Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (Pre-release)

Honestly I'm not surprised with the outcome of all this. I mean look at what jj had to follow. I'm not saying this gives him a pass because he got the ball rolling in this direction but man was he thrown a curve with 8 that I'm not sure anyone could really recover from. In a way I feel kinda bad for him.

For all the flak Return of the Jedi gets with it's "teddy bear luau" it's still a more worthy ending to the Skywalker saga. At least in that trilogy our heroes got to live happily ever after and as much of a cynic as I can be, I do love happy endings in a fairy tale like this.
 
Honestly I'm not surprised with the outcome of all this. I mean look at what jj had to follow. I'm not saying this gives him a pass because he got the ball rolling in this direction but man was he thrown a curve with 8 that I'm not sure anyone could really recover from. In a way I feel kinda bad for him.
Agreed. I know I feel differently about TLJ than you do, but I admit it most definitely derailed what JJ set in motion. To have to jackknife the wheel back to where he might have had the story go, had he known he would be back to close it all out, has to be pretty difficult given the one movie the conclusion of all this rests on to right the ship.

Of course, that wouldn't be an issue if they had planned the trajectory of this trilogy out first. No argument there from me.
 
de71un2ifvvwr8utgjdaxa-_nc_ht-scontent-fagc1-1-jpg.jpg
 
Why whine about Star Wars when you can have Star Wars wine with your ROS!
obi-wine.jpg

Judging by the reviews it might require some spirits from the Dark side:
51qNC5UoRgL._SX466_.jpg


I don't drink much but I have a collection of Star Wars cannabis for my viewing, I'll start with deathstar and move on to Skywalker OG if I need to lift my spirits. :cool: (y)
 
I know, right?! ;)



Not entirely sure, but do Pre-release threads normally get locked Post-release? I think it would be good practice. On the other hand, if it gives people who will never see the movie a place to commiserate, then I'm all for leaving it open.



That's an awfully childish stance, no? Pretty much equivalent to holding your hand right in front of a sibling's face and taunting them with, "I'm not touching you!" Sorry (not really), broken rules or not, I don't see the point in posting in a Post-release thread just to proudly (wtf?) proclaim, "I didn't and won't ever see _______!" If a person watched the movie and wants to present a valid critique, great. My point is not the censoring of dissenting opinions. But maybe if people don't "exercise their God given right to just ignore stuff" and instead choose to incessantly whine about it...I don't know, if the shoe fits, right? That goes both ways, doesn't it?



I was right there with you until you said Rogue One was terrible, but at least you spelled "Rogue" correctly. :lol:
And if you haven't seen Marriage Story on Netflix, do yourself that favor. It's heavy, especially for anyone who's gone through a rough divorce, but Adam Driver is CRAZY good in it.

oh I’m aware... and I think I have enough distance from my divorce to watch two of my faves go at it. But most nights im still not super stoked to watch a bummer movie, ha.
 
Last edited:
Apologies, end of the semester stress hahaha
But my point in saying that is those are all things in the OT that Luke grew out of or overcame to become the hero he is at the end of ROTJ, as someone for the audience to aspire to be like. The whole point of the Hero’s Journey character arc cycle form of storytelling.
You’re making it out like a character who’s already completed their Heros Journey character arc would/could suddenly just revert to their flawed self at random which is simply not how that’s intended to work because what’s the point in a character arc if they never truly grow from something
In the book, The Art of The Force Awakens, one of the characters, a Jedi named Kira, is described as a “loner, hothead, gear-headed, badass.”

Literally next to gearhead and being hotheaded is a flaw which current Rey lacks.

Well if Pablo changed it, then it is still a change.

The character buildup of Luke in V shows he also has the potential to fall to the dark side due to the love he has for his friends. That would be set up. The actual fall (was planning to strike his nephew down cause he saw darkness in him) is not, especially when he fought to believe in his father who was already with the dark.

Now if Ben subverted his expectations and willingly went to the dark side on his own volition despite Luke’s trust in him, that would have made sense.
It's not set up that such behavior is his destiny to forever react in such a way
(as no sequels were on the map at that point).

it's set up as a lesson to be learned. Had he failed to realize it and learn, the ending would have been much different.
View attachment 1092696

Okay, I'm just going do a quick reply to all three of you.

BobaFettSlave_1 that's okay man. You got Christmas break coming up real quick I hope!

