Found! Obi-Wan Kenobi ANH Lightsaber Emitter

Originally posted by Gigatron@Oct 1 2005, 06:44 PM
Whoever had the contact that confirmed the interconnector may be able to get a pic of the impeller driveshaft gear/spline (wherever it connects to the wheelcase).
-Fred
[snapback]1088134[/snapback]​
One of those contacts will be looking at a picture of the gear as soon as he gets to work this week. :)
 
Well, you've insulted me, but thats cool.

Having a father in the Army for over 20 years who flew helicopters in Vietman, was an instructor in the Flight School, and a battalion leader of a Tank Division (Hell on Wheels), and was on the test committe for the Apache Helecopter prior to the Army purchasing it, I know a little about the Military process growing up as an Army Brat. I've been on more Army bases then I can remember.

With most engines and aircraft, replacement parts come in the caseload for repair and maintance and parts are not in short supply when a branch of Military is using a certain piece of equipment for active duty. Granted we are talking about much older aircraft, but you could probably find surplus parts for F-4 Phantoms if you went looking around and made some good contacts. Reading earlier in this Thread, this engine seems to have been used in several aircraft in several countries, I bet parts are easier to find then you would think. I'm not saying it would be a cake-walk, but I doubt there are absolutly no parts available for this engine anywhere in the world except on the engines themselves.


Originally posted by Prop Runner+Oct 1 2005, 04:23 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Prop Runner @ Oct 1 2005, 04:23 AM)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-James Kenobi 1138
@Oct 1 2005, 07:17 AM
If it turns out this is the part, and we can find an aircraft supplier who carries it, maybe we could put together a bulk order for everyone interested.  I'm sure like cars there has to be someone who makes replacement parts for maintance and rebuilds and such, and parts made to OEM standarts.  Something like a jet engine would require exact duplicate parts for repairs I would imagine.
[snapback]1087752[/snapback]​
James,

We're talking about a 60 year old engine made for planes that haven't flown in nearly 40, except for a handful at museums, and those most likely have original or custom rebuilt parts in their engines. Don't expect to find MOPAR dealers for a Dewert Mk. 8 - I just don't think there's much demand... ;) Having said that, it is possible Rolce Royce contracts with aerospace-grade machine shops to provide non-stock replacement parts for vintage engines. Hopefully our RR contact can shed more light on this angle.

The problem is, if you knew what high-grade materials and ridiculous machining tolerances are used in the manufacture of aerospace parts, you wouldn't have posted to begin with, lol. If RR blueprints of an interconnector can be found, or if an interconnector in good condition can be put to calipers and reverse-engineered, any machine shop could knock these out. And remember you'd still need some sort of spacer/adapter ring to connect it to the grenade.

- Gabe
[snapback]1087786[/snapback]​
[/b]
 
James, I think you and Gabe have perhaps misunderstood each other. Gabe's saying that newmade aeronautical parts would be expensive, and he's right.

It's now clear that what you're talking about is parts held by the military, which would now, if available to us at all, be pretty much scrap or surplus, not 'new'. That is a direction we hope will turn something up for us, but I get the impression these interchanges were not particularly prone to being replaced.

The guy I talked to who flew one of these for years as a hobby said he never had need of parts for it and had no specific ideas about where to go for them.

But he did give me a lead which Chris T. is already working on.
 
James,

Why do you feel insulted - because I disagree with something you said? Come on... I wasn't mocking you or your father's distinguished service record and I have no clue why you even brought him up, but like you said - it's cool. :)

Again, the RAF and the clients Britain sold Meteors and spare parts to over the years never had anywhere near the astronomical maintenance and inventory budgets the Pentagon has for our armed forces, and even if at one time there were warehouses full of Dewert parts and boxes of interconnectors stacked to the ceiling in Britain, those would have been auctioned off as surplus or sold for scrap metal decades ago.

As a man who knows the military intimately, you don't need me to tell you how expensive military equipment is. I've designed parts to military and aerospace specs and let me tell you - I could retire on the budget for just one of the small aircraft fuel pump redesign government contracts I once participated in... The amounts of money military and aerospace spec. hardware costs are insane, but then again: you get what you pay for.

