Real or Fake Graflex?

Indeed ... whether with intend or not ... he did put the wrong parts back together :wacko Perhaps you can persuade via messages to him, before you give negative feedback, to set the record straight between him, the other buyer and you ... he does have the address of the previous winner ... so this could be rectified just by leaving one of you with a replica and perhaps a partly refund since a Park's is worth $150, and the other with the real genuine parts ... not having 100% positive feedback will harm the seller even more . . . in the long run :)

Chaim
 
Last edited:
The pictures he shows in both auctions show detailed pictures of only the original parts....the base on this one and the top on the other. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, but this makes it all seem fishy. I wish I had looked more closely at this when I bought it, all of this could have been avoided. I'm going to contact him now, see what he says about it.
 
This quote, "the same type used in the first Star Wars trilogy for Luke Skywalker's Lightsaber" to me means it's a real graflex. So I'd say this is a lie and you have the right to get your money back. But, if you don't win, you could make what you have more authentic by tracing down a graflex slave and putting the parts from the slave into the top half shell
 
The only clamp with the correc placement was the old Romans, and he's not doing the correct-placement ones anymore. Also, Romans were aluminium.

That's not true. I have multiple roman clamps that are steel with correct spacing. I just checked and they are magnetic.

I think biskit also had the spacing correct. Can someone check that for me?
 
I have just spoken with Romans today. Anyway, originals are nickel plated... brass?, not steel.
 
A while back I bought a 3 Cell a bit hastily on eBay, you don't see too many for sale here in the UK so at £100 buy it now I went for it (even though I didn't need another)

like this one the seller was a bit vague but suggested it was genuine & the auction pictures weren't great, in my haste I didn't ask the questions I should have

when it came I realised it was a Replica the moment I started unwrapping it

I emailed the seller explained that it was infact a replica & we agreed on a partial refund he gave me back £30 so I paid £70 for a replica which I could live with

I find its always worth contacting a seller
 
Again, not true. The original clamps rust and are also magnetic. Brass is not. The tube sections are a different story.

My clamp is magnetic, and has a bit of rust underneath the lever when I disassemble it. Neither the lower genuine or upper replica portion is magnetic on mine.
 
I would say, as the others have already, the clamp and bottom tube are genuine. Sucks about the top part, but that really is the easiest of the three main pieces to get. I have two at home right now. I don't remember if they were de-beer tabbed or not. If not, I can see about letting you have one for a good price, but you'll still need the LK red button (Long Knurled).

The dead giveaways were pretty much pinpointed by teecrooz at the beginning. Check out the Real vs. Replics thread by scottjua that teecrooz linked on the first page.
 
Bottom and clamp are original. Top is most likely a Parks. Slotted screw on the rabbit ears is an instant tell. Plus it just doesn't have the same look finish wise, as a real one.
 
I got a message back from the seller, it seems he doesn't leave me a leg to stand on to fight it:
"Everything is correct as I listed it, everything I've sold I've listed correctly - everything I have sold I bought second-hand
and therefore is used.
The item is used in all respects.
Nothing I have sold was ever ordered from any manufacturer by myself. I bought all items from individuals and have resold them.
I describe each and every auction accurately - It is a used Graflex 3 Cell the same type used for Luke Skywalker's Lightsaber.
I did not include genuine or vintage or any other descriptive analysis other than what it simply is: A Graflex 3 Cell. Period.
I also said to "Please ask questions before bidding." As I recall you did not.
Thank you."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"It is a used Graflex 3 Cell the same type used for Luke Skywalker's Lightsaber."

If the top isn't a Graflex, then you have him here with this statement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprisingly angered by this.

Yeah... the second you write "Used Graflex 3 cell" on a replica, you're lying.

I can't put up a kit car and say "Lamborghini"... then say "oh... well I never said it was a real one.. Just stated what it was... and it IS a Lamborghini".

No. It's not.

And ebay would side with you.

