Wonder Woman 1984

Steve may be a great pilot, but beyond the plane being 'ready to fly' and the realities of flying it across the Atlantic, no WWI pilot is going to hop in a modern aircraft and start the engines, much less fly it anywhere.

Exactly! I meant to mention that but left it out... also...
What about the COMPLETE lack of concern for the man who's body Steve jumped into? Maybe he had a family. Maybe some people that cared about him looking for him after his body was taken over? And not to get too serious, but basically, she had sex with a man who didn't have control over his own body or functions. Pretty unethical for a superhero, even if her back from the dead boyfriend is occupying his body. Isn't that basically.... you know, rape?
 
Exactly! I meant to mention that but left it out... also...
What about the COMPLETE lack of concern for the man who's body Steve jumped into? Maybe he had a family. Maybe some people that cared about him looking for him after his body was taken over? And not to get too serious, but basically, she had sex with a man who didn't have control over his own body or functions. Pretty unethical for a superhero, even if her back from the dead boyfriend is occupying his body. Isn't that basically.... you know, rape?
Considering all the other stuff that happened "out of thin air", that particular wrinkle was completely unnecessary, and it really felt wrong for Diana to just accept it.
 
I'm disappointed in Wonder Woman 1984. I knew it would be hard to top the first movie, but this movie felt messy to me. There were a lot of elements which were just plain confusing - Steve's return, and the rules of wishing, especially. I felt like the backstory/motivations for Max Lord were weak.
Considering all the other stuff that happened "out of thin air", that particular wrinkle was completely unnecessary, and it really felt wrong for Diana to just accept it.
I agree, especially with so much of this movie hinging on personal choices and how they affect other people's lives.

Another thing that bothered me was the scene on the street at night after Barbara was being harassed and Diana just leaves her there. She's had a super scary encounter alone, in the dark, and Diana doesn't even offer to walk her home or anything?

Loved the gold armor and mid credits scene though.
 
Welcome to my world! So often I will see a trailer for something that I by all accounts should be crapping my pants over and yet I feel nothing.

I enjoyed the first movie even though it was too long and the villain was goofy. As far as this trailer goes, I love the Blue Monday remix and how it was edited to the trailer. Though by all accounts movies and TV shows seem to think that song was the only hit from the era. How about a little Depeche Mode??? The movie itself looks fun. Part of me sees all the marketing ploys being used to suck me in, but the other part of me would totally be down to see it. I feel split right down the middle.

The shot with her "riding the lightning" looks so over the top schlock that I could in fact love it for being so goofy. It does resemble Spiderman. The truck flipping end over end is right out of the Dark Knight. The White house sequence right out of X2. Maybe it's the recycling of shots from other movies that is annoying me. Kristen Wiig will basically be Electro from Amazing Spiderman 2. Dorky friend who is enamored with her to begin with then turned villain when she feels snubbed by Diana. That shot from inside the coliseum is a mix between Gladiator and Batman begins with the kids running on those posts. The street shot with Capital Hill in the background is from The Quest for Peace and The Search for Spock. The 1984 title card is from GLOW. The vibrant color palate is likely from Ragnarok. The mall is from Stranger Things. Steve's return is Captain America being thawed out and playing his fish out of water in the modern world trope for laughs. As long as the story isn't just a mashup of other movies and the script had something fresh to give us, it could be a lot of fun.

Do I kind of love/hate this obsession with the retro 80s nostalgia? Yes. It's getting to the point where it's starting to be overused and I can see all the tropes from other movies being pulled in this trailer alone.

Either way I'll give it a chance. I was surprised by the chemistry between the two characters in the first movie and while I'm sure they will come up with some ridiculous reason to bring Steve back, other than the obvious one, then I'm on board.

The trash can bit did make me laugh.

It's always a balancing act that few movies, especially ones with passionate fan bases, tend to get right.

I think it looks fun and I want to see it. I don't have huge expectations. I just want to be entertained. I mean honestly parts of it could be super dumb but as long as it's fun I can have a good laugh. It could end up being a surprise too like the first and I ended up enjoying it more than I expected to.

What do you expect when you get nerds talking about a comic book movie on an internet discussion forum? Of course we will debate the validity of the set dressings, especially when it's a forum dedicated to props! ;)

Honestly I'm not really feeling this new trailer. The first trailer had me pretty split because I could see the copy and paste job from other movies and shows used to make the trailer. I love Kristen Wiig but her CGI Cheetah looks terrible. If you want to see what an incredible actress she is, check out Skeleton Twins, or Welcome to Me. Both great movies I highly recommend, especially Skeleton Twins.