I still maintain that our best bet is to find one or two original parts in good condition and reverse engineer them, just as we're trying to do with the newly discovered Han Solo ANH blaster suppressor. Our second best bet is to get our hands on the last known released drawings of our elusive interconnector parts and have new ones CNC machined as a bulk order. If Rolce Royce keeps a meticulous blueprint archive, it could be payday.

Good luck to everybody in their quests. :)

- Gabe
 
Originally posted by Serafino+Oct 2 2005, 03:20 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Serafino @ Oct 2 2005, 03:20 AM)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-Gigatron
@Oct 1 2005, 06:44 PM
Whoever had the contact that confirmed the interconnector may be able to get a pic of the impeller driveshaft gear/spline (wherever it connects to the wheelcase).
-Fred
[snapback]1088134[/snapback]​
One of those contacts will be looking at a picture of the gear as soon as he gets to work this week. :)
[snapback]1088157[/snapback]​
[/b]


That is damn fine news - damn fine news indeed :D.

James, I wouldn't take it as an offense. PR (or the rest of us) would have no idea you grew up around military installations. We would assume that you're just a regular joe who may be under the presumption that the collector/restoration market for the derwent was something along the lines of the market of car restorers. Yes, granted the military does order stuff like that in bulk, but I would think it would be of parts that tend to go funny, i.e. the igniters, canopies (bird strikes), landing gear tires, engine parts that actually move. Our little friend is a pass tube, does nothing but sit there day in and day out.

Anyway, back to the search :D..

-Fred
 
Here are 2 more high res pics of a derwent 8. They don't really show much in terms of what we're looking for but they give you an idea of where everything goes

[attachmentid=4890]

[attachmentid=4891]


You'll notice in the top pic, you can see most of the gears (towards the right). Unfortunately, the pic is taken from the wrong angle. We need a pic taken INTO the wheelcase so we can see the splined end of the drive shaft.

Feel free to nitpick your way through the pics to see if you can see anything. I have much larger pics on my machine. If you'd like though, go to www.enginehistory.org and do a search for derwent. You'll find these pics and more (though nothing we haven't seen - unless someone misnamed them)
-Fred
 
I have an important question.

If we were to ask someone at Rolls Royce or at an aircraft museum etc where we could get parts for the Derwent and they asked why we wanted them, what would be the best answer?
 
Originally posted by kurtyboy@Oct 3 2005, 03:19 PM
I have an important question.

If we were to ask someone at Rolls Royce or at an aircraft museum etc where we could get parts for the Derwent and they asked why we wanted them, what would be the best answer?
[snapback]1088922[/snapback]​


Well, there are a few ways you could go with this:

1) tell them you're interested in turbine engines, specifically derwent, and while you've seen the piece mentioned in print, there are no pictures of the item available (and lord knows it's the truth)

2) you're working on a resto or school project, but be careful, if they start questioning you about the engine, you better be somwhat familiar with the terms and inner workings

and 3) (and probably the way I would go) tell them you think the piece in question may have been very instrumental in star wars (I'm sure they heard of it) and you need the piece to verify your findings. Even if they only let you photograph and measure it (maybe they're hard to come by), it'll be better than nothing at all.

But that's me, maybe someone here has a better way.

-Fred
 
I'm tending towards being honest, I like the argument for it posted above. But the more 'official' the first contact, the more likely I am not to mention it at first. An engineer I can see having interest in our quest. Bureaucrats are notoriously unimaginative, on the other hand. :)
 
I wouldnt mention Star Wars personally... :confused

But there wouldnt be anything wrong with saying you are trying to ID a part used in a movie IMHO..... :angel

Jim
 
Originally posted by Lordsandy+Oct 3 2005, 08:57 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Lordsandy @ Oct 3 2005, 08:57 AM)</div>
I wouldnt mention Star Wars personally... :confused

But there wouldnt be anything wrong with saying you are trying to ID a part used in a movie IMHO..... :angel
Jim
[snapback]1088975[/snapback]​
[/b]
That's the way I thought about it originally, but I find Gabe's ideas about this very persuasive, and I'd rather be honest given a reasonable chance it won't amount to shooting myself in the foot:

Originally posted by Prop Runner@Sep 29 2005, 12:49 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Serafino
@Sep 29 2005, 08:29 PM
Gabe, what kind of experience have you had with the results of being up front about what we want a part for?

