I just re-watched AI a few weeks ago, I thought the robots actually offered the explanation of who they were to the kid (robot)? If not I "got" it I guess, because after watching it I knew the advanced "beings" were robots of the future studying their creators. Actually a pretty good flick, worth a rewatch every decade or so :lolWell that was my assumption, but they looked like robots to me.
:lol Just like the TV show!Saw The A-team (2010) the other day. The boat explosion with people climbing and running while containers are falling around them. Ridiculous.
If I had to choose Avatars I'd rather watch the bald kid againYou could have just said "Avatar" and I would have agreed with you. :lol
And his effort to negotiate a re-location? You'd have better luck leaving that in the hands of a middle schooler who's known for procrastinating on their homework.
Having been in the Army, I can't begin to list all the things wrong with that movie. There are so many issues with the laws of physics, how machines work and how the military works (the biggest is that people who are court martialled are not brought back to service and officers are never demoted, they just get booted out). That whole tank from a parachute thing almost made me leave the theater because even the TV show wouldn't have done something that idiotic...Saw The A-team (2010) the other day. The boat explosion with people climbing and running while containers are falling around them. Ridiculous.
Pretty much all of Torque, but if I have to narrow it down: Riding a motorcycle up a ramp of some kind, jumping onto the top of a moving train, and then riding around on top of the train. He might even have dropped down and ridden the bike through the train, but I've tried to block all this from memory, unsuccessfully.
"Flying Dom" in the latest Fast/Furious movie.
Anything in the Fast and Furious movies, mostily the car stunts. They're funt to watch, but they really mess with the laws of physics.
There is plenty of unrealistic stuff in the F&F movies. But people aren't always correct about which things they are.
Plenty of times I hear people scoff at a stunt being "so totally fake" when it was actually done for real. Or "Yeah right, like anyone in the car could survive that!" when in fact somebody did.
And stunt crews sometimes have to jump through hoops to make something work that the average person assumes would just work naturally. It's easy to just get a car hurling into the air. But getting it into the air with the launching method the story calls for, doing it in a predictable/repeatable pattern, and doing it safely . . . much more difficult.
--
Love these types of threads. For what it’s worth…
STAR TREK THE MOTION PICTURE: Big bad V’GER is approaching Earth at warp Speed. The Enterprise is approaching V’GER at warp speed. At no time does V’GER slow to sub warp speed to allow the loooooong, slow Enterprise pass over the model, I mean alien ship. The Enterprise would have passed V’GER in a second, leaving it miles behind in it’s wake, unless it was slowed down and placed in reverse, travelling at warp speed, a fraction slower than that of V’GER, to allow V’GER to pass under it, rather than the Enterprise pass over it.
I’m sure I can think of more of these…
Thanks to the Director's Edition showcasing what the V'Ger craft actually looks like, it appears that the Enterprise approached the cloud from behind and flew over the craft till it reached the front (The point where Kirk says "Hold relative position here).