HeartBlade
Sr Member
Agree although I get it. Sephiroth is a huge selling point so no Sephy is going to make the more casual fans mad (even though Seph doesnt really appear until mid-way with his power mostly being shown like slaying the zolom that one shots your party assuming no power leveling).Yeah. They showed Cid and Vincent, so getting at least to those parts.
I've heard rumors it ends with Aries' death (if they even kill her this time?) But that still ONLY cover the first PlayStation disc.
So like 10% of the original game was remake, so its like the next 40 to 50 percent needs to ne Rebirth, so the last part and ending can be part 3.
Just seems like they are going about this wrong, or at least rather odd.
I still think a lot needed to be cut from Remake and probably could have gotten that first part to Junon. Then, get on the ship, fight Jenova, and THAT be the the final boss for Remake and save Sephiroth for later. Then this new game starts in Costa Del Sol.
Remake essentially ends with leaving Midgar which is maybe half of disc one (its been a while but may not even be that). Square doesnt need to be held to the trilogy format but they are going to either have to speed things up or cut storylines from the remake to get to the end of the story in a reasonable time frame. Also kind of feel that FF7 didnt need a remake (8 would have been more useful given the game had some good ideas but a broken battle system and some story threads that could have used some tweaking).
There are rumors of FFXVI DLC, a FFIX remaster, and KH4 so still tons of new content in the pipeline though.
I do wish Square returned to their roots of JRPGs and worked more on expanding the system like they did with Chrono Trigger or 8. Playing through Like a Dragon 7, its honestly quite fun but the system is still too simple and flawed compared to even FF6. Square really are the masters of JRPGs and while modern audiences do love more action games, Square leaving RPGs would hurt that specialization imo.