Based on his response, I would take him down.

He COULD have written "Luke Skywalker lightsaber part"... that's fine... but he invoked the "Graflex" name. Lukes lightsaber isn't a graflex... it's from a galaxy far, far away... you're selling a "Graflex" then it sure as hell better be from the mid 1900's.

TAKE HIM DOWN.

POS.
 
I got a message back from the seller, it seems he doesn't leave me a leg to stand on to fight it:
"Everything is correct as I listed it, everything I've sold I've listed correctly - everything I have sold I bought second-hand
and therefore is used.
The item is used in all respects.
Nothing I have sold was ever ordered from any manufacturer by myself. I bought all items from individuals and have resold them.
I describe each and every auction accurately - It is a used Graflex 3 Cell the same type used for Luke Skywalker's Lightsaber.
I did not include genuine or vintage or any other descriptive analysis other than what it simply is: A Graflex 3 Cell. Period.
I also said to "Please ask questions before bidding." As I recall you did not.
Thank you."

What a dick!
It's not a used graflex 3-cell!!!! it's a used replica!

NeoRutty is right. A replica Lamborghini that has been driven a couple times is not a "used Lamborghini".

This guy intentionally mislead you. I'd report him, and open up a case with e-bay as well as paypal. If for no other reason then to give him a hard time. He's a scumbag
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, unfortunately I have to re-iterate what everyone else is saying; replica top with genuine bottom and clamp. I had been watching both of his auctions for a while out of curiosity. I speculated he'd done exactly what you've suggested, combined parts from a real Graflex and a replica to make two to sell as real. I'm thinking he thought he could get away with it by being vague in the description and playing dumb, since part of it was a real flash.

In fact, he re-listed it several times when it didn't reach his reserve, and changed the description. At first it was described something like "Vintage Graflex 3-cell. I'm not an expert on vintage camera gear, so it may have replacement parts." After he wasn't getting the price he wanted, he changed the description to just "Sold as-is" and stopped mentioning replacement parts completely.

He should be reported. He was purposely misleading in the photos and the descriptions. The fact that he had a notice about possible replacement parts and then removed it to get a higher price shows it was done purposely.

Jason
 
I agree with all of you, the Lamborghini argument is a good analogy haha. Some people just care about the money I guess, they don't care who they screw over. I sent him another message, but tomorrow I'm going to go to ebay and paypal. @killrmonkey I did see those auctions when I searched google for his username. He listed them on several different ebays (.hk,.ca, etc) all with the same vague descriptions and pictures like you said. Definitely learned my lesson though, I should probably lock my wallet away before I make any big purchases and I do sufficient research.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing: he didn't sell a Graflex 3 Cell. He sold a Parks 3 Cell reproduction (with a few Graflex parts).
 
He's getting pissed now, two messages in a row, saying that "they are the same thing" "i never made any guarantees, etc, etc."
Message 1:
"It IS a Graflex 3 Cell Flash Gun just perhaps not "vintage" - meaning "old".
And I made no such claims.
I'm not an expert in vintage camera equipment.

As far as I understand it even a reproduction Graflex works perfectly well and functions the exact same way
that vintage Greflex does and works perfectly well with vintage Graflex Cameras.
But if will function just as well as a "vintage" flash gun even if you are using it for the purpose of taking photos
with a Graflex Camera.

