If anything, he should have at least included the unaltered versions in addition to the versions he's made changes to
In his mind he did, though. When they included those old laserdisc transfers on the 2004 release.
If anything, he should have at least included the unaltered versions in addition to the versions he's made changes to
Right, right. I was even hearing Queen's "Flash!" in my head as I was typing that. Train of thought jumped the tracks.He couldn't make Flash Gordon, not Buck Rogers.![]()
Has anyone considered that he only had a handful of film ideas to boot? I mean the guy comes from a background in art house movies with little in the way of narrative and he's been revising his biggest success from its inception until moments before he sold ownership.
His contemporaries made tons of other films but as a director, a filmmaker/ writer, he never really went that far. Now he did build all these companies, produced, and raised a family but as a filmmaker alone he never came up with a lot of varied content.
Perhaps the need to revise SW constantly was because he'd run out of ideas? I'm not suggesting it was a good idea to do so, but merely positing a motivation to explain why he made those choices.
I think Josh Robert Thompson's theory is likely correct. He had the idea that the Prequels were actually those small independent experimental films that he always claimed he was going to make one day. The only part of George's statement that wasn't true is that they wouldn't be seen by anyone. I mean George did by all accounts get to make his movies, his way, without interference from anyone. Who knows?
That's dancing around his original motivations. When he couldn't be a race car driver, because of his eyesight, and became the photographer for his local track. How he saw what the guy who filmed the races, who he shared darkroom and assembly space with, did with the footage from the multiple cameras set up around the track, he got fascinated with editing, how the editor controlled what people see. That's what he went to USC for. That's what he and Marcia did for their bread and butter day jobs. He basically wanted to be a documentarian (see Redtails). The rough-cut of Star Wars looks like a war documentary. It's slow and plodding in all the places a History Channel special on WWII or Vietnam tends to be. He created ILM for the technical tools he needed. He's always been more about filmmaking technology than the films themselves. They're a means to... a different means.
He's a nerd who always just wanted to screw around with other nerds and come up with new ways to do the thing. He just needed to make things with enough commercial appeal to keep being able to tinker. He's always uncomfortably walked that knife-edge. On the one hand, he's awkward with all the attention and doesn't really know what to do with it. On the other, he knows he needs it to keep being able to do the stuff he wants to do and also get a whole valley between him and his neighbors.
Between graduating from USC and making the cinematic version of THX, he was working at American Zoetrope up in the Bay Area. Everyone wore every hat there, but he stayed on the technical side of things. Coppola told him he needed to actually write a movie and actually direct a movie to get a proper sense of what he needed to tell those people he needed in the editing bay. Paraphrasing. Those are two things George always was uncomfortable with. Bullet-pointing ideas, jotting down notes during a boring lecture -- that was one thing. But actually working through the whole process of banging out a script was tedious and often frustrating. As directing meant interacting with people and being able to clearly communicate what he wanted them to do. Machines are safer.I didn't know the early part about his life. I knew the broad strokes. The car accident that changed his perspective on life and becoming more serious. Looking for a purpose. I wasn't aware that he made his living as an editor in his early career though but it makes sense.
Oh, absolutely. His instincts there are spot-on.Even he's gone on record many times to say that he's more of an editor than a director. I think a combination of his love of racing and animation (something he's also deeply interested in) worked in his favor to be an editor because he knew when and how to cut on action.
That's one of the things you pick up on right away when watching behind-the-scenes footage of the filming of Star Wars. Harrison. Harrison had worked with George before, was doing the cabinetwork for George's house, was comfortable enough to tell George where to stick it, and George was too awkward to push back. And Mark and Carrie took their cues from Harrison. When Harrison's giving George crap, they join in. Harrison rewrote -- at least slightly -- most of Han's dialogue. It had to have given George fits, but it resulted in much more natural acting from the principals. Compare that to, say, how veteran actors like Liam and Sam and Ewan and Natalie deferred to George's judgment in TPM. All that had changed between was how those working with George had come to view him.Many anecdotes have been told by actors working with him often at the end of takes, he'll ask them, "Is that how you want to do it?" and if they say "yes," he'll move on to setting up the next stuff. His "directing" is more or less collecting material so that he can make the movie in post. He's always been reluctant about doing it.
Having said that, he is definitely a visual type of person. We all wouldn't be here if it weren't for what he still managed to capture even if he isn't like Coppola or Scorsese.
But he should have done it with the last release on Blu-Ray. A choppy Laserdisc copy of the film, and it was in Pan & Scan, shows how little he cared about the versions of the films that gave him an audience in the first place. But the fact of the matter is that I doubt his "the original versions are completely gone" story.In his mind he did, though. When they included those old laserdisc transfers on the 2004 release.
I completely agree with the fact that Lucas is more of an editor than director but having said that he needed a lot of help to tell his story coherently. Without Marcia, Paul Hirsch and Richard Chew as editors, ANH would have been a mess.This. Even he's gone on record many times to say that he's more of an editor than a director. I think a combination of his love of racing and animation (something he's also deeply interested in) worked in his favor to be an editor because he knew when and how to cut on action. Many anecdotes have been told by actors working with him often at the end of takes, he'll ask them, "Is that how you want to do it?" and if they say "yes," he'll move on to setting up the next stuff. His "directing" is more or less collecting material so that he can make the movie in post. He's always been reluctant about doing it.
Having said that, he is definitely a visual type of person. We all wouldn't be here if it weren't for what he still managed to capture even if he isn't like Coppola or Scorsese.
I think of Lucas as a man who created amazing technology through film. He had a a story influenced by Joseph Campbell, Flash Gordon, Dune and Kurosawa but without the special effects group, MacQuarrie and countless others we wouldn’t be talking about these films today. Also, try to imagine the films without the amazing music from John Williams (thank goodness for Spielberg)! His vision is achieved when he works with the team he assembled, not so much when he goes it alone. (Like the lead singer of a great band who splits from the group and proceeds to make mediocre albums the rest of their life.)A lot of true movie “magic” back then to be sure. It’s still rather stunning it all came together and was such a catalyst for all that came after. Thinking such a thing only happens once a lifetime.
TruthGreat editor? Naw.
His wife saved Star Wars…
First cut was unwatchable…
I have felt like that since the releases of episodes 1-2 & 3 after those epic failures the cat was out of the bag so to speak...nothing new just rehashed ideas!Has anyone considered that he only had a handful of film ideas to boot? I mean the guy comes from a background in art house movies with little in the way of narrative and he's been revising his biggest success from its inception until moments before he sold ownership.
His contemporaries made tons of other films but as a director, a filmmaker/ writer, he never really went that far. Now he did build all these companies, produced, and raised a family but as a filmmaker alone he never came up with a lot of varied content.
Perhaps the need to revise SW constantly was because he'd run out of ideas? I'm not suggesting it was a good idea to do so, but merely positing a motivation to explain why he made those choices.