As for Wonder Woman, I find Gal Gadot's "modeling" poses kind of annoying in this new trailer, but I really did enjoy that first movie. I hope this one can pull it off and I'm totally wrong about having mixed feelings on the trailer. We shall see.

I agree with this sentiment, except for the part I made bold. I'm all for internal story logic. If you establish a certain idea in the story it has to remain consistent to keep from being jarring, and if there is a need to change it, it better not disrupt the story (or theme) too far off course. But I do at least like a story to make some logical sense, even within it's own universe. Like if you're going to throw away any sense of peril for a character I can't even remotely take it seriously. That's a deal breaker for me.

Just my 2 pennies worth.


Normally I wouldn't quote myself but for the sake of brevity and backing up earlier statements I have to say this movie was a disappointment. It played out beat for beat mostly how I expected as a mix tape version of every trope I described in my trailer breakdown.

The motivations for the characters felt forced and it was so over the top that I had a hard time getting invested in any of it. I'm starting to tire of this technicolor retro look of the 1980's and all the cliches it entails. While there were questionable fashion choices in one of my favorite decades, it often gets amped up to the point of absurdity for movies and shows (my biggest gripe with season 3 of Stranger Things) to the point where it becomes too self aware and distracting, pulling me right out of the story. Colors were never that vibrant, even with my rose tinted glasses on.

Gal Gadot surprised me in this and she's becoming a better actress despite being saddled with a mediocre script. Her sincerity in the first film really came through and endeared me to her character enough to win me over and unabashedly become a fan of the movie. Sure the villain was corny and the final showdown felt like a video game, but it had heart and I felt genuinely thrilled to see her in action because by that point in the story she felt like a real person who I cared about and that humanity and love for others is what carried the movie.

The thing that also sold me on the first Wonder Woman was that there was a real sense of peril. Despite being fictional, Patty Jenkins did a great job balancing the heroics of a comic book film with the visceral realities of a historical war that shaped the world. That was one of key elements that set it apart from other superhero films because it brilliantly mirrored actual history and framed Diana's journey as a means to explore issues of the day and one that was sorely missed in this movie. It could have been a great commentary on the decadence of the 1980's. My wife keenly observed even how something subtle like Diana's fashion choices being more conservative than the pomp of the times and to my mind it sold us on the idea that she wasn't concerned with the excess of the age. Had this idea been explored better it would have been a thematic triumph like the first film's use of the suffrage movement. Wonder Woman's success was it's positive message and this sequel sorely lacked one.

Her chemistry with Chris Pine was one of the strengths of the first outing and it's still present here, even if the circumstances of their reunion was superficially tied to the plot. It makes me wonder if they'll be brave enough to have another possible love interest in the third installment. Though I'm guessing her interaction with the man who inhabited Steve's soul is a likely sign that she'll move on with her life without him. My wife was surprised that the guy didn't at least ask for her number, and I was thinking they would have gone on a date at the least.

The main issue I had with it was the lack of theme and no real sense of danger, like ever. It felt all over the place and muddled by plot points and character motivations that really had little to do with Diana's journey as a character. It also set up rules that it violated within it's own movie. Often a criticism I have of franchise films is that they contradict rules made in previous installments, but when they play fast and loose with them in a single movie it becomes frustrating. I also never once felt as though Diana or any of the characters could die. I know being the protagonist she wouldn't, but even though they showed her bleed, I never felt she could be truly hurt. We all know the protagonist in these films never dies, but at the least we need to feel at some low point they could.

I liked the golden armor and the Linda Carter cameo was a nice nod to the history of the character, though my wife pointed out immediately that she should have had vibrant green eyes like in the flashback sequence. This is but another small example of how continuity within a film is super important. Had this been the only instance I think the both of us would have happily overlooked it, but considering all the other missteps, it was hard to ignore.

All in all I would take Wonder Woman over Wonder Woman 1984 any day. In fact it makes me want to revisit the original to get this one out of my head.
 
Last edited:
I loved the first one but was let down a bit by this one. It seemed very rushed at the end.

How did she know just stating to take her wish back would work? You even here Steve after he's out of sight saying he will always love her...which seemed more "I'm still here, that didn't work".

Totally guessed who the other warrior was and appreciated the mid credits that had nothing to do with another movie outside of the story here. Also noticed the difference in eyes because I was like Lynda has blue eyes though during the flashback scene.
 
