoots, even of the ending, is no strange thing. The modern era of movie making has changed and now reshoots are just considered part of the process. They are even factored into the budget.

As far as the "Helena goes back and replaces Indy" notion, the only place I've ever seen that rumor is from angry fanboys with an agenda to create hate for the film before it ever came out. In fact, I think I remember this rumor originating on 4Chan.

Not only has Mangold squashed this rumor by claiming the ending was not drastically changed, but even Karen Allen has said she received the script months before shooting and her scenes were "essentially as filmed." Besides, if anyone thinks Harrison Ford would have signed off on an ending that replaces him, they clearly have not been listening to him in interviews adamantly claiming HE is the only Indy.

More likely, they did some minor reshoots of the climax and ending for pacing / clarity, and THAT'S what John Williams had to rescore.
 
...But that makes too much sense...there has to be another reason, like theater fatigue...like inflation...the fans...Covid, which of course i reject ALL those excuses, along with the fact the Ford wanted this story to be told. Not sure what they paid him to do this movie but if they knew all these facts going in and just said, "Yes, Harrison...whatever you say" and willingly spend $300-$500 million to make this movie specifically for 40yrs and up movie goers then yes...not very smart. If we are witnessing the death of movie theaters then we are witnessing the death of movies entirely. If streaming is the way to go then why would any studio spend millions to get a negative return? The movies will be cheaper, look cheaper and actors salaries will diminish fast, especially now that we deepfake everything now. If streaming services have thousands of movies to choose from that are now cheaper and lower budget, and nothing but retcons, then of course the return on investment will be thinner. You would think, the more competition, the better the product that will eventually happen but when it's bad vs worse, who actually wins and who actually loses? They might want to start thinking ahead and start making something new. I can see an explosion of animated movies on the rise due to these costs, and the storytelling might actually be more effective in these anyways. Looks to me like "Champagne wishes and Caviar dreams" will be a thing of the past real soon...and they did it to themselves...nobody else's fault but their own...stop blaming everyone else folks. The message from the fans based on revenue is this:

"We will no longer give you our money in exchange for crap! You shouldn't have made this movie. Did you not learn from the last one?"

What Iger will be saying behind closed doors after the fallout:

"We never should have made this movie...we should have learned our lesson from the last one."

A good majority hated the last Indiana Jones. To say this one was better means nothing, especially even if it was better, it lost way more revenue.

So what you're saying is, if Lucasfilm remains around for just a wee bit longer then their ending will be pretty tragic...I can actually see that taking place...lol

Because we have an old, miserable company at the helm who takes great pleasure in destroying things that are great in order to build themselves up and as they deceive people into giving them their money they get to lecture you in return about " this is the real world kid, better get used to it...your going to be alone, grow old and die, especially if you're a man, because women rule now anyways...mmmuuuaahhhaaha!!!" In a fictional universe, no less. Yeah, have fun and bring your family along for the ride in our great mundane world of retcons and character deconstruction...and remember...since we have to make everything fair and equal, happy endings have been trope long enough so its time for misery to have its turn. Riiigghht! Because we all love handing our money to the carnival guy so we can be stuck upside down on the top of the Ferriswheel for half a century.

So...it was better than the Indy movie that everyone hates...that's not saying much and Helena doesn't replace Indy but copies Belloq's character and there were a lot of callbacks( copies) and easter eggs? Not saying this personally to you Josh, but is that the new standard for movies now? Little plot, pointless characters, callbacks, easter eggs, homages and copies, better than the worst...I mean, let me take an order of Raiders ball scene, with a side of Crusades train, a little Temple airplane drop and a side of Raiders pulling the gun on the swordsman, but leave out the aliens but give me a little Crusade underground water tunnels and we'll call it something new. It isn't new...it's another TFA, take a bunch of ingredients, throw it in the blender and make a smoothie out of it and call it Indiana Jones because that's what the title says and by golly, Harrison Ford is in it and wants it this way. Well...they're getting what they wanted I guess...failed expectations. Maybe someone will do a movie about Lucasfilm someday. " Kingdom with the Thickest Skull" or " The Last Facade" or perhaps, " Matters of the Lost Heart" and the " Temple of Gloom".

