Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

I said many times before the show premiered I was expecting the trappings of Trek, but none of the substance. I began suspecting this would be the case when I saw the art direction—visual callbacks to TOS that smelled like misdirection (yes, I’m mixing metaphors, visuals don’t smell, leave me alone, I’m old).

The stories are an extension of the same strategy—let’s camouflage our show in tbe colors of TOS, and maybe the fans won’t notice we’re crapping all over it. So we get TOS-based characters and story elements, but subtly altered so they’re more in line with

They hoped we’d be so enamored with the body of Trek, we’d forgive them for ripping out its soul.

Well, after years of this, I’m not in a forgiving mood.

Fixed.
 
In case anyone’s even mildly curious, Wikipedia has a comprehensive list of body swap stories throughout time. It’s not a distinguished roster by a long shot. Who knew there were so many Freaky Friday remakes?
 
I said many times before the show premiered I was expecting the trappings of Trek, but none of the substance.
Like Trelane's food.

I began suspecting this would be the case when I saw the art direction—visual callbacks to TOS that smelled like misdirection (yes, I’m mixing metaphors, visuals don’t smell, leave me alone, I’m old).
The bridge is a great example. Matt Jefferies and Pato Guzman put a lot of work into the original design to make it as real world functional as possible. They even made full size mock ups to make sure that everything was well positioned, like the row of square displays that were placed at eye level. The SNW bridge has these panels up over head where the labels couldn't even be read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron
Just wait until next week’s episode when they have some Trouble with Tribbles that take Spock’s Brain and play hacky sack with it on Shore Leave where it’s stolen by a white rabbit and ultimately winds up back in time being used to remotely steer a 20th century car getting a Piece of the Action by a slow moving Lizard guy.

But then again, those are way to silly and would never show up in Star Trek.
Looking forward to that...
Q6HDRCN0tSpk83rT4W.gif
 
I've got to admit, while the show has many many flaws that I am critical about, I am finding some small things about it that I like, and that's what's keeping me watching. I've given up hoping of seeing anything up to the level of TOS or the Berman-era Trek, especially under the current stewardship, because they just don't get Star Trek. But with SNW, I'll give them some credit... not a lot... just a little... for trying.

Five episodes in and we're still treading on familiar, treaded before, grounds... absolutely nothing new. Every episode seems to be calling back to a previous, and better done, episode of Trek and at times it can get infuriating. The showrunners are obviously banking on member-berries and nostalgia to bring in the viewers, especially fans of older Trek. The lirpa duel in the latest episode pissed me off, especially when they also brought back that iconic TOS lirpa duel music... it was blatant and shameless. By comparison, aside from De Kelley's appearance in the pilot and the space virus in The Naked Now, TNG tried its best to stand on its own two feet in its maiden season.

And I hate the frequent callbacks to STD... it's as if Kurtzman wants to keep reminding us that we wouldn't have this show if not for STD. What he doesn't realize is that STD is so bad that's why fans wanted a show like SNW that feels more like the Trek we know. While SNW still has a long way to go to prove itself, you can't deny there is a tiny bit of effort to streamline it into the Trek we're familiar with.

The writing is just all over the place. We're a long way from the quality writing by the likes of DC Fontana, Harlan Ellison, David Gerrold or even Ron Moore and Naren Shankar, and I do hope that will change, as this show would benefit a lot from people who actually know and have written sci-fi. In the latest Critical Drinker After Hours, Marc Zicree told the Drinker that he's been in contact with the SNW showrunners offering his writing services and I do hope they take him up on that offer.

I don't like how Pike runs his ship; chain of command is quesionable. Whereas Kirk commanded his ship in a militaristic way, and Picard ran his like a no-nonsense CEO heading an 80s/90s multinational corporation, Pike runs his like a millennial running a tech startup... too casual for my liking. Last week's Gorn episode could have been a good one if not for Pike having his command decisions questioned almost every time by Discount Drummer and Discount Vasquez. And the latest episode's nonsense with the Enterprise Bingo - Kirk and Picard wouldn't have put up with such things on their ships.

And of course the worst part is the continuing retconning of Trek canon by Kurtzman and co.

But like I said earlier, there are some positives. The show is just gorgeous to look at, obviously they've spared no expense when it comes to production value (just the writing). Every shot is cinematic... compare this to the latest episode of Obi-wan Kenobi in which the confrontation in the third act was shot un-cinematically that it looked like it was taken from a fanfilm.