In some arenas it hasn't been helpful, but perhaps I am being overly cautious in avoiding the subject in this case.  It would be fun to let people in on our excitement actually, while acting suitably embarassed at being so geeky.  ;)
[snapback]1086639[/snapback]​

Keep in mind that collectors and preservationists like us are kindered spirits - we will probably geek out over each other's stuff and have a healthy respect for each other's passions. I'm counting on that when I correspond with a source. In the past, it helped me get proprietary 1:1 scale drawings of the Hellboy Samaritan from the conceptual artist who designed it for the film, as well as 10 signed & numbered Blade Runner origami chickens from the British paper folder whose hands were actually seen in the movie posing it on Captain Bryant's table (Ridley Scott cut out the scene in which his hands were actually shown folding it out of a crumpled cigarette box liner he picked out of an ashtray). He sent me 10 origami reproductions all the way from the UK to California for free, because he respected our passion for his work.

I suggest that a courtious and honest, yet restrained approach will make the Dewert and Meteor sources "friendly to our cause." And since they're all aviation buffs to begin with, it's not a stretch to think that they love sci-fi too. :)

[snapback]1086659[/snapback]​
 
I agree, be honest. You don't have to offer excess info unless requested. You could simply say it's for a film prop you're trying to build and don't offer details unless requested. There are lots of SW fans out there, maybe some closet geek unknowingly is sitting on the part we've been looking for for years and would be thrilled to assist.

I helped Prop Replicator get info on The Prisoner phone by contacting some British phone collectors. The guy asked what my interest was, and I told him, including giving the RPF's addy. He checked us out and thought we were all pretty cool.
 
No sure if this was posted or not, but this letter make me think that some parts could still be in supply.

Safety Regulation GroupApplications and Certification Section
4 March 2003
Our Ref 9/97/CtAw/CtAw/261
LETTER TO OWNERS/OPERATORS NO 2420 ROLLS-ROYCE DERWENT MK 8 AND MK 9 ENGINES FITTED TO GLOSTER METEOR AIRCRAFT ENGINE CRITICAL PARTS CYCLIC LIFE

It is recognised that there are Gloster Meteor aircraft powered by Rolls-Royce Derwent Mk 8 and Mk 9 engines operating privately on the UK register. Derwent engines do not have formally defined critical parts as modern engines would.Those parts that are considered to be critical are the impeller, the turbine disc and the turbine shaft. It is known nowadays that failure of these parts is caused by metal fatigue,which is driven by cyclic usage. A failure of these parts could lead to uncontained enginedebris with high release energy. There was no cyclic life control applied to these criticalparts as the inspection of these components for evidence of cracks were carried outfrequently at overhaul or during hot end change. Thus, the inspection interval for these critical parts would have been up to 450 hours for the turbine disc and up to 900 hours for the impeller and shaft sections, the number of cycles accumulated would have been very small. Rolls-Royce undertook recently extensive lifing studies on the turbine disc, turbine shaftand impeller to derive cyclic lives. Because the last inspection of some engines is up to 40years ago and that inspection standards were very rudimentary at that time (the impellerwould have been inspected using red dye, which could not guarantee to reveal a crack ofless than 0.2” long), no realistic safe life can be derived for any of these components. With the lack of information of the internal condition of the engine, the operator should bealerted of the high risk of failure if the critical components have not been subjected to ahigh sensitivity crack inspection. It is important that the usage of the engine critical parts (impeller, turbine disc and turbine shaft) is appropriately recorded in order to minimise the risk of a hazardous failure. An assessment of the cyclic exchange rate for typical mission profiles enables cyclic usage to be related to flight hours. Rolls-Royce have carried out this assessment for Derwent engines, which indicates that the rate of cycles per engine hour may be greater in privateoperation than originally expected in a typical military operation. The private operators should take steps to ensure that the aircraft would be flown in a benign regime. WhilstRolls-Royce cannot advise on any cyclic exchange rate applicable to private operations, it will consider calculating the exchange rate for a selection of mission profiles. continued overleaf Civil Aviation AuthorityFloor 1E Aviation House Gatwick Airport South West Sussex England RH6 0YR Phone +44 (0) 1293 573149 Fax +44 (0) 1293 573993
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
In order to advise on an appropriate cyclic exchange rate applicable to private operations,the operator should provide the CAA Propulsion Department with a profile data in a form ofcomplete engine RPM versus Time for each flight profile. This profile data should beunderwritten by an approved BCAR A8-20 (E4) organisation. Additionally, the few Derwent engines both installed and spares for the Gloster Meteoraircraft may be over 40 years old and due to concerns about the adverse effect ofcorrosion on the critical parts and concerns for the integrity of elastomers, Rolls-Roycerecommends that a 15 year calendar life be imposed after which an appropriate overhaul should be carried out. The CAA is currently reviewing with Rolls-Royce maintenance instructions for inspection of these critical parts to determine appropriate safe cyclic lives for continued operation. Enquiries regarding this LTO should be referred to Mr C Denis, Propulsion Department (Telephone No 01293 573641) at the address shown. R J TEW Airworthiness Directive Co-ordinator

