Horizontal lines was probably not the most flattering choice.
If this was just a sequel and not a reboot, my entire perspective on it would be reversed for the better.
If this was just a sequel and not a reboot, my entire perspective on it would be reversed for the better.
So, is it the general consensus, that if this movie's story had the exact same director, exact same cast, exact same design, & exact same history at the studio, but was taking place 30 years later in a franchise branch set in another city, then most of the detractors would be on board?
:confused
As far as the sequel vs. reboot thing, I still say that we got a direct sequel, using the same actors, director, & creative team, & it wasn't that good.
So, is it the general consensus, that if this movie's story had the exact same director, exact same cast, exact same design, & exact same history at the studio, but was taking place 30 years later in a franchise branch set in another city, then most of the detractors would be on board? .
at least until the actual MOVIE came out. if it still sucked, we'd be all over it. if it where good, it'd be easier to admit it. but as a reboot, that totally ditches everything yet copies everything else badly....I can't. that would mean some terrible executive is patting themselves on the back for their grand girl idea and that I can't condone.
at least until the actual MOVIE came out. if it still sucked, we'd be all over it. if it where good, it'd be easier to admit it. but as a reboot, that totally ditches everything yet copies everything else badly....I can't. that would mean some terrible executive is patting themselves on the back for their grand girl idea and that I can't condone.