HeartBlade, yep, my bad, just looked at my book this morning. I would say that her hotheadedness is something that they toned down. But she's still got an angry streak. Remember when she banged Luke in the back of the head, then drew a lightsaber on him? Also, Pablo isn't the one who changed things, that would have been Michael, JJ, and Lawrence.

So about Luke, here's my thoughts on it.

In ESB and ROTJ, it's shown that Luke gives in to his fear, anger, hate, aggression. Which if you remember, is what Yoda says is the Dark Side. It's important to also remember that having those emotions isn't the Dark Side, it's acting on those emotions that is the Dark Side. So I as I said we see that in ESB that Luke acts on these emotions when he fails in the cave, and when blindly runs off to "save" his friends. But ROTJ we see that Luke is getting worse. But we also see something else, not only does Luke have a weakness for the Dark Side, but he's ultimately able to resist giving in completely. When the Emperor stokes his fear and anger, prompting Luke to strike out and try to kill him. Vader intercepts the strike, and his anger Luke begins to fight his father, whom he said he wants to save. Whom he loves. But Luke does something remarkable, he's able to see what he's doing pull himself back. But then Vader is the one to fuel his fear and anger. And this time Luke really losses it. He flies into rage attacking his father whom he loves. And beats him down ready to kill him, but once again Luke is able to pull himself back from the brink of darkness to the Light.

But here's the problem. Luke was able to stop himself from going fully to the Dark Side. But that doesn't mean he's suddenly become a sinless Dark Side free saint. In fact, it means the opposite. It means that Luke will always have this Dark Side thorn in his side. Remember what Yoda said, "once down the Dark path you start, forever will dominate your destiny." I mean look how Doug Chaing describes Luke at the time they were meeting George when they first started on TFA "At this point in the story, thirty years after the fall of the Empire, Luke has gone to a dark place. He always had this potential Dark Side within him, being that his father was Darth Vader. So he is really struggling with that.

Also, remember too that Luke is acting on his Jedi instincts. That being destroying the Dark Side no matter what. I was just watching Rebels last week, and Kanan goes into the old Jedi Temple, and he has this vision of Temple Guards. And they tell Kanan that they need to kill Ezra because he's being tempted by the Dark Side, and they need to stop before he becomes a threat.

It's no wonder Luke cuts himself from the Force and disillusioned with the Jedi.
 
Okay, I'm just going do a quick reply to all three of you.

BobaFettSlave_1 that's okay man. You got Christmas break coming up real quick I hope!

HeartBlade, yep, my bad, just looked at my book this morning. I would say that her hotheadedness is something that they toned down. But she's still got an angry streak. Remember when she banged Luke in the back of the head, then drew a lightsaber on him? Also, Pablo isn't the one who changed things, that would have been Michael, JJ, and Lawrence.

So about Luke, here's my thoughts on it.

In ESB and ROTJ, it's shown that Luke gives in to his fear, anger, hate, aggression. Which if you remember, is what Yoda says is the Dark Side. It's important to also remember that having those emotions isn't the Dark Side, it's acting on those emotions that is the Dark Side. So I as I said we see that in ESB that Luke acts on these emotions when he fails in the cave, and when blindly runs off to "save" his friends. But ROTJ we see that Luke is getting worse. But we also see something else, not only does Luke have a weakness for the Dark Side, but he's ultimately able to resist giving in completely. When the Emperor stokes his fear and anger, prompting Luke to strike out and try to kill him. Vader intercepts the strike, and his anger Luke begins to fight his father, whom he said he wants to save. Whom he loves. But Luke does something remarkable, he's able to see what he's doing pull himself back. But then Vader is the one to fuel his fear and anger. And this time Luke really losses it. He flies into rage attacking his father whom he loves. And beats him down ready to kill him, but once again Luke is able to pull himself back from the brink of darkness to the Light.

But here's the problem. Luke was able to stop himself from going fully to the Dark Side. But that doesn't mean he's suddenly become a sinless Dark Side free saint. In fact, it means the opposite. It means that Luke will always have this Dark Side thorn in his side. Remember what Yoda said, "once down the Dark path you start, forever will dominate your destiny." I mean look how Doug Chaing describes Luke at the time they were meeting George when they first started on TFA "At this point in the story, thirty years after the fall of the Empire, Luke has gone to a dark place. He always had this potential Dark Side within him, being that his father was Darth Vader. So he is really struggling with that.

Also, remember too that Luke is acting on his Jedi instincts. That being destroying the Dark Side no matter what. I was just watching Rebels last week, and Kanan goes into the old Jedi Temple, and he has this vision of Temple Guards. And they tell Kanan that they need to kill Ezra because he's being tempted by the Dark Side, and they need to stop before he becomes a threat.

