Star Trek: Picard

Is there a canonical transporter FAQ somewhere? I'd love to read it.
I wish. It's basically just my own compilation of what I've gleaned from every instance of transporters beyond simple point-A-to-point-B, from "The Cage" through "Endgame". Everything from how the two Kirks couldn't survive separated in "The Enemy Within" to the interdimensional transposition in "Mirror, Mirror" to Saavik speaking during transport in TWOK to Barclay's POV during transport in "Realm of Fear", plus bunches more.

During TOS, there were memos that it wasn't the already-established sci-fi trope of the copy-recreate-disintegrate-original type of "teleporter". It was a handwave-y "stop being here, start being there" machine. Rick and Mike tried to sort out some sort of working theory for TNG, where they proceeded from the conceit of matter and energy being altered phase-states of the same thing, that interchangeability being a cornerstone of Federation tech since before TOS. They got as far as the "matter stream" being literally sent from origin to destination, but never got around the problem of an atomic explosion's worth of energy being required to break and then re-join every subatomic bond to make that model work, so they just ran with what they had and told people not to look too close.

As I've learned more about quantum mechanics and probability, I feel like it's more of a controlled-macro-scale-quantum-tunnelling device, where the subject is isolated by the scanners, then the probability of them being at the origin is suppressed while the probability of their being at the destination is augmented until they stop "being" here and start "being" there, instead. Best working theory that supports the observed phenomena.
Here's how I think about the brain to android copy problem.
Suppose you are copied exactly and transferred. You wake up and you're you.
What if your old body is still alive and coherent? From your pov you're you, but from your old body's pov you're a copy. Kind of terrifying actually.
You would both be you. Like in "We'll Always Have Paris", when Picard, Riker, and Data got on the turbolift to head to the bridge, only to have the lift stop to let on Picard, Riker, and Data. They had that moment of looking at each other through the doorway. "Oh, they are us. But we are also us. So in a way... we are both us." That was also the premise of Voyager's "Living Witness". The Doctor was activated from a backup module left behind by accident. He knew himself to be Voyager's EMH, with all of those memories and experiences prior to the module being separated from the ship... but so did the Doctor still on Voyager, cruising on its way home. Or Will and Thomas Riker in TNG's "Second Chances". Same memories up until the beam-up to the Potemkin. Same DNA. Same person. In the same way, the two yous would then have divergent lives as you each moved on from the transfer moment.
 
Even granting this show some semblance of acknowledgement that it exists in the Trek universe, Picard is really dead. The golem Picard is only a copy. The android may have a scan of his neural network, but it is, in essence, just a copy.

They did not capture Picard’s essence or soul; that is gone. There was no Vulcan mind meld to transfer his soul into someone else and then perform a refusion. All they have left is this creepy android that reacts like, and thinks it’s Picard, but it isn’t. He is truly dead.

The best analogy would be if, in “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” the real Captain Kirk died and the android created by Dr. Corby, with an imprint of Kirk’s personality, memories, etc. continued on in the role of the Captain.

It would be a convincing copy (albeit, filled with 1960’s transistors and wires) but it would not be Captain Kirk...only a mere copy. The “JL Picard Golem” is the same outcome.

41DB19AB-DDAC-4D57-9BAC-DBA2411B7484.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Other than metaphorically, has the Trek universe established the existence of something called a "soul"?
 
Other than metaphorically, has the Trek universe established the existence of something called a "soul"?

Well, I think it’s discussed in terms of a “consciousness”. But beyond that, human existence is confined to biochemical elements and energy. They have yet to explain how that would transfer over to mechanical circuits, etc. Unless you have literally transplanted a human brain and nervous system into a mechanical body, any mechanical contrivance is only a facsimile, or copy. The original person is gone.
 
Other than metaphorically, has the Trek universe established the existence of something called a "soul"?

I do recall it mentioned. At least as far as Kirk's beliefs. My view is it's a personal belief now as it will be then I'm sure.

Kirk : What I have done, I had to do. Sarek : But at what cost? Your ship. Your son. Kirk : If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul.
 
And was Spock really Spock after that whole katra thing. Maybe he wasn't, given he was laughing in the ocean with whales.
 
