Just got back from a midnight showing, which had a good audience, even though they must not have seen the trailer since they laughed ridiculously at all those trailer jokes.
I've seen the first movie a couple times over the years and enjoy it each time. It has the right amount of things at stake, tonal feel comedy wise, fun-ness and adventure.
Now Hangover II, I enjoyed more on the second watch on red box after accepting that is has the same plot as the first one. It would be a much more watchable movie for me at least, if they would have skipped out the she-male scene and had left Mel Gibson as the tattoo artist, but nothing you can't skip or get over.
Now this 3rd one, is not as bad as I think people and are critics are giving it, but it does have a little lazy underwhelming feel of the first two movies. Its starts off with a great introduction to Chang, with a little spoof on Shawshank Redemption before it slows down for a long time. It picks back up with a fun scene of Ed Elms getting nervous at a Pharmacy along with a clever little heist following. But, its well worth the watch for the last part of the movie in the Vegas scenes.
I don't know if all the budget went to those, but as soon as we hit Vegas, the pretty cinematography is back along with an intense scene in the hotel room / roof. You have John Goodman and all these great actors and it just feels a missing magic or the greatness that it could have been. At the end of the day after you've seen it once, it feels just like a movie you might catch again on Comedy Central in the future, (if cable still exists by then) or catch on netflix when you've watched everything. Definitely give a check out if you like the actors or the first two movies.
Poor Justin Bartha gets less lines then Heather Graham.