Last edited:
Watched it on HBO Max....wife got up and left about 30 minutes into it. We loved the first WW movie but this was a mess. We were looking forward to a smart girl power flick like the original and was hoping that they woldnt go for the low hanging fruit, but they did. Every guy with a speaking role was either blathering idiot, an abuser, sexual predator, a bum, a terrorist, a creep or a slob.
 
Found it to be quite enjoyable. Just not enough 80s music for me, and would have preferred it if Minerva kept her human form and just wore a leopard (cheetah) skin stuff - I know it's Marvel but Spidy doesn't look like a spider, ant man doesn't look like a frigging ant.
 
That was another that made no sense, among others, in that she was transformed into a Cheetah, why? So the movie can happen.... They never established her fascination with felines or anything. At the least a line about it or having a cat at home or studied in Africa and having seen their strength first hand etc would have given more credence to her wanting to become one. Idk.

The first movie so deftly made Diana a force to be reconned with and she did it by having convictions so strong she was willing to die for them, so for all of her powers and strength, it's her belief in goodness that makes her such an icon among the greatest heroes. I just felt the first movie really beautifully accomplished this with its narrative far better than 1984 did.
 
I loved the first one but was let down a bit by this one. It seemed very rushed at the end.

How did she know just stating to take her wish back would work? You even here Steve after he's out of sight saying he will always love her...which seemed more "I'm still here, that didn't work".

Totally guessed who the other warrior was and appreciated the mid credits that had nothing to do with another movie outside of the story here. Also noticed the difference in eyes because I was like Lynda has blue eyes though during the flashback scene.

Steve said he’d always love her before she actually said she renounced her wish. The moment she said she renounced her wish you could see her wounds heal.
 
Well, only waiting 1h and a half for some Wonder Woman action and be like “wait can she do that?”

Also am I the only one being triggered by the fact that her golden armour squishes against the wall at the end when she’s sitting down? Like is it not the point to believe it is not made from Eva foam?:lol:
 
I thought it was okay. I definitely thought the first movie was the better of the two. I actually like the vibrant colors of the 80s in movie despite actually being like that in real life.

Well, only waiting 1h and a half for some Wonder Woman action and be like “wait can she do that?”

Also am I the only one being triggered by the fact that her golden armour squishes against the wall at the end when she’s sitting down? Like is it not the point to believe it is not made from Eva foam?:lol:

I was really distracted by the squishy armor at the end and if I noticed it then a ton of RPF’rs would too
 
An all-around forgettable movie.

Either the novel experience of seeing super-heroes on-screen is getting really dull and bland, or this movie was just dull and bland.

There was no sense of peril, or suspense. You knew that the Quantum Leap version of Captain Kirk was not going to be around, again, at the end. You also knew that The Mandalorian’s shenanigans would be reversed.

And about that plane....strange that it would be gassed up and ready to go.

Even more amazing that a WWI bi-plane pilot would be able to immediately fly it.

I suppose one could immediately jump from this...

FF21D546-6E08-44F9-BDAA-7218EE6FC59C.jpeg


...to this:

B4016A99-2A9C-4AE2-BBDF-3DC245A915B0.jpeg


Or, from this...

C64B6F00-74BD-4077-B815-E6F924E47FA7.jpeg


...to this:

7C829B70-C1BB-4C71-8D83-187DD81B26E4.jpeg


Yes, totally believable. They all have gauges, some sort of “control stick”, run on fuel, and have wings.

I also hate to admit that the current obsession with 1980’s nostalgia has worn out its welcome, with me. Yes, the 1980’s were long enough ago that we can look back at those years with the misty-eyed lenses of nostalgia, but we are starting to spend too much time looking back there, now.

Good luck with your next season, Stranger Things...

I’m ready to move into the 1990’s and to giggle at excessively pleated pants, hyper-colored clothing, fly-catcher hair styles, and the transcendent sounds of Vanilla Ice.

Holy hilarity; it’s true, it’s all true. Just look at how lame we were in 1991:

51FCE2A5-B594-4A6F-A582-0BA0382188BF.jpeg
 
Last edited:
...besides (I've only seen the trailer) the aircraft shown is an Panavia Tornado - no version with pilots sitting side by side possible...

I didn't want to get that technical (I drive my wife crazy with observations about these kinds of incosistencies), but yes... another in a long list of "WTF?" moments. Again, there are a couple aircraft they could have used for that, but they didn't.
 