But it is exactly that - It is EXACTLY a Graflex 3 Cell Flash Gun as described and I bought it second hand from someone else
- you're just being picky about the age and when certain parts may have been produced.
But I assure you - you are holding EXACTLY a Graflex Flash Gun of the same style as was used for Luke Skywalker's Lightsaber.
Exactly the same style.
I never said it was ACTUAL prop used in the movie, believe me if it had been the actual thing that Mark Hamill held in his hand
then I would have asked thousands for it instead of hundreds ... But it looks and feels EXACTLY the same and is EXACTLY the
same size with the same details and it works. So there is no difference except in perhaps age on some parts.
And as I said, I did not specify that it was "vintage" or "genuine" and I listed it as "Sold As Is" and "No Returns" if you read
the description correctly.
AND of course you never asked me any questions before bidding or before the auction was over and you could have very easily.
You could have asked to see more photos - and you did not.
You could have asked me a hundred questions about it - and you did not.
You received EXACTLY what was in the photos except for the DVD which I said was not part of the sale - you got EXACTLY
what you bid on and won.
Thank you. "

Message 2:
"The description is NOT misleading it IS a Graflex - from top to bottom it is an EXACT Graflex 3 Cell...
Just perhaps not a vintage one, and as I said, I did not list it as such. I did not list it as "genuine' or "vintage" in the description.
if you got half a "vintage" flash gun then you still ended up with a whole Graflex - but part "vintage".
But I assure you the WHOLE thing is still a Graflex style flash gun.

All I said it was - it was what it is - A Graflex 3 Cell - no more and no less.
If you look up places that sell reproductions they still list them as Graflex and even stamp the name Graflex
on the bottom and on the side of the clamp and they work with a Graflex Camera.
Therefore they ARE Graflex Flash Gun's because they are that STYLE, they're just not "vintage."

Hey, Graflex are very difficult to find - you should be very lucky you got one at all at the price you did.
Sometimes people have to buy 2 or 3 to get a complete Graflex 3 Cell the way that they want it.
As you saw, mine did not have the Red Button or certain things with it - that was all in the photos which
is why I said it is "Sold as is".
You would have to get at least a 2nd Graflex to complete it or a reproduction Red Button.

Also, you know you can get Graflex 2 Cells pretty cheaply - if you wanted to you could just put
the one you got from me with a complete Graflex 2 Cell and have a complete "vintage" Graflex.
Even parts are worth quite a lot by themselves - a vintage Graflex Clamp or 3 Cell bottom can
both sell for a LOT of money.
I've seen just the very bottom part of a 3 Cell go for over $200.00 by itself that's because many
people buy 2 Cells and then find a 3 Cell bottom and Bam! They have a complete 3 Cell...

Also the Clamp is used not just with Luke's Lightsaber but also for Ben Kenobi's Lightsaber
so a vintage Graflex Clamp is almost as valuable as the 3 Cell bottom.
Maybe just as valuable - vintage parts are very rare and valuable."

My response to him was
"You say all of this, but what you sold me IS NOT a GRAFLEX 3 Cell. It is a Replica 3 Cell with a some graflex parts. Whether it looks like a Graflex and functions like a Graflex does not make it a Graflex. It is not "EXACTLY a Graflex Flash Gun" I never assumed it was the actual prop from the movie, nor that it was a replica. Your description said it is a "Graflex Flash Gun of the same type" but it is not the same type, it looks like it is the same type because people have manufactured replicas to be as such. But these are NOT Graflex 3 Cells, it is a PARKS 3 Cell. I didn't ask any questions because I did not assume I was going to be scammed out of $300 for half of a Graflex. Your description did not say it was "Graflex Style" it says "Graflex 3 Cell Flash Gun, the same type used" which is not indicative of what you sold me. You sold me something that looks like a graflex with some parts that appear to be of the same type. Your pictures were not indicative of this either, someone who wasn't looking closely would not even realize that it came without the red button. Not one picture even highlighted this flaw. I knew it was without the button, and this is not the issue here, the issue is that for $300 you sold me half of a replica. Your previously listed auctions, after further investigation, highlighted facts such as "VINTAGE" and "may have some parts missing or replaced" which is found here:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Gra...371?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item27fc35bb73)

or the previous auction you just sold which contained the rest of the vintage Graflex parts here:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Graflex-3-C...D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
With the argument that "the vintage parts are very rare and valuable" you knew this and sold one vintage flash for the price of two"
 
Back
Top