I do like some of the characters. Anson Mount (what a great pornstar name!) is the the reason why I watch this show in the first place... he made Season 2 of STD watchable. And he's certainly good as Pike... I just wished he was stricter and not trying to be more buddy-like with the crew. Ethan Peck may be miscast as Spock but you gotta admit he's trying his best with what he's given. I like Rebecca Romjin as Number One and Nurse Chapel is quickly warming up to me. One thing this show has in common with TOS is the beautiful women. Both Discount Drummer and Discount Vasquez are actually stunners in real life without the ridiculous haircuts and the permanent scowl.

Is SNW a better show than STD and Picard? Abso-frackin-lutely, but not by a huge margin. I just hope it will start to stand on its two feet rather than keep calling back to previous Trek episodes. And I do hope they bring in quality writers. For now I'll keep watching and maybe some day I will be surprised by what I

Looking forward to that...


Maybe it's because we watch it on a. Obscenely large screen every week which makes it feel more like a cinema experience but we both really enjoyed this episode.. It went off of tangents, it had a classic fight scene from The Cable Guy! (Ha!) and had Enterprise Bingo!.. I enjoyed the show but how come they can walk outside without suits but 40 plus years or so later in STTMP they Don suits?
Pike is shooting from the hip and guiding his fresh young crew molding them into who they might become.
I enjoyed the Spock story and it made for an amusing couple of scenes..
And its so...... Much better than Discovery and its real world politics and Picard which was dire!
 
…which is not a great episode, since Kirk’s titular obsession is out of character. And they questioned him in private.

They didn't do it in public, which is the point. Spock didn't say "Hey Jim, you're being an ass!" on the bridge.

In Obsession he was publicly challemged on the bridge about the rendezvous with the Yorktown. In The Deadly Years he was publicly challenged on the bridge about signing the fuel consumption report and increasing the orbit. I’m sure there are other examples. The point is they didn’t always just blindly follow his orders without question.
 
Like Trelane's food.


The bridge is a great example. Matt Jefferies and Pato Guzman put a lot of work into the original design to make it as real world functional as possible. They even made full size mock ups to make sure that everything was well positioned, like the row of square displays that were placed at eye level. The SNW bridge has these panels up over head where the labels couldn't even be read.

As I’ve noted before, the NuTREK sets look fancy and expensive, but they most certainly do not look like they’ve be comfortable to live and work in for years at a time. Lots of bright lights and reflective surfaces and so on.
 
In Obsession he was publicly challemged on the bridge about the rendezvous with the Yorktown. In The Deadly Years he was publicly challenged on the bridge about signing the fuel consumption report and increasing the orbit. I’m sure there are other examples. The point is they didn’t always just blindly follow his orders without question.

I don’t believe anyone is saying that. There are most certainly instances where people like Scotty or Sulu questioned Kirk’s orders on the Bridge. Most of those instances were people trying to do their jobs correctly (due to Kirk’s growing senility in “The Deadly Years”), pointing out situations where lives would be put in serious jeopardy (“Obsession”), or noting that Kirk’s commands appeared to be in serious violation of Starfleet orders (“The Enterprise Incident”).

But the sort of grumbling, flippant, millennial-snark that we see now was not present.
 
I don’t believe anyone is saying that. There are most certainly instances where people like Scotty or Sulu questioned Kirk’s orders on the Bridge. Most of those instances were people trying to do their jobs correctly (due to Kirk’s growing senility in “The Deadly Years”), pointing out situations where lives would be put in serious jeopardy (“Obsession”), or noting that Kirk’s commands appeared to be in serious violation of Starfleet orders (“The Enterprise Incident”).

But the sort of grumbling, flippant, millennial-snark that we see now was not present.
Exactly: there's a big difference between ascertaining the instructions they were given/ pointing out important info that they felt needed to be addressed, and simply whining about a situation. Professionalism is about doing what is necessary to get the job done; any good commander/ boss will recognize that as opposed to someone whose attitude and actions simply undermine the command structure.
 
I enjoyed the show but how come they can walk outside without suits but 40 plus years or so later in STTMP they Don suits?

Well firstly TMP is 15ish years away. Secondly, they specifically talk about how dangerous what they are doing is. One hiccup in the force field and they are dead. They were specifically trying to find something sufficiently against the rules to get into the spirit of Enterprise Bingo, since their ranks give them the authority to allow the rules breaking that is in the regular bingo challenges.
 
My friends, how many times do I have to say it….

You can’t expect “McDonald’s Happy Meal Star Trek” (Strange New Worlds)….

