Kit Rae
Sr Member
I thought he manifested it quite clearly by treating David as an inferior and nothing more than a servant from the beginning of the movie, even to the point of calling him "boy" numerous times. I immediately did not like his character when I saw that. I have no doubt that David picking him to infect first was directly related to those treatments, but to be fair, David did ask permission (of sorts) before he did itI read one interview with the actor who played Halloway (can't remember his name) and he basically said that Halloway was a "robot racist" although he didn't "intentionally" manifest that.
You don't think this was Milburn to trying to show Fifield that as the biologist, HE was in charge of this particular situation when confronting the ass-flower snake, simply as a response to Fifield making him feel like an idiot and showing off with the "pups" in earlier scenes? That what I got from his dialogue and dumb Crocodile hunter actions. he was just trying to one-up Fifield by acting like he knew how to handle things like this.Maybe... I dunno. I can buy it a bit more with Kane. With Milburn, that thing was clearly showing signs of aggression and he just kept on... but then, I have seen people continue to try to pet a dog that is snarling at them and then are surprised when they get bit, so you might be right.
Yeah, that's dead on, but more-so, each of those relationships are also between each creator his creation, crossing every level. From the creation of a species, to the offspring of that species, to the species creating another species (so to speak) with Weland's androids.In retrospect, I think it is a family driven movie, especially from the perspective of parents and children. The Engineers to the humans, Shaw to her father, Vickers to hers, David and Weyland. The Engineers, Shaw, Vickers, Weyland, and most especially David are the characters that are explored.
Last edited: