FWIW, if you recall in 2009 just about every screening of Avatar had the 3D at double the ticket price. Most screenings of Endgame today aren’t IMAX. So that’s a false equivalence. But that’s beside the point.I just don't see it as quite as meaningful if you edge out titanic (which, admittedly it will eventually leave in the dust) which was out 20 years ago. Avatar may have 3D to boost it but it was what? 15 years ago? There's now IMAX at a higher rate as a 'boost' still.
I'd like to see endgame get to the top, but, but say it finishes at 2.9. It's a great achivement, but i'd say avatar's was a bit better.
Whether justified or not, Avatar and Titanic have been lauded as supreme box-office champions only if you don’t apply those qualifiers that would have GWTW at #1. If Endgame beats Avatar it would be using the same metric that would have Avatar beating GWTW. If Avatar is an “achievement” then, by the same standard, so is Endgame.
(On a personal note that doesn’t change the fact that Avatar is a fiery load of steatorrhea.)
Last edited: