Indiana Jones 5 officially announced

I just read this article in Den of Geek(not sure how true or accurate because i don't usually quote from the internet)
But this is what Mangold described as his reasoning for the ending.

For those reasons, Mangold — who co-wrote the script with Jez Butterworth, John-Henry Butterworth, and David Koepp — sees the film as less a time travel story and more an exploration of the concept of time itself. “It’s about time, it’s about getting older and it’s about the world changing around you,” he argued. “And as long as there’s been Indiana Jones movies, the power of the relic has always had some kind of dialogue with the theme of the movie itself. So it was no shocker.”

In the same way, Helena’s decision to punch out Indy at the end of the movie wasn’t about shocking audiences or putting her over Jones to set up a new hero. Rather, it came from a real need she had as a character.

“She loves him and she needs a father. She needs him,” Mangold said of Helena’s actions. “Her father died when she was young and the godfather never showed. And so this movie became a chance for this particular father to prove himself again, and in his own way, climb out of the grief he felt about his own loss.”

So, that's what you do to someone you profess to love and need?..punch them in the face? To me it sounds like they were playing back on the time Marion slapped Indy in the face in Raiders but i lack context. The takeaway i have is that these themes are deep and may warrant a closer look but if you dive in their too deep wouldn't that be too much of a distraction for a supposed, light-hearted adventure film? I mean divorce?...experienced it as a child and as an adult...A son dying? I have 3 sons and can't even imagine, am almost in tears even thinking about that...being at the end of your life with no hope? Sure, these are real things but come on...this is supposed to be Indiana Jones. If we were kids watching this(even though there was serious tones in the originals too) there is way too much depression going on here. If this wasn't meant for kids? That would explain why people aren't showing up as well. We were kids when Indy first came to us and we loved it. If the target audience is 40 and up, well...you have your answer. lol
 
thanks for listening, i appreciate the discussion.

Yeah same, no worries man.

Maybe I'll just say, if you haven't seen the movie yet—and this goes for anyone reading this thread who haven't watched it—maybe go see it? If the concern is that you won't like it and by watching it you're supporting the machine making these... well, sure, but I don't think there's anything stopping that now. I wasn't expecting to like it, in the end I didn't like it very much, but I was interested in seeing the last Indiana Jones project that had Spielberg and Lucas involved at some point during its development. In that sense, it was definitely an interesting watch. I don't think I'll watch anything else they make now. I don't care about a Short Round or Young Marion Disney Plus TV show. I don't care about some reboot or prequel with another actor directed by some indie filmmaker hot off Venice or Berlin who was given a load of money to supervise conversation scenes. This is my last stop. But I was still interested enough to continue until this stop. Anyone else—if you're still interested, even if it's just curiosity about how the de-aging tech looked or the cinematography, then just watch the things. Until the day you genuinely don't care anymore.
 
Exactly, remember Siskel and Ebert? They were movie critics. Were they right all the time? No, they disagreed a lot but i never heard them say fans are just unreasonable and are to blame for the success or failure of the movie itself.
Well actually...

Roger Ebert on Fandom.png
 
I said I don't remember...and I never " heard" them say...plus, whatever quote this is from( i knew someone would try to find something on them ..lol) he still didn't blame them for the success or failure of movies. Plus, it's equally boring talking to Paid film critics whose job it is to criticize as many of us would be retired by now pretty wealthy....lol
 
It’s killing me I can’t see Indy in the theater right now…

I’m post massive surgery (emphasis on mass) and stuck on the couch for the next few weeks. I have an insane setup at home and throwing in booze and weed for viewings make it a great way to view movies…. BUT.

There is NOTHING I love more than randomly on a weeknight opening my phone, seeing what playing in the multiplex down the street (I live in Downton Vancouver) and just walk down and see something random.

I get the same seat - right behind wheelchair so there’s a bar to put my feet up on. I grab an over priced Coke Zero, and watch whatever on the biggest screen possible.

And then I get to walk home through the city and reflect.

So yeah, I want the theatres to stay… I like both viewing experiences - and sometimes the theater way more cuz it FORCES me to stay (mostly, rather than just pausing when bored and finding something else)

Also, it’s easier to choose from 6 movies than 1000’s… I don’t spend hours hunting and then just rewatching Succession again.

I really hope Indy stays in long enough that I can to take my dad to it… but the flash is already slated for home release so I’m doubtful….
 
While there is some truth to this, there are just as many well rounded, educated, and mature adults who enjoy this stuff on a "fan" level who buck the ideas presented here. It's also funny coming from a movie critics who's career is basically being a movie nerd. Lol
I'm a fan. I enjoy these things. My wife and I watched Raiders over the weekend because we wanted to see a good Indy movie. I think he's talking about fanatics. The people who wrap their entire lives around it. The people who think they somehow have ownership of it. Those are the people who are annoying to be around. Siskel and Ebert liked watching and talking about movies. They didn't, in the middle of an unrelated review, pop up with "hey, can we talk about Star Wars?" That's where you get all of the toxic garbage, I think. The people who can't stop talking about it and have to be right all the time.
 