Corporate media machine? 95% of the media is promoting the wokeness and you're calling the 5% who are pushing back the machine? Good grief, you have it bass ackwards. " beep-beep beep Breaking News ! Breaking News! 3 more films announced with a British brunette female lead who happens to be a Skywalker now, even though she's a Palpatine? ( But I thought they were moving away from the Skywalkers?)

Good golly miss Molly! Can we please have a break from this torture? Can we please be done with this for good? I'm sure Rey will eagerly explain to her new recruits how names don't matter and how to rewrite history by just being whoever you want to be at any given time, as she gleefully denounces the Skywalker and Palpatine name for the sake of unifying her new order...gag me. First recruit? Helena Shaw-Skywalker-Jones...lol...gotta have the hyphenated name.

Lol gotta love a person who says "This isnt personal" right before they just make it personal. Ah message boards, forgot how catty they could be, puts Facebook to shame.

That said its ok if you didnt like it dude, just as its ok for me to like it. I dont think anyone who saw this movie cant admit they have baggage going into it. I guess it just depends on what kind of baggage one brings will dictate what you will get out of that experience.

Could the movie have been better? Sure, like I said there were nuggets of fun original ideals they could have expanded on. The Nazi connection to the US Space program was actually a interesting plot unto itself.

Could the movie have been worse, yeah sure. We saw how bad it could be, and that WAS under Speilberg and George.

Is it yet another souless remake by Hollywood to prey on nostalgia? Sure....or....maybe the people involved just wanted to end things on a different note.

That said you clearly didnt like it. Which hey, thats ok.
And I clearly did like it, and hey, thats ok too.
We can just agree to that and move on, nothing personal ;)
 
The Black market should have been in Marrakesh, that would jave been a fun callback. Could even have seen the idol in a shop window.
OMG yes I would have loved that. I really think the black market auction should have been explored more. Its pretty much what makes Indy tick. And he even states he knows where the idol is back in Raiders so it would have been fun for him to just close out that chapter of his life. But at the same time I'm glad they didnt go too heavy handed with the easter eggs. They feel more inside baseball with this film which is nice.
 
The fact that there were reshoots, even of the ending, is no strange thing. The modern era of movie making has changed and now reshoots are just considered part of the process. They are even factored into the budget.

As far as the "Helena goes back and replaces Indy" notion, the only place I've ever seen that rumor is from angry fanboys with an agenda to create hate for the film before it ever came out. In fact, I think I remember this rumor originating on 4Chan.

Not only has Mangold squashed this rumor by claiming the ending was not drastically changed, but even Karen Allen has said she received the script months before shooting and her scenes were "essentially as filmed." Besides, if anyone thinks Harrison Ford would have signed off on an ending that replaces him, they clearly have not been listening to him in interviews adamantly claiming HE is the only Indy.

More likely, they did some minor reshoots of the climax and ending for pacing / clarity, and THAT'S what John Williams had to rescore.

Reshoots (Pick Up Shots) are commonplace in the industry for tentpole movies. No question there. I was just reiterating what the rumored ending was, though, as we all know, there's no way to confirm any of it. Ultimately it's a moot point. The movie is out. It is what it is.

As far as the fanboys..... I find it interesting that people seem shocked by their response to these movies given the volatile nature the studios have fostered in these communities. Ultimately the studio is responsible for the quality of their product. Not the fans. No other industry I'm aware of blames the failure of their products on the customers, but Hollywood has insulated itself by wealth and influence to do just that. Blame the fans for their choices. At some point their industry is going to collapse on itself for its stubbornness to change. I'm not saying that as a threat, but as an observation because we're seeing things shifting as we speak. They keep refusing to take ownership of anything. Then I can't take ownership of how much I dislike their crap movies and shows. I mean what does either perspective accomplish other than widen the gap?

