Re: Craig will be Bond again
I hate that theory. There's no need for that at all. If they want to mix things up with different actors of differing races/ethnicities they should either reboot every time they change actors (which I also hate), or use the 007 title as an excuse. The series doesn't necesarily need a James Bond.
Well, I also hate the "code name" theory -- seeing as all the films through Brosnan's run clearly presented him as the same man. But I don't think they need to reboot
or mess with the 007 title. They've frequently shifted the tone of the films over the years, in various directions, without doing any of that, and I see no reason to do otherwise going forward. I hated the idea that they were rebooting the series in
Casino Royale, although I have enjoyed Craig in the role. I didn't like the idea of the reboot because, even though continuity had been rather slight over the years, they still periodically referenced the events of
On Her Majesty's Secret Service, and that was important to me. I can't really
identify with Bond through the crazy stunts he performs, or his charm, or all the women he beds, per se. However, him having lost a woman he truly loved enough to marry her -- I've done that. I can identify. It is why I view Bond, despite the undeniable "cool factor" he embodies, as a tragic character. I was sad to see them brush that aside. They tried to give Craig's Bond the same sort of resonance with Vesper, but it just wasn't the same for me.
SSB