JMSupp
Well-Known Member
"Oh, that's the rib on the OTHER side... where it broke, and was repaired." - Anonymous expert #3, probably.How do the "experts" explain this?
View attachment 1477684
The bottom photo is of course the HA phaser
"Oh, that's the rib on the OTHER side... where it broke, and was repaired." - Anonymous expert #3, probably.How do the "experts" explain this?
View attachment 1477684
The bottom photo is of course the HA phaser
They don't. Just like they don't explain the lack of a screen match or the construction of the P1.How do the "experts" explain this?
View attachment 1477684
The bottom photo is of course the HA phaser
If any "secret" or undisclosed information supported the premise that the phaser is authentic, and production made, I could see a case for releasing it for PR purposes. If it just creates more questions, rather then answering any, would that really help them?Specifically, I do not expect them to take an active roll on this forum, or any other. I expect them to be aware of the evidence presented between the hand wringing and comic foil posts - the reason I would like to see a condensation of just the facts, to memorialize the case made. It is very hard to refute this evidence, but if it is such a sure thing, with the so called "secret' information, now that the auction is passed, but the controversy is not, it is the time to address it on their own terms. They have many tools at their disposal to deal with it.
I do expect silence, but I think that will come, at a cost.
They don't. Just like they don't explain the lack of a screen match or the construction of the P1.
It's entirely possible that this prop, even with its eccentricities, is real. So far, none of the experts has told us why they made their determination despite all the contradictory physical & historical evidence.
Sort of. He invented a Wah scenario that sort of explained the history of the P1 & P2 but contradicted the LOAs. Earlier in the thread he had evidence that the P2 was one of his or, at least, a modern replica.Before he was banned... again - did Ron Shenko state the consignors were Wah's family?
That’s not something I considered. Hmmmm.The kindest read I have for that is what I said earlier: A clique of aficionados got excited & talked each other into buying a phaser that’s probably going to turn out to be a fake.
Good one!What if, a bunch of people that had never heard of "GONE WITH THE WIND" examined the book? They might say, "Look at all the things that are RIGHT about the time, and culture, and events of the civil war....isn't it likely that Gone with the Wind is.....NON-fiction?"
They'd still be dead wrong, if they didn't involve people in the discussion that KNOW that Gone with the Wind is a work of FICTION. Only talking amongst themselves and not getting outside input could make them make a mistake in identification.
Good one!