I appreciate your honesty in your assessment , I never made it personal at all, just using what you said, like others said as well to make a point. Yeah, of course, if you like all the things that you described then who am I to say you shouldn't? I have no beef with you personally, lol, don't even know you. Perhaps it was too late and I shouldn't of multiquoted( which i never do). I'm a pretty light hearted guy and those that know me know that. I have nothing personal against anyone on here at all but I can understand how my frustration can be communicated on here.( might have been my longest post ever...lol). I did get carried away...just a little...lol. You're right though...glad you liked it. Sam I Am has been chasing me all over the place to try green eggs and ham, and I keep telling him, I do not like them Sam I Am. Lol. Honestly, I'm upset at myself for posting all that...I knew better because I know it doesn't do a bit of good and it really makes no difference in anyone's mind anyways. Have fun on here.

No worries man I know how it is to be apart of passionate debate. I've been apart of a few myself. If anything I tell people when a franchise gets this much division its actually a compliment, it means it left a lasting mark with everyone when the first Raiders film premiered and people willing to defend or debate it only means they have an emotional stake to it in some form. In order to have an emotional stake, ya gotta Love it. And I see how much people do love the Indy series, and alot are just afraid of it being hollowed out and reused like alot of other franchises have been in Hollywood (Cough cough Terminator). But its a real justified fear, and I get it. I do, I have my own franchises that I love and I am not a fan of where they ultimately led to.

To put it simply we fight for the things we love, and we want to see them treated right. And thats what I see here, people fighting for a film series they love, and they just want to see it treated right. Its kinda heartwarming to see when you see it from that perspective.

My best to you as well. Here's to chatting more here in the future :)
 
You know, THAT would have been a good movie. I am assuming the Disney/Lucasfilm was referring the work of actual Nazi engineers working for the U.S. government post WW2 during Operation Paperclip, especially Wernher von Braun. Who, in a truth-is-stranger-than-fiction sort of way, ended up working with Walt Disney??!!

View attachment 1716175

Yeah I was quite surprised they referenced project paper clip but it makes sense, that was definitely a Paramount thing I'm sure. Even during the film I was a bit confused why Indy was all sour about the space program, as a scientists you would think he would be more engaged with reaching the outer limits of space itself.

Then.....they brought in the Nazi factor and it all clicked with me, I even whispered to myself during the film "Paperclip" and everyone around me just looked at me quizzically. It was a funny moment haha. That coupled with the CIA, I think it should have made up at least the first half of the film. Indy either running from the CIA to clear his name and track down Shaw or....the CIA framing Indy to force him to work for them to infiltrate the black market antiquities world. I think both concepts were definitely very interesting to themselves.

But considering Disney's involvement with this film, I'm happy and surprised they touched up on it at all. Like I said, Indy is all about fighting and punching Nazis. Disney kinda kept Captain America on a short leash concerning this, I'm glad they let Indy do what he does best, punch Nazis lol.
 
No worries man I know how it is to be apart of passionate debate. I've been apart of a few myself. If anything I tell people when a franchise gets this much division its actually a compliment, it means it left a lasting mark with everyone when the first Raiders film premiered and people willing to defend or debate it only means they have an emotional stake to it in some form. In order to have an emotional stake, ya gotta Love it. And I see how much people do love the Indy series, and alot are just afraid of it being hollowed out and reused like alot of other franchises have been in Hollywood (Cough cough Terminator). But its a real justified fear, and I get it. I do, I have my own franchises that I love and I am not a fan of where they ultimately led to.

To put it simply we fight for the things we love, and we want to see them treated right. And thats what I see here, people fighting for a film series they love, and they just want to see it treated right. Its kinda heartwarming to see when you see it from that perspective.

My best to you as well. Here's to chatting more here in the future :)
I appreciate that but i must allow myself ...and others a reprieve...lol, for atleast 24hrs. I try so hard to fight against the urge to respond or post. I went a long time actually before all this but i had an injury and it set me back because i had more down time. I must own my end of my decision making..lol. I just really hope this generation can get a classic that will be as good as what we got when we were kids. Have a fun time. see you around but probably not for a while..(hey! i heard that applause in the back ground...lol)
 
I appreciate that but i must allow myself ...and others a reprieve...lol, for atleast 24hrs. I try so hard to fight against the urge to respond or post. I went a long time actually before all this but i had an injury and it set me back because i had more down time. I must own my end of my decision making..lol. I just really hope this generation can get a classic that will be as good as what we got when we were kids. Have a fun time. see you around but probably not for a while..(hey! i heard that applause in the back ground...lol)
ren and stimpy nicksplat GIF


You know you want to!
 
Exactly, remember Siskel and Ebert? They were movie critics. Were they right all the time? No, they disagreed a lot but i never heard them say fans are just unreasonable and are to blame for the success or failure of the movie itself.
The difference between Siskel and Ebert and other professional critics is that they don't preemptively judge a film to fit some kind of agenda.