It's no wonder Luke cuts himself from the Force and disillusioned with the Jedi.
That's a rather bleak view of the human psyche and not at all in line with general behavior. I'm really glad I never dove into the EU as it seems to have retconned Luke's character into something other than what the OT presented.
 
Okay, I'm just going do a quick reply to all three of you.

BobaFettSlave_1 that's okay man. You got Christmas break coming up real quick I hope!

HeartBlade, yep, my bad, just looked at my book this morning. I would say that her hotheadedness is something that they toned down. But she's still got an angry streak. Remember when she banged Luke in the back of the head, then drew a lightsaber on him? Also, Pablo isn't the one who changed things, that would have been Michael, JJ, and Lawrence.

So about Luke, here's my thoughts on it.

In ESB and ROTJ, it's shown that Luke gives in to his fear, anger, hate, aggression. Which if you remember, is what Yoda says is the Dark Side. It's important to also remember that having those emotions isn't the Dark Side, it's acting on those emotions that is the Dark Side. So I as I said we see that in ESB that Luke acts on these emotions when he fails in the cave, and when blindly runs off to "save" his friends. But ROTJ we see that Luke is getting worse. But we also see something else, not only does Luke have a weakness for the Dark Side, but he's ultimately able to resist giving in completely. When the Emperor stokes his fear and anger, prompting Luke to strike out and try to kill him. Vader intercepts the strike, and his anger Luke begins to fight his father, whom he said he wants to save. Whom he loves. But Luke does something remarkable, he's able to see what he's doing pull himself back. But then Vader is the one to fuel his fear and anger. And this time Luke really losses it. He flies into rage attacking his father whom he loves. And beats him down ready to kill him, but once again Luke is able to pull himself back from the brink of darkness to the Light.

But here's the problem. Luke was able to stop himself from going fully to the Dark Side. But that doesn't mean he's suddenly become a sinless Dark Side free saint. In fact, it means the opposite. It means that Luke will always have this Dark Side thorn in his side. Remember what Yoda said, "once down the Dark path you start, forever will dominate your destiny." I mean look how Doug Chaing describes Luke at the time they were meeting George when they first started on TFA "At this point in the story, thirty years after the fall of the Empire, Luke has gone to a dark place. He always had this potential Dark Side within him, being that his father was Darth Vader. So he is really struggling with that.

Also, remember too that Luke is acting on his Jedi instincts. That being destroying the Dark Side no matter what. I was just watching Rebels last week, and Kanan goes into the old Jedi Temple, and he has this vision of Temple Guards. And they tell Kanan that they need to kill Ezra because he's being tempted by the Dark Side, and they need to stop before he becomes a threat.

It's no wonder Luke cuts himself from the Force and disillusioned with the Jedi.

Definitely need a break lol. Graduating and seeking new employment if everything works out

As for Luke, Yes I agree that in ROTJ we see Luke use a lot of things we typically assign to The Darkside. That's entirely done on purpose for his character. He's lost to Vader, had his world destroyed, lost his best friend and now needs to rescue him from the SW equivalent of Al Capone. He's in a real fragile spot for a protagonist to be in and it's meant to make the audience feel that he could go either way (to add tension and all that)
Even still however, Luke remains true to himself and his ideals throughout the entire film, whereas Yoda and Obi-wan saw absolutely no possible way in redemption from the Dark Side, and try to convince Luke of such.
Yoda - "Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny. Consume you it will, as it did Obi-wan's apprentice"
Obiwan - "He's more machine now than a man... Twisted and evil..." *and when Luke still refuses to agree to face/kill Vader* "Then the Emperor has already won... You were our only hope.."
Both Yoda and Obi-wan, characters set up as Mentors, of "The wise old man" within the Heros journey arc, are both absolutists. They see no possible return from the Darkside once you've started down that path, and especially so once you're already well down it like Vader is.
Fast forward to the DS2 scenes, and we have the Emperor desperately trying to get Luke to change, and likewise Luke find that change within his own father
Luke does indeed seemingly start to slip down that Dark path once put in a point of desperation, watching the fleet be destroyed helplessly before his eyes while the Emperor whispers poison in his ear until Luke finally slips..., but Luke immediately catches himself. Its his own internal struggle with himself from that moment, and when Vader threatens his sister he almost falls right off the ledge plummeting to the Darkside. All true....
Right up until the moment he sees his fathers hand and draws the parallels to himself...
It's in that moment Luke surges completely back to good, throwing his lightsaber away and his possible path down the Darkside along with it... It's in this singular moment, what the Hero's Journey typically refers to as "Atonement", that he finally once and for all becomes the Hero he was meant to become within the story... and it is also in that moment of desperation soon after where Luke is literally going to die at the hands of the Emperor rather than turn to the Darkside, that his own father, the single most evil man in he galaxy next to Palpatine himself, finds his own redemption and comes back to the light seeing the strength of Luke's resistance to evil, and sacrificing himself in that moment to save the son who put literally EVERYTHING on the line in order just to prove anyone can come back from the Dark..