Something has to give and I feel no sympathy for a system that feels no empathy for me or my peers. As a small business owner I have no issue with a studio making money, but if you drive away enough customers, that's on the studio. It's simple economics. They're literally paying for their choices.
 
Because sadly that's often what happens. Look at King Arthur. He did not live happily ever after. But it doesn't always have to happen that way. Some heroes get their happily ever after. But when stories do continue past that, it's typically pretty tragic.
The animator could suffer a fatal heart attack...

(hey, it worked in Monty Python and the Holy Grail... )
 
The rumor is that there was a Young Indy (Indy from WW2) and 1969 Indy. 1940's Indy dies to save 1969 Indy and Helena at which point 1969 Indy fades away. Helena grabs the hat and whip and becomes Indiana Jones and a montage ensues where Indy's classic moments from the original three films are replacements with her instead of Ford literally erasing Harrison Ford's Indiana Jones from existence. I can't say with any certainty that this was definitively shot, but that is the plot rumor which prompted the last minute reshoots after the test screenings left audiences infuriated at the idea.

The reshoots have been confirmed by John Williams own mouth as he had to score a new ending for the movie because the writers came up with a new ending a few months before the movie released. There's no contesting that part. As for the above rumor, there's no way to tell what really happened and Lucasfilm would never admit to that openly. So I guess Helena punching Harrison out cold to drag him back to 1969 was the best they could cobble together... :rolleyes:
Nah, she would have only replaced the Crystal NumbSkull and Dial of Diarrhea Destiny Indys; Temple of Doom was 1935, Raiders was 1936, and Last Crusade was 1938.

She actually would have done him a favor!
 
As far as the fanboys..... I find it interesting that people seem shocked by their response to these movies given the volatile nature the studios have fostered in these communities. Ultimately the studio is responsible for the quality of their product. Not the fans. No other industry I'm aware of blames the failure of their products on the customers, but Hollywood has insulated itself by wealth and influence to do just that. Blame the fans for their choices. At some point their industry is going to collapse on itself for its stubbornness to change. I'm not saying that as a threat, but as an observation because we're seeing things shifting as we speak. They keep refusing to take ownership of anything. Then I can't take ownership of how much I dislike their crap movies and shows. I mean what does either perspective accomplish other than widen the gap?

But is it really the studios that fostered this? Or the performative anger perpetuated by a very toxic group of the fandom?

There's no denying that there are groups of people determined to trash these movies sometimes before they ever even enter production. The rumor that the Helena character is going to retroactively replace Indy is an excellent example of that. There were highly detailed and produced videos posted literally the day that Dial of Destiny was released absolutely trashing the film, and in some of those videos, the vague or even blatantly incorrect details of the plot make it clear that some of these videos were finished well in advance of the creator seeing the film. They just want the hate clicks.

I'm not absolving the studios of all blame, but there's no denying that outside of genuine like or dislike of a property, there is a VERY loud subset of the fandom that delights in fostering hate of these properties, too.
 
Lol gotta love a person who says "This isnt personal" right before they just make it personal. Ah message boards, forgot how catty they could be, puts Facebook to shame.

That said its ok if you didnt like it dude, just as its ok for me to like it. I dont think anyone who saw this movie cant admit they have baggage going into it. I guess it just depends on what kind of baggage one brings will dictate what you will get out of that experience.

Could the movie have been better? Sure, like I said there were nuggets of fun original ideals they could have expanded on. The Nazi connection to the US Space program was actually a interesting plot unto itself.

Could the movie have been worse, yeah sure. We saw how bad it could be, and that WAS under Speilberg and George.

Is it yet another souless remake by Hollywood to prey on nostalgia? Sure....or....maybe the people involved just wanted to end things on a different note.