FAD40C36-3991-4FF9-A382-7D1A821CFD89.jpeg


…to compare to “Charbroiled Kobe Trek” (Classic Trek)…
75F4E1E0-1193-44AC-AB3F-CA152A0C14BB.jpeg


Adjust (lower) your expectations when turning on Paramount’s current offering and you won’t end up looking like this at the end of each new episode:

AAB238EA-FBD2-4F3E-AFD0-283CF7660869.jpeg


I don’t seriously invest in any of the character and story elements of SNW and it’s just a passable diversion for me, like watching a random home renovation show on HGTV. By no means do I take it seriously and I can enjoy some elements of it (set and prop design, etc.) while blowing off the rest as laughable, clumsy and cringy contemporary politics, derivative, or lazy.

Case in point was when Spock and T’Ping swapped bodies with all the sophistication of that movie where Jason Bateman and Ryan Reynolds switched bodies by peeing into a fountain at the same time.

Hilarious stuff…


ACF1E52A-CC70-4D4F-B9D9-933D0246FF5F.jpeg
 
Last edited:
My friends, how many times do I have to say it….

You can’t expect “McDonald’s Happy Meal Star Trek” (Strange New Worlds)….

View attachment 1583347

…to compare to “Charbroiled Kobe Trek” (Classic Trek)…
View attachment 1583349

Adjust (lower) your expectations when turning on Paramount’s current offering and you won’t end up looking like this at the end of each new episode:

View attachment 1583350

I don’t seriously invest in any of the character and story elements of SNW and it’s just a passable diversion for me, like watching a random home renovation show on HGTV. By no means do I take it seriously and I can enjoy some elements of it (set and prop design, etc.) while blowing off the rest as laughable, derivative, or lazy.

Case in point was when Spock and T’Ping swapped bodies with all the sophistication of that movie where Jason Bateman and Ryan Reynolds switched bodies by peeing into a fountain at the same time.

Hilarious stuff…

I thought he looked like this after consuming what appeared to be lukewarm ravioli and capers from your previous culinary/tv series comparison post ;)

I enjoy Strange New Worlds…if this were a movie, we would be at the middle of the film now, trying to find the fish…perhaps the good doctor caught one, guess I will watch again to confirm

I am entertained by the midpoint episode, nothing more, nothing less (like Paul Sorvino in Murder She Wrote…baseball!)
 
I don’t seriously invest in any of the character and story elements of SNW and it’s just a passable diversion for me, like watching a random home renovation show on HGTV. By no means do I take it seriously and I can enjoy some elements of it (set and prop design, etc.) while blowing off the rest as laughable, derivative, or lazy.

That's really all it is for me. It's something to do while I'm in-between other, better shows. It's not so bad that I want to stop watching but it's nothing that I'm going to focus on either. That's true of a lot of shows these days. They're just there. They're filler. There's nothing of substance on the screen.
 
My friends, how many times do I have to say it….

You can’t expect “McDonald’s Happy Meal Star Trek” (Strange New Worlds)….

View attachment 1583347

…to compare to “Charbroiled Kobe Trek” (Classic Trek)…
View attachment 1583349

Adjust (lower) your expectations when turning on Paramount’s current offering and you won’t end up looking like this at the end of each new episode:

View attachment 1583350

I don’t seriously invest in any of the character and story elements of SNW and it’s just a passable diversion for me, like watching a random home renovation show on HGTV. By no means do I take it seriously and I can enjoy some elements of it (set and prop design, etc.) while blowing off the rest as laughable, clumsy and cringy contemporary politics, derivative, or lazy.

Case in point was when Spock and T’Ping swapped bodies with all the sophistication of that movie where Jason Bateman and Ryan Reynolds switched bodies by peeing into a fountain at the same time.

Hilarious stuff…


View attachment 1583359
That's really all it is for me. It's something to do while I'm in-between other, better shows. It's not so bad that I want to stop watching but it's nothing that I'm going to focus on either. That's true of a lot of shows these days. They're just there. They're filler. There's nothing of substance on the screen.


I say this without emotion or judgement, but if you want things to improve, you need to vote with your wallets. Every subscription and every view of inferior products is tacit approval, and a "Yes, I want more shows like this" vote. "You need to see it before you can judge it" is really not an excuse, in today's day and age.

I've personally taken the hard line, and will never buy or watch a Disney STAR WARS or Bad Reboot/Secret Hideout STAR TREK product again. Unless I see hard evidence of actual improvement and respect for the material and the audience, which is highly unlikely. Far too many bridges have been burned, at this point, and I will not reward them for their continued destruction of things I hold dear, and their continued attacks against loyal fans with legitimate criticisms.

Once you get unplugged from the Matrix, it's shockingly easy to stay unplugged. Take those red pills, people.



That being said, we all have lapses. I must confess to being a sinner.

While on vacation, recently, I made the mistake of buying a TREK novel that was published last year, set during the TOS movie era. "What harm could there be?", I said. "It's a TOS-era novel", I said.