The second Phoebe Waller-Bridge was attached to Dial of Destiny, there was a very vocal and very angry group of fans who decided to hate the film just for that bit of casting. Without a scrap of evidence to support themselves, they claimed the film was going to be "woke" and that the purpose of Waller-Bridge was to literally erase Indy. And even now, many of those same voices are all backpedaling and saying they were right all along, and the director and cast are all lying and really did reshoot the film - again, without a scrap of evidence to support it. But hey, it gets them clicks.

Anyone who pretends that these very loud and very angry voices don't have an influence on the performance of films, at least to some degree, is naïve. For better or worse (mostly worse), we live in an era where social media absolutely influences brands.
 
The difference between Siskel and Ebert and other professional critics is that they don't preemptively judge a film to fit some kind of agenda.

The second Phoebe Waller-Bridge was attached to Dial of Destiny, there was a very vocal and very angry group of fans who decided to hate the film just for that bit of casting. Without a scrap of evidence to support themselves, they claimed the film was going to be "woke" and that the purpose of Waller-Bridge was to literally erase Indy. And even now, many of those same voices are all backpedaling and saying they were right all along, and the director and cast are all lying and really did reshoot the film - again, without a scrap of evidence to support it. But hey, it gets them clicks.

Anyone who pretends that these very loud and very angry voices don't have an influence on the performance of films, at least to some degree, is naïve. For better or worse (mostly worse), we live in an era where social media absolutely influences brands.
....

EDIT:

I had a long, 'unloading my frustrations-type' post typed up, but the better part of discretion has won out, so I'll just say-

Well said, bravo, & prepare for the response from the echo chamber, cause it's-a-comin'.
 
It’s killing me I can’t see Indy in the theater right now…

I’m post massive surgery (emphasis on mass) and stuck on the couch for the next few weeks. I have an insane setup at home and throwing in booze and weed for viewings make it a great way to view movies…. BUT.

There is NOTHING I love more than randomly on a weeknight opening my phone, seeing what playing in the multiplex down the street (I live in Downton Vancouver) and just walk down and see something random.

I get the same seat - right behind wheelchair so there’s a bar to put my feet up on. I grab an over priced Coke Zero, and watch whatever on the biggest screen possible.

And then I get to walk home through the city and reflect.

So yeah, I want the theatres to stay… I like both viewing experiences - and sometimes the theater way more cuz it FORCES me to stay (mostly, rather than just pausing when bored and finding something else)

Also, it’s easier to choose from 6 movies than 1000’s… I don’t spend hours hunting and then just rewatching Succession again.

I really hope Indy stays in long enough that I can to take my dad to it… but the flash is already slated for home release so I’m doubtful….
Hoping that you heal up and recover quickly! That's gotta stink. :(
 
I just have to ask this…did Disney kill this level of fandom? NO ONE gets THIS excited about Lucasfilm movies, anymore…


…no one waits in long lines…no one camps out for opening day….there just seems to be zero real excitement for anything Lucasfilm produces, anymore.

Well…except for this guy…

IMG_9688.png


The overall excitement just seems to be gone.
 
Last edited:
I just have to ask this…did Disney kill this level of fandom? NO ONE gets THIS excited about Lucasfilm movies, anymore…


…no one waits in long lines…no one camps out for opening day….there just seems to be zero real excitement for anything Lucasfilm produces, anymore.

Well…except for this guy…

View attachment 1716311

The overall excitement just seems to be gone.
I never got that excited about anything. I never stood in a line overnight to see a movie. The number of movies I've ever stood in a line for, it's never been for more than an hour becuase I just never cared. A movie is a movie. I might really be looking forward to it, but my time is worth more than that. I think the only movie I ever really saw a lot up front was Temple of Doom. I was at Mann's Chinese for the premiere, then the next morning, some friends and I saw it at the 10am showing. We took the day off school to do it. Then, another friend called me later on in the day and asked if I wanted to see the 7pm showing. He already had tickets. I went. Someone else wanted to see it on Sunday. I went with them too. That was about as far as I've ever gotten. I have never dressed up to go to a movie. I didn't go hauling around light sabers to see Star Wars. I'm not against people who want to, but it's never been for me. Since 2007, I haven't stepped foot in a theater and don't really care to ever again. I just don't care about the experience anymore. It's got more downsides than upsides for me. I don't know, maybe I just don't get it. I've just never been a fanatic about anything.
 
The second Phoebe Waller-Bridge was attached to Dial of Destiny, there was a very vocal and very angry group of fans who decided to hate the film just for that bit of casting. Without a scrap of evidence to support themselves, they claimed the film was going to be "woke" and that the purpose of Waller-Bridge was to literally erase Indy. And even now, many of those same voices are all backpedaling and saying they were right all along, and the director and cast are all lying and really did reshoot the film - again, without a scrap of evidence to support it. But hey, it gets them clicks.

I think the casting of PWB qualifies as evidence that there will be a character like the ones PWB usually plays & writes. It's not guaranteed but it was a reasonable thing for fans to assume.

When a movie casts Harrison Ford, you don't expect him to play a wimpy evil wisecracking villian. Ford usually gets hired to play a certain type of character. Same with most famous actors.
 
Back
Top