Bigdaddy
Master Member
While using unnecessary dismissive language at the same time.well I gave an alternate opinion. They aren't in space.
I happen to agree that those scenes in the trailer are likely in atmosphere rather than space.
While using unnecessary dismissive language at the same time.well I gave an alternate opinion. They aren't in space.
Edit: Never mind. Watching again, you can see the Falcon's engines blasting them back.
And if the thrust from the Falcon's engines are knocking the troopers back, why is the Falcon stationary?
Yes, it's a space fantasy, but stuff like this (gravity bombs in space...) just pulls you right out of the story. I'm sure someone can/will come up with some elaborate explantion, but it's still bad writing.
That would make Rey 30 years old at the time of TFA.So, the SUPER DUPER Homunculus that should be Rey was unfortunately lost during the Destruction of the DS2. But guess what?! Scouring the debris in the aftermath of the battle of Yavin, Rebel Alliance agents found a superfortified sphere that contained a baby girl.
He's 50. But still he's toddler with no training! What a Gary Stu!There is def whining in this thread... which is a weird 180 over on mandalorian thread where it was a hyperbolic love fest last I checked (though did see ep 2 and it was a lot better)
There should be reshoots just to incorporate this guy...
View attachment 1085873
He’d be what? 80? Still a toddler?
But what if the bombs where propelled? Like magnetically propelled? I mean it's not the first time we've seen bombs "falling" in space.And if the thrust from the Falcon's engines are knocking the troopers back, why is the Falcon stationary?
Yes, it's a space fantasy, but stuff like this (gravity bombs in space...) just pulls you right out of the story. I'm sure someone can/will come up with some elaborate explantion, but it's still bad writing.
There is def whining in this thread... which is a weird 180 over on mandalorian thread where it was a hyperbolic love fest last I checked (though did see ep 2 and it was a lot better)
There should be reshoots just to incorporate this guy...
View attachment 1085873
He’d be what? 80? Still a toddler?
That would make Rey 30 years old at the time of TFA.
You're right on thatHe's 50. But still he's toddler with no training! What a Gary Stu!![]()
You're right on thatand I mentioned in the Mando thread that baby Yoda could cause some problems that way as Rey has.
Yeah if they can explain it somehow, then I'm willing to go with it. Plus he's so freaking adorable.I think that the baby Yoda is simply a clone of Yoda which would explain his usage of the force. But we'll see, maybe he's a Gary Stu. But at least he's fun to watch and his character seems to have an arc.
But what if the bombs where propelled? Like magnetically propelled? I mean it's not the first time we've seen bombs "falling" in space.
That would work too. But the actual canon answer is they are magnetically propelled.They don't have to be propelled. Once an object is travelling in a direction, it will continue to travel until another force is acted upon it. The bombs fell from within a ship that had strong enough gravity to stand upright (and to fall off a ladder), therefore when they entered space, they would continue to have that momentum i.e. falling from the ship.
It really is basic physics that even my 11 year old is being taught right now
But this is why I have issues with the second half of the movie. In the first half of the movie it’s basic real world space physics 101 with momentum and movement in space. Surely then the issue of running out of fuel would not be so burning (no pun intended), because the ships can just do the same: reach top speed, turn off the engines and go by momentum only needing engines to course correct.They don't have to be propelled. Once an object is travelling in a direction, it will continue to travel until another force is acted upon it. The bombs fell from within a ship that had strong enough gravity to stand upright (and to fall off a ladder), therefore when they entered space, they would continue to have that momentum i.e. falling from the ship.
It really is basic physics that even my 11 year old is being taught right now
I just assumed it was the Will of the Force.That would work too. But the actual canon answer is they are magnetically propelled.
It's not a contradiction.But this is why I have issues with the second half of the movie. In the first half of the movie it’s basic real world space physics 101 with momentum and movement in space. Surely then the issue of running out of fuel would not be so burning (no pun intended), because the ships can just do the same: reach top speed, turn off the engines and go by momentum only needing engines to course correct.
I know SW is not proper scifi, we have sound in space, lightbeam that stops at around a metre to form a baton, hyperspace (whatever it is) etc and all ships always had their engines on in every movie because they were emulating old school dogfights but it’s still a contradiction within a single film on how things move in space.