robn1
Master Member
There's no blaster mark anywhere, Greedo didn't fire.There shouldn't be a blaster mark on the wall. It would be on the ceiling.
View attachment 1089623
There's no blaster mark anywhere, Greedo didn't fire.There shouldn't be a blaster mark on the wall. It would be on the ceiling.
View attachment 1089623
Maybe it's because they've had encounters with a similarly dressed individual & it didn't turn out too well for the Tuscans?Tusken Raider encounter was interestingly done. Sign language! Those two that non-chalantly snuck up behind them and were just chillin’ I found a bit out of character however. They may have experience however and were being wise not to provoke a Mandelorian.
I noticed the lack of a mark, but I didn’t realize it was probably intentional haha!There's no blaster mark anywhere, Greedo didn't fire.
It's because it didn't hit the wall. It hit the stuff behind his head and deflected upwards.I noticed the lack of a mark, but I didn’t realize it was probably intentional haha!
OK..:something doesn’t track well will me, and that’s the aging of the Yoda species.
So, the Baby Yoda is 50 years old and appears to be at around the 1 year mark for a baby human. If so, the ratio of Yoda years to human years appears to be 50:1.
If THE Yoda was 900 years old when he died, he was only 18 in human years??????
(Some member will chime in that “in the Clone Wars cartoon, it was explained that Yoda’s species actually decelerate in their aging the older they get...“)
Your assuming a linear relationshipOK..:something doesn’t track well will me, and that’s the aging of the Yoda species.
So, the Baby Yoda is 50 years old and appears to be at around the 1 year mark for a baby human. If so, the ratio of Yoda years to human years appears to be 50:1.
If THE Yoda was 900 years old when he died, he was only 18 in human years??????
(Some member will chime in that “in the Clone Wars cartoon, it was explained that Yoda’s species actually accelerate in their aging, the older they get, and Yoda was actually closer to 800 years old in Yoda years when he died.”)
Maybe that's why we've only seen three? They are almost extinct?I'm assuming stasis of some kind for some period. I.e., why is everyone suddenly looking for the kid now instead of the year before? Or ten? Or thirty? I know a lot of people don't like injecting real-world reasoning into a fictional setting... that already uses almost-entirely real-world physics and chemistry, but... I can't see a species that has that long a semi-helpless infancy surviving to the point of sapience. Humans are already kind of an extreme in our admittedly limited experience, with as long an infancy as we have. Most animals, including most mammals, are born far more developed and are walking and eating within minutes to hours, rather than months to years.
I know they are apparently strong in the Force. But everything in that biosphere would have roughly equivalent midi-chlorian levels. You don't evolve high levels without need. Unless there are no predators on their planet, and never have been, but I find that unlikely, itself.
So I'm gonna say it was only recently stolen and woken up.
I was thinking the same thing!If it was Fett he's wearing a different style of boots.
Very true!It would have been 5 to 10 years later, so the idea that someone has gotten new boots and all-weather cloak is not the least bit out of the likely
I just checked, Han's booth was the next one over.Ok, why most people think it's the same booth that Solo sat in is odd. This booth was at the front entrance of the Cantina while Solo's was closer to the back entrance.