Robbie TPC
Well-Known Member
Indiana Jones
.....and the
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
.....and the
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
And, you also get Temple of Doom, which some consider one of the best, which doesn't feature either of those. Besides, Raiders started off with Indy going after a non-Judeo-Christian artifact.
(1) Temple of Doom is considered the best of the trilogy by about 2% of the fans (okay, not an exact number, but it's BY FAR not a majority). Most people's reaction to Temple is "It's not great, but at least it's not Crystal Skull."
(2) The "other" artifacts Indy goes after in Raiders and Crusade aren't the main storyline. The MAIN story involves Judeo-Christian artifacts.
I'm not saying it would be impossible to create a good Indy around other artifacts (I would hope a good writer could do it), I'm just saying there seems to be a pattern (or maybe it's just the "odd number" Indy films are good...).
While I don't disagree with the decision to not use Nazis in the last film (given Ford's age and the progression of time), I don't agree with the reasoning and I don't think "The Russians" were a good idea either.
Indy needs a good antagonist and the Nazis served that purpose well. The Russians and Terrorist organizations just don't have the same effect. Without resorting to Space Aliens or Secret Organizations, we need to give Indy a foil - and I think a rival would fit that mold better (like in Raiders).
I didn't say, "the best." I said, "one of the best." If you're going to respond to a quote by me, I ask that you please make sure you and I are on the same page.
You may be true about the pattern, but Temple of Doom proved the exception before Crystal Skull came out. Also, most of the non-film Indiana Jones adventures had him going after a lot of other non-Judeo-Christian artifacts as well. Granted, you can argue that those adventures are non-canon, but they are still rather decent and prove the exception is possible.
Well, in the 1950s, it's either the Russians (which were active) or the Japanese (which at the time were still suspect and slightly hated because of what happened at Pearl Harbor), unless you're going with an individual or a secret group that Indy is facing.
What you're saying is true. Indy needs a good antagonist. But the problem with what you are saying is that you are confusing the antagonist with the henchmen. The Nazis were not the antagonists of Raiders. They were the henchmen, the expendable Stormtroopers of the Indiana Jones films. René Belloq was the antagonist. Yes, there was Arnold Ernst Toht, the Gestapo who was working with the Nazis, but he is still, basically, a second in command. In Last Crusade, Walter Donovan and the Nazis were the henchmen again with Vogel being the second in command. The same is true with Temple of Doom and Crystal Skull (in which the Thungees and the Russians are the henchmen, being lead by a leader who is the real antagonist of the films they are featured in).
What about Belloq's son. seeking revenge on Indy because he blames him for his fathers death? He could be collecting all the artifacts that his father "found" and he needs an especially tricky/dangerous/mystic one so he forces Indy to get for him. Send Mutt to college for about...forever and have Indy call upon one of his grad students to help him find it. If you get the right actor for Indy's helper you can, in a sense, reboot it with a new actor and NAME. Indiana Smith perhaps??
He should go after his IRA :lol
I wouldn't mind if he helped me find the $10 I lost on the last film
:lolI wouldn't mind if he helped me find the $10 I lost on the last film
How about if he goes after the Aztec Bloodstone, which exhibits the ability to control individuals whose blood comes in contact with it. The Russians have it and have procurred a blood sample from the front runner to the US Presidency.