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed too, I really enjoyed the first one, but I'm not sure I like the cheesier approach here. There were some good moments, there is heart, but I didn't find any scenes as powerful as the trench scene un the first one by example. That said I'm down for a third try, with Gadot, she made this role her own and it fits like a glove. Mini-Diana did good work too at the beginning I have to say. And if the third involves Carter, well then all the more reasons to wait for it!
 
...besides (I've only seen the trailer) the aircraft shown is an Panavia Tornado - no version with pilots sitting side by side possible...

The jet they got in clearly had side by side seats. You could see them next to each other in the cockpit as they’re walking up to it, and as it’s pulling away there’s an exterior shot with them sitting side by side.

So it’s either not a Tornado...or they built an entire replica of a Tornado with side by side seats.

Sorry for the crappy pics...the app won’t let me get screen grabs.
7049B0DD-678B-4D4B-B173-47A57783B6E4.jpeg

1DE64F84-1DF5-42C8-B676-77E0B47E7635.jpeg

25B3CE6B-F63C-41B7-AD6A-E313A9B54AF1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
It IS a Panavia Tornado with a digital altert cockpit-segment... In reality no such a Tornado exists... It would be even too small for two seats side by side / such a cockpit...
I personal worked on Tornados for years in the German Airforce... They should have used a Grumman F111....
 
My biggest issues with the movie:
  1. The continued focus on Steve. I like Pine. I think he's a decent actor (certainly better than he typically gets credit for). I also think he and Gadot have really good chemistry... But Steve DIED. For Diana to still be pining over him (ha) some 70 years later feels reductive and is very frustrating.
  2. She brushes off the fact that his return robs another person of their bodily autonomy and straight up rapes some rando dude because the spirit of her dead boyfriend has possessed him.
  3. 70ish years and Diana didn't figure out on her own that she can fly?! No, it took Steve explaining how flying feels to him for her to try.
  4. I continue to be disappointed that no one involved with these movies wants to admit that Diana is, at the very least, bisexual and she almost certainly had relationships prior to Steve. Let's be honest. She is a healthy, athletic young woman on an island populated entirely by beautiful, healthy, athletic women. There was definitely sex going on.

The bottom line is I really only enjoyed this movie because my expectations were pretty low to begin with, and yet I was still disappointed in a fair amount of it. I'm not sure how much of the blame belongs with Jenkins and how much was studio interference/Geoff Johns' involvement, but yeah... In the end, they could have lopped a solid 30-45 minutes off this movie, had a much tighter story, and a better movie (though probably still disappointing because... see above).
 
The jet they got in clearly had side by side seats. You could see them next to each other in the cockpit as they’re walking up to it, and as it’s pulling away there’s an exterior shot with them sitting side by side.

So it’s either not a Tornado...or they built an entire replica of a Tornado with side by side seats.

Sorry for the crappy pics...the app won’t let me get screen grabs. View attachment 1382598
View attachment 1382599
View attachment 1382600


Its def a Toranado and as a commercial pilot....I was rolling my eyes. I usually dont pick apart airplane scenes in TV and Movies IE, people walk up to say a small LearJet and during the interior shots its huge inside like the Tardis. But WW84 just jumped the shark.

Firstly, they dont leave vintage planes fully fueled. Second, a plane like that would require some serious MX personnel to get it started. Thirdly, there is no side by side cockpit on a Toranado. Fourthly, even with my over 9k hours in jets, it would take me quite a while with a clear checklist to even get the engines started....let alone programming the avionics, sub systems and gettin gth edang thing off the ground. Where are we now....ah yes, Fifthly, the range on that thing is like 2,000 miles. So did they stop for fuel in Greenland and Israel?

The writer/director/producer is the daughter of a fighter pilot. SHE KNEW BETTER! Sorry for the caps but thats when you hire a technical exert for the day. Here is another plot hole/gap....how did the bad guy and WW get to the Middle East at the same time?

I have a bad feeling about her on board with The X-Wing flick. WW84 is what happens when you have one person with too much creative control. It might make sense in their head, but it leaves the general audience in the dust. At 2.5 hours this flick needed a trimming, some re-shoots and editing. Hopefully the folks at Marvel pull her in as part of the creative team, instead of her being the creative team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron
I really liked the first film.... This though lol is a giant,mindless,vapid,steaming pile of rediculous WOKE crap. The writing and directing is beyond a joke. Those responsible should be banned to high school plays.
I feel bad for Gal Gadot, she deserves better than this. That Wig female is pure box office poison, again what are they thinking!
This will crash and burn just like all the other films that partake in such nonsensical trends.... Good riddance hollywood.
 
Back
Top