I found this letter here
http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?category...=90&pageid=2629.
 
That letter pops up every time I look for parts. I've seen it so many times I can almost quote it verbatim :lol.

While it doesn't give any real hope as to finding the interconnector, it does however, give me some about the gear. If the gear is indeed part of the impeller drive shaft, then it is feasible that there are replacements being made.

If we could track down a driveshaft in its entirety, we could really put that theory to rest one way or another. If the gear is indeed cut down from a larger section as Serafino has deduced, then getting a good look at this thing would give us diameter and tooth count.

-Fred
 
I asked my father in law about some of these parts...he was a Mechanic for United Airlines for 30 years...
He was knowledgeable about jet engines in general though not specificly the Derwent...
Apparently RR made engines for many airplanes, not the same engines of course...but the principals are the same.

Yes the interconnector is part of the cooling system but he didn't recognize it specificly...

But the most interesting piece of info I got was about the gear...
I showed him the drawing showing the female pattern that we believe to be close, and said to him...we are trying to find the piece that goes into there...
He said that would be the speedometer (engine speed or whatever it's called on a plane) hookup linkage thing (I'm trying to remember all the tech names he told me).

So, look toward the speedometer for our gear perhaps :)
 
Originally posted by Sporak@Oct 3 2005, 12:50 PM
Yes the interconnector is part of the cooling system but he didn't recognize it specificly...
[snapback]1089123[/snapback]​
But it's not part of the cooling system, it's part of the ignition system. :)
 
Originally posted by Sporak@Oct 3 2005, 08:50 PM
But the most interesting piece of info I got was about the gear...
I showed him the drawing showing the female pattern that we believe to be close, and said to him...we are trying to find the piece that goes into there...
He said that would be the speedometer (engine speed or whatever it's called on a plane) hookup linkage thing (I'm trying to remember all the tech names he told me).

So, look toward the speedometer for our gear perhaps :)
[snapback]1089123[/snapback]​

Unfortunately, while we don't know where the gear actually comes from (it's all speculation at this point), we do know the pic that you showed him was of the impeller drive shaft, essentially the axle of the engine. It connects the starter and "transmission" unit (wheelcase) to the actual jet. Without the shaft, the starter drive would spin, but the engine would be dead as there was nothing connecting the two.

Here's a highlighted pic to show what I'm talking about:
[attachmentid=4892]

The red is the driveshaft, the blue box is where we expect to find the gear. You'll see gears in that box, don't get excited. Those are the gears that mesh our female drive receptacle to the breather plate (see post #184 for a better visualisation)

hope this clears a little bit up.

-Fred
 
Originally posted by ytt1300@Oct 3 2005, 10:48 PM
http://www.corestore.org/scrap.htm 

is anyone close to this place, might be worth a look?

-Kevin

[googled derwent, surplus]
[snapback]1089188[/snapback]​


We need to get to this place, J. E. Williamson, Elgin. All they have are old derwent runway cleaners? As in derwent MK.8s sitting on stands waiting to picked clean of all 18 per engine Obi emitters? If we ever needed the help of a british member, this was the time.

-Fred
 
That place has GOT to be investigated.

They had a few Derwents sitting there in 1999. Hopefully they're still there.
Also remember 9 IG-88 heads per engine too.

I think I found the address and phone number, but rather than post it right now I am forwarding to an RPFer who I believe is in the area.
At this point we just need someone to call and confirm if they are there and then go an investigate if they are.

Please don't everyone swamp them with phone calls etc.
 
This thread is more than 18 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top