Unfortunately, there were STD/LOWER DECKS references peppered throughout, as well as unsubtle references to--and lecturing about--current hot-button issues such as vaccines and gender identity. I just wanted a fun STAR TREK story with the TOS cast, and was instead confronted by things which pulled me out of the story and reminded me of the sad state of the franchise. I wanted to return the book to the store, but decided to keep it as a reminder.

I won't be making that mistake again.

New= Bad. I'll seek out older novels and comics and whatnot, instead.
 
...oh, and we should pay our respects to STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN on its 40th anniversary, today. A film that Bad Reboot and Secret Hideout have consistently (and badly) ripped off for over a decade, simply because it's popular and a bit more action-adventure oriented than usual STAR TREK, and therefore requires less brainpower to plagiarize.

We should also be grateful that Nick Meyer's CETI ALPHA V scripts went unproduced, considering how his early STD scripts ended up being rewritten. Although I'd love to read those scripts.
 
Last edited:
I say this without emotion or judgement, but if you want things to improve, you need to vote with your wallets. Every subscription and every view of inferior products is tacit approval, and a "Yes, I want more shows like this" vote. "You need to see it before you can judge it" is really not an excuse, in today's day and age.

I've personally taken the hard line, and will never buy or watch a Disney STAR WARS or Bad Reboot/Secret Hideout STAR TREK product again. Unless I see hard evidence of actual improvement and respect for the material and the audience, which is highly unlikely. Far too many bridges have been burned, at this point, and I will not reward them for their continued destruction of things I hold dear, and their continued attacks against loyal fans with legitimate criticisms.

Once you get unplugged from the Matrix, it's shockingly easy to stay unplugged. Take those red pills, people.



That being said, we all have lapses. I must confess to being a sinner.

While on vacation, recently, I made the mistake of buying a TREK novel that was published last year, set during the TOS movie era. "What harm could there be?", I said. "It's a TOS-era novel", I said.

Unfortunately, there were STD/LOWER DECKS references peppered throughout, as well as unsubtle references to--and lecturing about--current hot-button issues such as vaccines and gender identity. I just wanted a fun STAR TREK story with the TOS cast, and was instead confronted by things which pulled me out of the story and reminded me of the sad state of the franchise. I wanted to return the book to the store, but decided to keep it as a reminder.

I won't be making that mistake again.

New= Bad. I'll seek out older novels and comics and whatnot, instead.
It's all good; as far as actual Trek, the older stuff should be safe. "Strange New Worlds" I really had hopes for, but now it's tuning into "SJW" and it's sad.
 


Once more, with feeling: Spock and T'Pring were telepathically bonded as kids, and then met again as adults when he went into Pon Farr, during "Amok Time". They weren't a lovingly-engaged couple who occasionally hung out, went to dinner, and banged when he had free time. It was an arranged marriage, with neither being in the other's life until the proper time came, decades later.

Let's see how Memory Alpha deals with this incongruity:


Oh, good, the SNW material is now at the beginning of her entry, just as so many other entries have been overwritten with SNW and STD material.

I think poor old Bjo Trimble would stroke out and die if she was asked to do another revision of her CONCORDANCE.


You can expect more Adventures on Memory Alpha as we proceed, I think. Let us examine the mental gymnastics at work as devoted fans desperately try to reconcile these gaping shotgun blasts in the canon. One of my favorites is the U.S.S. ENTERPRISE ILLUSTRATED HANDBOOK from a few years back, which claimed that the ship was initially commanded by Pike in its first pilot configuration, then got refitted to the STD/SNW look, then got refitted back to a variant of the original look by the time of the second pilot. Sure. Makes perfect sense to me.



Also, it's incredibly unsubtle and key-jangly of this episode to rip off SUPERMAN III by having Spock's human and Vulcan halves fighting each other (albeit in a dream) in a riff on "Amok Time". Which I'm sure the writers' room refers to as "the one where Kirk and Spock fight with the things and the CABLE GUY music".

And I only just noticed that NuPike's green wraparound has not one but two insignias--one on the belt, and the other in the usual spot, over the heart. The usual redundant and overdesigned uniforms again, I see. Just like the tiny watermarks all over the AbramsVerse uniforms. It's no surprise that this version of Starfleet is akin to the Department of Redundancy Department.


And what happened to M'Benga that would cause him to be demoted from the CMO position, and to lose his accent?



Just call it a reboot. That's all they have to do. Just call it a reboot that's not connected to the real canon.

But the spiteful hacks can't do that, can they? They just have to piss all over the works of their betters.
 
Back
Top