I'm a firm believer you can make any character do anything you want them to, and you absolutely can have Luke become what he is in the ST, as crappy as it is to see. But you NEED to write for it. That reason for change needs to be seen and be as significant as the consequences for the change itself to the character. We didn't even get a fraction of that for the gap between ROTJ and TFA. Yes all that stuff Ben and the Jedi temple did happen, but that's simply not enough when Luke in the past is a character who thought that it was possible for ANYONE to redeem themselves, and also proved that in the end that it is indeed possible, showing both Yoda and Obi-wan that they were themselves wrong in their own views.
And you can be sure as hell that Vader did a hell of a lot more horrible things than Ben ever did, and that's the problem with his change in the ST
It simply was not earned
 
Last edited:
Luke was able to stop himself from going fully to the Dark Side. But that doesn't mean he's suddenly become a sinless Dark Side free saint. In fact, it means the opposite. It means that Luke will always have this Dark Side thorn in his side. Remember what Yoda said, "once down the Dark path you start, forever will dominate your destiny."
Well, this is one of those things that I bring up when people say (paraphrasing here) "Yes, Luke was tempted by the Dark Side in the OT, but he overcame that temptation, so it makes no sense for him to be tempted with that again." First, I don't even think you have to invoke what Yoda said about the Dark Side forever dominating one's destiny. That is largely superfluous here. The simple truth is that, despite movies and TV spending decades trying to persuade us that triumphing over one's demons one time "when it matters most" means being forever free of them afterward, that is rarely true in real life. In real life, our demons, or strongholds, or weaker natures, or whatever you want to call them, are things we must battle and overcome again and again and again in this life. And there wasn't much difference in what Luke did in RotJ and what he had done that we saw in TLJ -- he was angry and/or afraid -- with some justification -- and lashed out. In Empire, he stopped himself before he killed Vader -- but not before carving him up a bit and essentially defeating him soundly. Only when he caught sight of his own mechanical hand and heard Palpatine having a chuckle (which should cause anyone to think "Hmmm ... that can't be good") did he stop himself. In TFA, he saw what Ben Solo could become, reflexively activated his saber out of fear (fear for others, which was his weakness in RotJ as well) and prepared to strike -- and then he stopped himself. At least that time, he didn't maim the guy first. And he certainly could have killed him -- it is only when he stops that Ben awakens and strikes back.

I've overcome some of my worst weaknesses at times, even when it was really hard to do. And yet, even decades later in some cases, they still pop up and sometimes they win. I try not to let them win, and it helps that I know I have defeated them in the past, but it is still very difficult at best. Under serious pressure, most of us are vulnerable to regress to our most-ingrained behaviors. We forget the better knowledge and lessons we may have learned, and go back to the things we "knew" earliest and best, because those are the things we don't have to think about first.

Sure, you can say real life is irrelevant because this is a fable. I'll grant that conceit in some instances, but this business of defeating one's demons one time being the same as beating them once and for all has always bothered me. And having a fable that shows that we will always have to be vigilant against our weaker impulses -- while not allowing a slip-up to be an excuse to just throw in the towel completely -- is a good thing, and entirely proper for the role of a fable.

SSB
 
So if it all eventually ends in ****, then honestly what's the point in any of this in the first place?
These stories and countless others like it through the decades and centuries are meant to set examples of character for people to aspire to be like even if reality is a nightmare.. To aspire to be good people and remain as such through even the toughest of times... If it all just boils down to things chipping away at you until you finally do break, then that's just crap, I'm sorry. Yes reality is garbage but why reflect that onto the media that was originally intended to lift us up and distract us away from that?
 
Because a story where Luke is just ***** returned is not interesting.

I was fine if they never continued the story... but since they were going to, time to make things crappy for everyone so thereès something to fight back from.