The tacked on romance of two couples who had shown no attractions previously (or had even met, as pointed out) was just whhaaaaaaa???

Despite the circumstances, surely there should be a trial, or something, for the murder of Maddox?!? It's just a rule of drama; she can have a moral redemption by doing something noble, but she still must pay for her crime. As my old screenwriting teacher would say, "(so-and-so) MUST DIE."

THAT. Tacky. No issue with representation, but that was completely tacked on, pointless, not well thought out, and I feel like it disrespected both characters as well as the people groups it was meant to appeal to. Not even SJW, just tacky.
 
10 episodes. Not 26. With an entire history of Trek to draw from to learn from mistakes, of what does and doesn't work. And this is what we get for Star Trek. If they wanted to make a new BSG, they just should have.

I still see some glimmer of possibility, but they're going to have to pull their heads out of their asses to make things right.
 
Coming next season, yet another all-female secret society of fanatical Romulans, called the “Sword Sprinters”, will be revealed as those that “send synthetics to collect their social security checks” and will be on the hunt for Picard. It will not be called murder...it will be called “retirement of those with sheer ******* hubris” (the “secret loathing” of the “Sword Sprinters”)

The tag line for Season 2:

“Do Synthetic Golems Dream of Electric Yellow-Eyed Androids?”

D5B4936F-7CC9-404E-B49B-38046D6A6468.jpeg


When not hunting Synthetic Golems, the “Sword Sprinters” may be found at their local community lodges, next to either the local Rotary Club, or Elk’s Lodge, where they do a lot of good charity work for the communities they have emigrated to. For $12.99, you can buy a ticket to their weekly charity steak and ale dinners, which are renowned for their unique Romulan flavor.
 
Last edited:
I have plenty of issues with this show but (surprisingly) this isn't one of them... Spock melded with Nomad and VGER so a machine learning to meld with a human?
Not something that I have an issue with.

Interesting point. I hadn’t considered that.

I think overall creative quality in the storytelling earns a certain amount of scientific leeway with me. The ends can justify the means, let’s say. The creators of Classic Trek earned that in abundance with their overall rich stories and characters. The creators of Discovery / Picard have yet to earn that same place with me.

It’s a very unearned liberty of storytelling that they employ with every story they tell.
 
Last edited:
I have plenty of issues with this show but (surprisingly) this isn't one of them... Spock melded with Nomad and VGER so a machine learning to meld with a human?
Not something that I have an issue with.
*nod* I thought about that. Those were both special cases. We have no idea what the alien probe NOMAD merged with was wired like. And V'ger had crossed some threshold of accumulated data that it "achieved consciousness, itself" on its journey back to Earth, after being enabled by the planet of living machines.

I got the impression these synthetics are derived from Data. If it was stated that they had a different "evolutionary path", I missed it. I need to re-watch TNG again (oh darn), but besides when Ira imprinted himself on Data's brain and when Q gave him his goodbye present, I don't remember any instances of Data showing up as a blip telepaths could do anything with, and I seem to remember that extending to subsequents like Lal. Maybe something to do with the positronic brain versus electronic (like ours and, presumably, most of the natural life-forms we've encountered -- such as Vulcans and Betazoids). Either way, I would have had it remarked on and speculated about in screen-time, as it would be the first time we've seen it happen after a whole lot of "can't", and then done it. Could have stolen thirty seconds from some of the ponderous reaction shots.
 
I think overall creative quality in the storytelling earns a certain amount of scientific leeway with me. The ends can justify the means, let’s say. The creators of Classic Trek earned that in abundance with their overall rich stories and characters. The creators of Discovery / Picard have yet to earn that same place with me.

It’s a very unearned liberty of storytelling that they employ with every story they tell.
I’ve said this about other franchises before, but it definitely applies here:

If you’re out on a limb, creating something new and blazing a new path building a world while the powers that be barely give you any budget or resources at all because you’re too much of a risk: I will give you a TON of leeway.

but if you’re given a tried and true gold mine where someone else already did the heavy lifting of proving the concept AND handing you a fan base on a silver platter along with budget and resources the original visionaries would have drooled over: you get no leeway. Get it right, because you have no excuses.
 
Back
Top