That said you clearly didnt like it. Which hey, thats ok.
And I clearly did like it, and hey, thats ok too.
We can just agree to that and move on, nothing personal ;)
I appreciate your honesty in your assessment , I never made it personal at all, just using what you said, like others said as well to make a point. Yeah, of course, if you like all the things that you described then who am I to say you shouldn't? I have no beef with you personally, lol, don't even know you. Perhaps it was too late and I shouldn't of multiquoted( which i never do). I'm a pretty light hearted guy and those that know me know that. I have nothing personal against anyone on here at all but I can understand how my frustration can be communicated on here.( might have been my longest post ever...lol). I did get carried away...just a little...lol. You're right though...glad you liked it. Sam I Am has been chasing me all over the place to try green eggs and ham, and I keep telling him, I do not like them Sam I Am. Lol. Honestly, I'm upset at myself for posting all that...I knew better because I know it doesn't do a bit of good and it really makes no difference in anyone's mind anyways. Have fun on here.
 
I wish I was a fly on the wall at Lucasfilm today. Word is all department heads are being pulled in from their holiday vacations for an “emergency” meeting due to the catastrophic opening weekend of Indy. Disney possibly looking to layoff non essential staff to mitigate the financial damage the movie has cost them. “Supposedly” Leslye Hedland has received walking papers and her Acolyte series is going to quietly be buried.
 
I wish I was a fly on the wall at Lucasfilm today. Word is all department heads are being pulled in from their holiday vacations for an “emergency” meeting due to the catastrophic opening weekend of Indy. Disney possibly looking to layoff non essential staff to mitigate the financial damage the movie has cost them. “Supposedly” Leslye Hedland has received walking papers and her Acolyte series is going to quietly be buried.

  • Who is the source of this rumor?
  • Does he wear a helmet or have a last name that rhymes with “hero”?
;)
 
The rumor has been going for a couple weeks but they already said it’s not true.


IMG_2386.jpeg
 
Reshoots -

This movie started filming in early 2021 (after the worst of Covid was over) and was scheduled to release in summer 2022. They did the production wrap party in the spring of 2022, a full year later.

Then the release date was pushed back a full year to summer of 2023. The final budget was well over $300m. Harrison pocketed $20m but there were no other huge actor costs.

Does this final result look like about $300m on the screen? If it wasn't heavily re-shot then it begs the question what the hell else was going on. Personally I think this movie looks like maybe $180m on the screen plus the Harrison de-aging CGI bill.


All but two of Kennedy's Lucasfilm movies have needed major reshoots. On her 4th one they had to reshoot 80% of it, which is basically making the movie twice to get one usable version. Her 5th movie ran $100m over budget and it was slammed together in the last weeks before release. 'Dial of Destiny' is her 6th one.

Yes, they re-shot the living crap out of Indy#5. That's the most logical explanation.
 
But is it really the studios that fostered this? Or the performative anger perpetuated by a very toxic group of the fandom?

There's no denying that there are groups of people determined to trash these movies sometimes before they ever even enter production. The rumor that the Helena character is going to retroactively replace Indy is an excellent example of that. There were highly detailed and produced videos posted literally the day that Dial of Destiny was released absolutely trashing the film, and in some of those videos, the vague or even blatantly incorrect details of the plot make it clear that some of these videos were finished well in advance of the creator seeing the film. They just want the hate clicks.

I'm not absolving the studios of all blame, but there's no denying that outside of genuine like or dislike of a property, there is a VERY loud subset of the fandom that delights in fostering hate of these properties, too.

I get what you're saying.

But so what? Have you ever heard a Chevy guy cut loose on Fords?


Hollywood's reaction to fan backlash is ridiculous. They are grown adults in business to make money by selling products, with many of the buyers being kids & teenagers. They should be able to handle mudslinging without stooping to that level.

It's the 21st century. Memes happen. Keyboard warriors throw turds. Get over it.

It reminds me of these incidents where a 13yo kid gets shot by US cops because he fails to perfectly obey orders and pose a 0.000% risk to them. Why are people expecting the unarmed 13yo to be the adult in the room? Why are they making excuses for professional armed adults flying off the handle & responding emotionally?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top