Thus T2 was not just a story of Sarah Connor chilling in mexico - she was hospitalized and estranged from the future leader.

Attack of the Killer Tomatoes 2... They could take human form - I dunno I barely remember that sequel...

What are some others... man this was a bad argument to start. When is work over so I can get baked and watch TLJ before tomorrow....

:D

I found out at work today this guy Warren brought in a bunch of tickets for people to see it tomorrow at 7:00... but I already have tickets.

Some coworkers were talking about it... I guess they won the raffle. They were wondering why Warren would randomly do this... must be a big Star Wars fan...

Haha... His IMDB link -

I WONDER WHY HE LOVES STAR WARS
 
Last edited:
So if it all eventually ends in ****, then honestly what's the point in any of this in the first place?
These stories and countless others like it through the decades and centuries are meant to set examples of character for people to aspire to be like even if reality is a nightmare.. To aspire to be good people and remain as such through even the toughest of times... If it all just boils down to things chipping away at you until you finally do break, then that's just crap, I'm sorry. Yes reality is garbage but why reflect that onto the media that was originally intended to lift us up and distract us away from that?

Because I can't ever hope to aspire to be like someone who's become perfect. I can relate, to a character who messes up time and again, but always stands back, acknowledges their shortcomings and moves forward.

I heard a lot of people say "not my Luke." So now it's my turn.

This isn't my Luke
main-qimg-cba13e23f1a373429725c56b8a90f3b5.jpg


This is my Luke
giphy.gif

tumblr_inline_p9ol4iCVlg1sqy18z_540.gif
 
Happy endings are just stories that have not finished yet.
I was fine if they never continued the story... but since they were going to, time to make things crappy for everyone so thereès something to fight back from.

Thus T2 was not just a story of Sarah Connor chilling in mexico - she was hospitalized and estranged from the future leader.

Attack of the Killer Tomatoes 2... They could take human form - I dunno I barely remember that sequel...

What are some others... man this was a bad argument to start. When is work over so I can get baked and watch TLJ before tomorrow....

:D
Seriously we gotta find you a wife, bro. lol ;)
 
Again I'm not saying you can't do that with Lukes character, but Disney/KK/JJ/Rian simply did not put in the necessary work via the writing in order to make Luke change that significantly in my mind. It's just such a dramatic character shift from what we'd seen in the past with him, especially with the context of all the horrible things Vader did and Luke fighting so hard to bring him back. Nothing his nephew has done on screen warranted that big of a change. If they'd written in that Ben had perhaps killed Lukes wife and child were he to have had a family post ROTJ in addition to destroying the new Jedi temple then maybe, but not just simply doing a repeat of his father and wiping out the Jedi again, especially before it ever even actually happened
 
Last edited:
Again I'm not saying you can't do that with Lukes character, but Disney/KK/JJ/Rian simply did not put in the necessary work via the writing in order to make Luke change that significant in my mind. It's such a dramatic character shift from what we'd seen in the past with him, especially with the context of all the horrible things Vader did and Luke fighting so hard to bring him back. Nothing his nephew has done on screen warranted that big of a change. If they'd written in that Ben had perhaps killed Lukes wife and child were he to have one post ROTJ then maybe, but not just doing a repeat of his father, especially before it even actually happened

But there's no change. He's the same. He's still fighting those same demons. The only change is one you've applied to the character in your mind.

This is what Luke did to his father, whom he loves, and emphatically said he wouldn't fight.

9ic5tz7no3a9.gif
 
But there's no change. He's the same. He's still fighting those same demons. The only change is one you've applied to the character in your mind.

This is what Luke did to his father, whom he loves, and emphatically said he wouldn't fight.

View attachment 1092836

I'm not sure I would ever say that Luke actually "loves" his father. Hes simply trying to save him because he is family, what little of one he has left, and almost follows him down that same path in his attempts to bring him back before achieving his goal. He almost becomes his father, but at the last minute turns back because hes stronger than his father, his father sees this and then pulls himself back as well because Luke becomes something to aspire to be. To show that evil doesn't always triumph if one remains true to themselves

I suspect this is eventually going to boil down to a "Agree to disagree" situation and there's nothing wrong with that. We simply see the role of a protagonist in a story differently is all

For me, I'd argue that there was a change. One that had existed on film for 30 years until it was stolen from him along with all the other achievements of our original heros so that these new heros could redo all of those things again for them. Even killing Palpatine
 
Last edited:
Back
Top